** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
Title:
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
To manage notifications about this
** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
This issue is gone in Karmic. I skipped Jaunty, so I cannot speak for
that release, though I suspect it is fixed there too. This report is
potentially closeable.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
The page mentioned in the last update is no longer valid. The new link
is:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelTeamBugPolicies
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
actually an anecdote: The performance degradation was so important in my
case, that synergyc started reordering the X events, jumbling what I was
writing:
"Dies sollte ein verdrehungsfreier Satz sein mal sehen, ob man den nach
einer Weile noch lesen kann"
came out as
"Die ss oslltee iennvrerd
Hi, everyone:
FWIW, I just installed the synergy package on a fresh install of
Intrepid Beta. Vanilla synergyc (my server is an XP workstation) is
working great for me - if anything, it feels as fast and responsive as
7.10 did.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
For what it's worth, this returned again in Intrepid if you use the
hardy synergy package (the intrepid package is broken, and yes there is
already a bug for that). Using the debian bzr tree does make this go
away.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You r
Joel Fuster wrote:
> I applied your patch and rebuilt Synergy, but I still have the lag issue. I
> am using it as a client to a WinXP machine. Potentially relevant information:
> * Running an up-to-date 8.04
> * I have an SMP machine
> * It is most pronounced for me with Mozilla Thunderbir
WSmart wrote:
> I just installed Xubuntu Hardy and I was running Synergy for a period
> without a problem, Ubuntu Gutsy as server. Suddenly it's unusable.
> Might be a coincidence, but this happened right after I first tried to
> copy text from a browser. That was the first time I tried to use th
I just installed Xubuntu Hardy and I was running Synergy for a period
without a problem, Ubuntu Gutsy as server. Suddenly it's unusable.
Might be a coincidence, but this happened right after I first tried to
copy text from a browser. That was the first time I tried to use the
clipboard. I had to
Just thought I'd report that I used "chrt -r -p 1 " and the
difference is night and day...no lag or stuttering cursor. I had first
tried this on the synergyc process, but that didn't seem to have an
effect. Not sure why this is necessary now, but at least I have a
workaround for the moment...
--
Hi Jeff,
I applied your patch and rebuilt Synergy, but I still have the lag issue. I am
using it as a client to a WinXP machine. Potentially relevant information:
* Running an up-to-date 8.04
* I have an SMP machine
* It is most pronounced for me with Mozilla Thunderbird or a busy page i
Matt:
If it still works at all, I doubt you did too much wrong. :-)
The fix was very specific to the X11 code, and may have only fixed the
client side. So there may be some more work to do. OTOH, I've also
noticed a few bugs related to the Windows client, so it could be
something else.
If you
Jeff,
I pulled the package source from your Bazaar tree at
http://bzr.licquia.org/synergy/debian/, and after messing around with it
to get everything in order, I was able to get it installed. Problem is,
I'm still getting the lag problem on my client. I think I'm running
opposite of what most ev
Debian maintainer here.
In Debian, synergy has been working fine up until we get Xlib-XCB into
unstable/testing; it still worked fine even with kernel 2.6.24. So, it
seems the combination of the newer kernel and Xlib was the catalyst.
Still, I can confirm that Mike Stroyan's patch seems to clear
Steven,
Retract my last comment :) After rebooting my WinXP machine, which is the
synergy server, the problem is fixed and mouse/keyboard is perfectly smooth
now. Sorry for the bother!
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notificati
Steven,
I have both upgraded to the latest kernel in hardy-proposed and made the
hosts file changes and the problem still occurs.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
I am experiencing sporadic crashes of both the server and client on my
Hardy machines. Hardy server, two Hardy clients, all running the
2.6.24-17-generic kernel on vastly differing hardware.
I don't seem to be able to reproduce it at will. When I enable
debugging synergy slows down and the probl
For those still having network problems, if you follow the advice of
Marlon Rodriguez at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=490467&aid=1956832&group_id=59275
does the issue go away?
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug no
I'd just like to add a me too.
I am using Synergy server from Ubuntu Feisty to Ubuntu Hardy, and it is slow
At the same time the same synergy server is going to a windows Xp and an ubuntu
Gutsy, with no problems.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You rec
Seems also to lag once in a while when running via sudo, but is mostly
usable.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
I'm updated my client machine to proposed kernel. It fees much better,
but still not as good as in 7.10 - mouse sometimes lags a bit, keyboard
messes up typed symbols in alternate (russian) layout when i type quick.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You r
In my case, I'm running 2.6.24-17-generic from hardy-proposed and while
the long lagging/"buffering" problem is gone, it is still very slow
(mouse is jumpy and I can type faster than keys show up in a terminal
window, for example) and thus barely usable. It feels like I'm on a bad
remote desktop/V
For me, enabling hardy-proposed w 2.6.24-16 solved this issue along with a lot
of others. Now running synergy without root.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/188226
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification
Using Mike's patch from 2008-04-29 (comment #56), normal usage doesn't
yield any lag. However, mashing keys in a terminal and moving the mouse
wildly triggers a noticeable delay.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because
Bug still occurs
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Still happening on 2.6.24-16-generic;
helpdeskdan: I would recommend running it with sudo. Your call, though.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Gah! What an annoying problem! What solution is the best current
workaround? Thanks to everybody for commenting on this bug!
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
I'm on 2.6.24-17-generic in the latest hardy and am still having this
issue.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
I have installed the final release of hardy, and tried the beta, and
have the same hanging issues that everyone else has, and doing the sudo
trick doesn't seem to give any noticeable improvement. I don't recall
having any issues with Gutsy Gibbon as the client or the server. Come on
Ubuntu, it stil
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
I may have spoken too soon, I cannot reproduce the issue right now with
the new linux-image-2.6.24-17-generic kernel.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
I personally do not have this issue anymore since I installed linux-
image-2.6.24-17-generic from proposed on my 64 bit laptop.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Just wanted to add I still have this problem on a Hardy client with a
Hardy server after the latest linux-image-2.6.24-17-generic kernel was
installed.
Also, even though I am using a Hardy server my Synergy client works fine
and without lag on a Gutsy client.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
I have had this bug with 2.4.24-16-generic (single-core i686 Intel
Pentium M box).
My solution was to recompile libX11 with XCB disabled (not sure if this is a
good idea or not, just throwing another workaround out there in case anyone
wants it).
It worked for me, no lag or issues since then.
-
I have the same issue as the original poster.
I also ran a Wireshark sniff, but from the server-side. The lag did
occur during the capture, and seems to correlate with the sections of
the capture where the client responds with TCP/Synergy/NOP packets
instead of blank TCP/ACK packets. Capture attac
sorry about the large attachment above. Use this one instead.
** Attachment added: "synergy_freezing_issue.pcap.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14077409/synergy_freezing_issue.pcap.gz
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notificat
I've got a little different situation. I've got a WinXP server, Win2003
client, Ubuntu 8.04 client, and Xubuntu 8.04 client, each of the linux
computers are running the 2.6.24-16-generic kernel and the Ubuntu
computer initially had the spotty problem but now works fine, the
Xubuntu computer though
Had the same issue with WinXP as server and Hardy as client. Using
QuickSynergy (command line gives me scary flashbacks of COBOL green
screens...) and modifying the launcher (right click Applications, Edit
Menus, Accessories, Right click QuickSynergy, Properties) changed the
command to 'gksudo qui
Hi Mike,
Just tested your new patch, i still get the xXGetXCBBuffer assertion.
I'm not really using a dual core cpu, only a p4 with hyperthreading
Another issue with this new patch is that synergyc was using 100% of my
cpu.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19
I found a couple of problems in the previous patch.
The test for isEmpty had the sense backwards.
I also reduced the number of writes to the wake-up pipe
and increased the amount read from the pipe per call.
The select-based code (which ubuntu doesn't use) also had
a couple of defects that I found
Mike Stroyan wrote:
> I just added this fix as a comment to the upstream report at
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1930587&group_id=59275&atid=490467
> ** Attachment added: "fix for lag of synergyc on input"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13995863/synergy_diffs
I jus
I also applied the patch, things worked ok for some seconds and then
synergyc crashed (or exited).
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
i got this error message:
INFO: CScreen.cpp,116: leaving screen
INFO: CScreen.cpp,98: entering screen
synergyc: ../../src/xcb_lock.c:77: _XGetXCBBuffer: Assertion `((int) ((xcb_req)
- (dpy->request)) >= 0)' failed.
Abandon
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940
This problem with synergyc is actually synergy's own defect related to using
X11 from multiple threads.
The connection to the kernel schedule is seen because a race condition in the
application is turning
out badly more often than it used to. But the right fix for this problem is in
synergy.
I
This bug has been triaged; the cause of the bug seems to be known.
Yes, the root cause of this bug can introduce lags and general desktop
unresponsiveness in other applications. It's a kernel scheduler option
that's known to the (upstream) developers to cause scheduling problems
and which has unf
Yet another "me too" from me, considering this is triaged. I was having
a slightly different problem than commonly described here, because my
Ubuntu Hardy laptop is the server and my desktop is the client. When my
mouse was on my desktop, and I clicked something, there would be a
varying delayed re
Is it possible that this bug is affecting other applications too? I
occasionally (but not nearly as often) see similar behavior in Firefox -
it hangs for a few seconds and then eventually 'catches up' and goes
through all the keyboard/mouse movements in high speed (this is without
synergy installe
I just upgraded two machines to 8.04 (from 7.10) and noticed that
synergy is lagging on the client machine. sudo seems to fix the problem
for me, but wanted to say "me too" .
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because yo
I'm also experiencing this bug. The sudo workaround seems to fix it,
but is there a way to automatically start synergy with sudo on startup?
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Well ... I have the released version of hardy installed and have the
same problem. Using sudo workaround for now.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team) => Ubuntu Kernel
Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
This bug is regression caused by a kernel change #188226
What can be done to make synergy functionnal for hardy?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Kernel Team (canonical-kernel-team)
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
I've also encountered this problem. The sudo workaround fixed it, but
the greater kernel bug makes me anxious. Where will we see it affect
hardy next?
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Also affects: synergy2 via
http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1930587
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Hi
I did not comment on that bug because what I've read they already make up their
mind, so I guess they have some valid reasons.
Making people desktop unresponive could be one of them, I am not an kernel
expert.
If you think that you can persuade them to do the right thing feel free
to do so (and
Maybe we should add a comment to bug #188226 about this synergy issue?
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Thank you very much Baronek!
It works like a charm now, without having to sudo it :) (running on the .25
kernel)
I hope the default will be set to off soon, so that i dont have to do
this for each new kernel version.
No more mouse/keyboard lag!!! :cheers:
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
h
I have disabled FAIR_GROUP_SCHED in my kernel config. Tested this on both
vanila 2.6.25 and ubuntu srouces 2.6.24 (downloaded via apt today)
-- this is old config
$cat .config | grep FAIR
# CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED is not set
CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y
CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED=y
--this is my modifica
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I believe this may be the same bug as bug #188226. Could someone who's
> experiencing this problem try to install the -server kernel flavor
> (linux-image-server or linux-server), to test whether the different
> scheduling options fixes this issue?
One of my two machines i
Thank you for taking the time to report this problem and help to improve
Ubuntu.
I believe this may be the same bug as bug #188226. Could someone who's
experiencing this problem try to install the -server kernel flavor
(linux-image-server or linux-server), to test whether the different
scheduling
LOL ao drunk.
- Mike Mayer
www.mikehmayer.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:06 PM, Mark Florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And another Me Too.
>
> I'm surprised how many people use synergy AND use hardy, pre-release!
>
> --
> 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
> https://bugs.launc
And another Me Too.
I'm surprised how many people use synergy AND use hardy, pre-release!
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
sudo workaround gives some boost, but performance is still crappy
compared to 7.10.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
If this is regression in kernel then it was not resolved in vanila
kernel 2.6.25 as I was able to reproduce it easily. Sudo workaround
works.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
True, but going to release with the current situation is even worse.
This together with synergyc crashes multiple times a day is the most
important issue I have with hardy.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you a
i doubt it.. I've copy pasted his "solution" below, as you can see at
the end of his text, its obviously not proper coding. Its just another
workaround to give it more priority. I haven't tested it myself yet, but
checking for the event ever 0.01 second doesn't seem like a healthy way
of making a f
Great! Would this get into release?
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
I compliled synergy from scratch and applied the information here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1930587&group_id=59275&atid=490467
Now, synergy is very smooth, with no timeout issues.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You rec
I added the following to my /etc/gdm/PreSession/Default to work-around
this issue:
#Synergy Server (root)
/usr/bin/synergys --config /etc/synergy.conf &
This starts synergy automatically before login, as root. This also give
me the ability to log out of my X session and still traverse to my mac.
(sorry, that is still not 100% and also doen't prevent synergyc from
crashing a few times a day)
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I tried that, but chrt keeps the prio on 0 for me (SCHED_OTHER). When
manually setting it to 99 it works but that needs sudo, and I do not
want to run synergyc as root when I do not have to. I automated this by
creating a file 'startsynergyc.sh' with file mode 6755 and the following
contents:
/usr
Hi; I encountered this issue and seem to have found a fix.
I suspect that the problem is the new scheduler in Heron. I managed to
fix the problem completely by running the process with realtime
priority:
chrt synergyc [... your ordinary parameters ...]
I haven't had a glitch since.
--
2.6.24-
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
Does anyone have any suspicions that the newly released 2.6.25 is
going to help us here? It sounds like there are a lot of tweakins'
coming through the interpipes with this release... Much along the
lines of the NAS additions, (framework)?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Sebastien Estienne
<[EM
I'm using 2.6.24-7 and have no issue running synergyc as normal user,
every version >= 2.6.24-8 have this lagging behaviour.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Add another me too to this. I am running the synergy client on a T61p
and my servers are one of Fedora Core 8, Win XP, or Debian stable. This
behavior happens on all of the servers and the sudo workaround works for
me. This is still an issue running a kernel from linus's tree
yesterday.
Not sur
I am also experiencing this problem.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
Confirmed the same here, although synergyc was running on Hardy and synergys on
Windows. When switching the two, the issue does not occur (now I have the
problem that typing double quotes is not possible on Windows, although I can do
that on Hardy at the same time).
At least keyboard movement is
This looks very similar to bug #91540, in case that helps anyone. I had
that problem back in the day, and now it's happening again... :(
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I still experience some intermittent hanging when the process is running
as root, though it's much less pronounced. I can confirm the bug, and
will provide any additional information that would be helpful to
debugging upon request.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Attachment added: "Without sudo"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12768402/syn-nosudo.log
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
I can confirm the bug, and that "sudo" is a workaround.
I've strace synergyc with and without sudo. i attached to log file.
With sudo it works, it only hangs 2/3 times at the begining and then it
works perfectly
When it's hanged i have a lot of:
6468 read(4, "\0\0\0\10DMMV\0\353\2\16", 4096) =
** Changed in: synergy (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
Got this since first try with hardy alpha 5. Works well with "sudo".
** Also affects: synergy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
I also suffer from this bug. I'm using Mac OS X as my synergy server,
and Hardy as my client. The workaround of running "sudo synergyc" works
for me, but can't be a long-term solution.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification
Also affected and completely up to date as of today (with both computers
running 2.6.24-11). I'm using with a t61p as the server to a desktop as
the client.
Listed workaround with starting synclient as root works but this feels
dirty. Any idea to the cause of the problem? Seems rather strange t
Perhaps it's related with 2.6.24-8 is the first tickless (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
kernel.
I don't use synergyc, so I can't test it, but I didn't noticed any
network problem with this kernel yet.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification
I've noticed identical behavior with this kernel and synergyc, so it's
definitely not an isolated incident.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
i also have this problem with a vanilla 2.6.24.3 self build kernel.
The funny thing is, if you open the System Monitor-Resource view, the
mouse is smooth, as soon you close the system monitor, synergy is more
or less not usable anymore.
The workaround running synergyc as root is also working here
I've found a workaround (at least here)
when i sudo the process, it doesnt seem to happen anymore (not yet at least)
from what a friend of mine said, it might be buffer related
I know its no permanent solution, but maybe this info will help someone
find one.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
I build a kernel wiht git and CONFIG_NO_HZ diseablet but synergy "hung"s
again. So it is not the CONFIG_NO_HZ option. Another point is, that
tickless option is enabled since 2.6.22, (changelog) and it workt with
Gutsy and 2.6.22-14 and even with 2.6.24-7...
here my own kernel-config
** Attachment
Sry, but forgot to say that it seemed that the synergy workt fine while
compiling the new kernel, mean's while the CPU was working... there was
no "hung" just a litte lag that could be from the CPU because its had
100% working in System-control.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.l
Sry, but forgot to say that it seemed that the synergy workt fine while
compiling the new kernel, mean's while the CPU was working... there was
no "hung" just a litte lag that could be from the CPU because its had
100% working in System-control.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.l
My synergyc is acting up in the same way, also since the update to
hardy. I'd like to add to the previous information that indeed, no
packets are lost. All input during "hangtime" is still going through.
For example, when typing, all text typed during hangtime will appear
once the application resum
I can also confirm this problem, even with the new 2.6.24-10-generic
Kernel. Maybe I'll build a kernel with CONFIG_NO_HZ to check if that is
the problem
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
A few things you can try. . .
1) 2.6.24-10 was recently released so you may want test the latest update.
2) If you think it is related to the CONFIG_NO_HZ option being enbaled, you can
play with building and booting your own kernel with this option disabled.
Instructions on how to build your ow
I can also confirm the same behaviour. Just rebooted into 2.6.24-7 and
synergy is working fine again.
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
98 matches
Mail list logo
