We bring in Java 8 from openjdk-r. Not having supported Java 8 in
Trusty is one of our other huge gripes, and arguably the fact that it's
not integrated and tested but you have to use a PPA instead is part of
why these problems don't get found until users try to use the software
:)
--
You receiv
Independent of the "Java is completely broken" issue, I do think the
originally stated case of "ca-certificate-java should support openjdk-8"
is still totally valid. Installing this package seems to bring in java
7 even when you already have 8 installed.
The current situation is pretty ridiculous
We're also finding that we cannot install Java 8 on Trusty anymore. One
other thing I noted is that the openjdk-8 package seems to have a
'Breaks: ' directive for older versions of ca-certificates-java,
including this version.
This is a really serious issue for us, and this is not the first time
We just ran into this bug on 14.04
How come it never got backported? This is a super serious issue, and just led
to a outage on our site :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396760
Title
We rolled out a new pip package to all our systems this morning. Since
it happened to pull in a new requests library, we now are the proud
owners of approximately 50 hosts with completely broken pip installs.
Exact same problem described here.
How does a bug this serious persist in a LTS release
Debian Stable fixed this bug almost two years ago. I just ran into it
on Ubuntu again. Does anyone actually care that this OS works? :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1342938
Title:
It looks like the bug may actually be fixed in trusty-security eglibc
2.19-0ubuntu6.6
eglibc (2.19-0ubuntu6.6) trusty-security; urgency=medium
* SECURITY UPDATE: getaddrinfo writes to random file descriptors under
high load
- debian/patches/any/cvs-resolv-reuse-fd.diff: reload file desc
Additionally, attempting to bring in utopic libc to fix the bug causes
dependency resolution problems down the road. Both the trusty python3
and Xamarin Mono repositories then start to fail with messages like:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
nuget : Depends: libnuget-core-cil (= 2
I too cannot understand why this fix was refused to backport to trusty.
We just spent two man-weeks tracking down this issue in one of our
applications, and to find that a severe race condition in libc was fixed
in Debian over a year ago but still not fixed in a *long term supported*
version of Ubu
Here is our workaround which should be better than the ones proposed
above (doesn't get wiped out by package upgrade / reinstall)
# Rename original out of the way, so updates / reinstalls don't squash our hack
fix
dpkg-divert --add --rename --divert /usr/bin/ruby.divert /usr/bin/ruby
dpkg-divert
BTW, this is actually maybe a security problem too -- people who think
they are installing a supported version are actually silently getting an
unsupported version that no longer receives upstream security fixes:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/01/10/ruby-1-9-3-will-end-
on-2015/
--
You re
I just stumbled on this, and if the Ubuntu team will close such obvious
problems with "Won't fix" for a LTS release, they should IMO just be up
front that it is not supported and remove Ruby packaging entirely.
Leaving totally broken packages in doesn't help anyone.
--
You received this bug notif
The lack of a openjdk8 package makes it very difficult to install any
Java packages via apt, as they all end up depending on something like
'java7-runtime-headless | java6-runtime-headless'. So you end up having
two different JDK installations just because of the lack of e.g. 'java8
-runtime-headl
Seems to fix it for me too, at least from a first check.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796
Title:
Bad page map in openjdk-7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
As the bug report says, this exists in the 14.04 release and still
affects 0.9.1~dfsg1-2.
0.10.0 from upstream is also affected.
** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
If you install ubuntu-minimal, apparmor is not installed.
If you then try to use docker, any attempt to launch one fails with:
root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# docker run busybox /bin/echo hi
2014/04/18 01:10:15 no such file or directory
once you:
root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# apt-get inst
Sorry, the above were accidentally collected as duplicates.
I am now running Linux ip-10-70-6-145 3.15.0-031500rc1-generic
#201404131835 SMP Sun Apr 13 22:36:23 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux as requested. I can still trigger this, easiest way to
reproduce is just running 'jps':
[ 503.
Apport does not seem to want to collect another report -- I chose to
"send report" but nothing is appearing in this bug :(
If you would like additional files let me know and I can collect them by
hand.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086538/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086541/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796
Title:
Ba
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086540/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086542/+files/UdevLog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796
Title:
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
[ 2808.161850] BUG: Bad page map in process java pte:0320 pmd:e8048067
[ 2808.161860] addr:7f968a63a000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma:
(null) mapping: (null) index:7f968a63a
[ 2808.161866] C
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086539/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130
Public bug reported:
[ 2808.161850] BUG: Bad page map in process java pte:0320 pmd:e8048067
[ 2808.161860] addr:7f968a63a000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma:
(null) mapping: (null) index:7f968a63a
[ 2808.161866] CPU: 0 PID: 18543 Comm: java Tainted: GB
3.13.0-24-
However, mounting everything nolock is definitely not a long term
solution... is anyone taking a look at this issue? Is this bug
something that should be filed at Mozilla instead?
--
MASTER "Firefox is already running, but is not responding" when /home is an NFS
directory
https://bugs.launchpa
This bug seems to have resurfaced in Intrepid, I hope reopening it is
the right thing to do. If not, tell me and I'll file a new one or
something.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
MASTER "Firefox is already running, but is not responding" when /home is an NF
I apologize for resurrecting this bug report from the dead, but I
anticipate that if I file a new report it will just be marked as a
duplicate of this one :)
I recently upgraded a few machines to Intrepid and am now experiencing this
problem. Same symptoms - 90% of the time firefox says it's alr
It might be useful to indicate what hardware (esp. motherboard and video
card and monitor) you are using, as well as things like the monitor
refresh rate and how you are plugged in (DVI/VGA)
--
intrepid alpha 6: no video during install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272991
You received this bug
doesn't seem to happen anymore.
--
Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Fixed somewhere along the line quite some time ago.
** Changed in: xcompmgr (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Transparent windows have opaque corners
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a d
Nah, it's long gone. This bug is ancient :)
--
Transparent windows have opaque corners
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34556
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Is it possible that this bug is affecting other applications too? I
occasionally (but not nearly as often) see similar behavior in Firefox -
it hangs for a few seconds and then eventually 'catches up' and goes
through all the keyboard/mouse movements in high speed (this is without
synergy installe
This looks very similar to bug #91540, in case that helps anyone. I had
that problem back in the day, and now it's happening again... :(
--
2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Attachment added: "partman"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12683660/partman
--
Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Oops! Sorry, forgot to mention :)
amd64 desktop
--
Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Public bug reported:
I installed from Hardy Alpha 3 CD in a tri-boot configuration -
/dev/sda1 Windows XP
/dev/sda2 Hardy
/dev/sda3 Gutsy
After installation completed, I could no longer boot Windows. It gave a
message that autochk.exe could not be found. After tracking down the
problem via Goog
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: e2fsprogs
I did a fresh install into a 20G partition, checked the "format" box in
the manual partition editor on the Hardy Alpha 3 CD, and everything
installed fine. Rebooted, and it booted fine... until I hit fsck.
It then said that the "root primary s
This also happens if you compile synergy from source.
--
Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91540
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I have the same problem with a Mac OS X synergy server and feisty as the
client.
--
Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91540
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
I dist-upgraded to feisty the other day, and openoffice no longer works.
Attempting to run oowriter, oomath, etc exits immediately (no startup
screen or graphics at all) with "Floating Point exception"
- strace is here:
- e
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
I dist-upgraded to feisty the other day, and openoffice no longer works.
Attempting to run oowriter, oomath, etc exits immediately (no startup
screen or graphics at all) with "Floating Point exception"
strace is attached.
** Affects: open
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66467 ***
Ah, my apologies. I searched but somehow managed to avoid finding the
duplicated bug :)
--
gnunet needs to depend on gmp, but doesn't
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80389
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnunet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install gnunet-gtk
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
gnunet libextractor1c2a libltdl3
Suggested packag
My system soon after that decided to give up entirely, to the point
where there were more broken things than working. I decided to
reinstall from the latest edgy beta... sorry I can't do as you asked.
Maybe I just caught an unlucky combination of package versions that
conspired to wreck my system.
I have these:
/
/usr
/var
/home
/boot
on separate partitions. /boot is ext3 and the rest are jfs. All are, of
course, marked to mount at boot.
--
Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
And to my knowledge I have not messed with the logging facilities
much...
--
Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
85-ifupdown.rules does exist.
/var/log/udev does not exist.
--
Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Interesting. Looking at /etc/init.d/networking, it logs a message
saying "Configuring network interfaces..." and then runs ifup... But
maybe I'm just confused.
Anyway, here's ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8D:7E:90:D7
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Whoops, sorry, brain fart there :p
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/event.d/
control-alt-delete rc0 rc0-poweroff rc2 rc4 rc6 rcS-sulogin tty1
tty3 tty5
rc-default rc0-halt rc1 rc3 rc5 rcS sulogin tty2
tty4 tty6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/event.d/rc0
# r
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: upstart
In single user ('single' appended to kernel command line) trying to
reboot causes rc6 to segfault (signal 15)
No other error comes up, and the system does not reboot.
A reboot -f does manage to reboot, although I imagine that this isn't
the pref
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: netbase
Worked fine in dapper, upgrade to edgy, eth0 doesn't come up any more (I
tried adding forcedeth to /etc/modules to no avail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
I tried a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mdadm
I've upgraded to edgy and just today-ish a new mdadm package came out.
I can't upgrade it, because /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid fails while trying to
stop /dev/md0 and /dev/md1. Trying to do a mdadm -S /dev/md0 fails as
well, even though it is not mounte
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: udev
I have several LVM VGs, each with multiple LVs. They are all assigned
disk labels such as "/backup" to reflect their purpose. I mount them
with LABEL=/backup type entries in /etc/fstab. This same fstab worked
on Dapper just fine, but now Edgy comp
54 matches
Mail list logo
