Re: [SM-USERS] December 31 1969 Issue

2007-02-02 Thread Nate Keegan
I finished a test on 1.4.9a and it simply omits the date from the message when viewing it, even with the view full date option turned on. I will upgrade our SM. Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hi Nate, > On Thursday, February 01, 2007, Nate wrote: > > I understand the security concern,

Re: [SM-USERS] December 31 1969 Issue

2007-02-01 Thread Nate Keegan
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1660935541-1006150416=:41149" I installed the current (1.4.9a) version of SM with PHP 5.2.0 to see if the problem persists, waiting on access to a user's mailbox by the user to confirm. Rainer Sokoll wrote: > On Thu, Feb

[SM-USERS] December 31 1969 Issue

2007-02-01 Thread Nate Keegan
I am running Squirrelmail 1.2.7 on FreeBSD 4.5, Apache1.3.26, PHP 4.2.2. The system has worked flawlessly for several years and we don't like to mess with things that are working... I have noticed from time to time that I will get an email which shows a date (when viewing the email) of December 3

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-31 Thread nate
nate wrote: > I'll try to find some other web debugging plugins for firefox > to see if that gives more insight. Some good progress, from my last half dozen tests it appears I cannot reproduce the problem if I go directly to SM 1.4.9a In the past when I upgraded SM I put it off a su

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-31 Thread nate
nate wrote: > just when I thought I made some progress... > I went to my ubuntu laptop with firefox 1.5.0.8 and the frame > still vanishes even after physically restarting. Also with > Mozilla 1.7.12 under Ubuntu(which for me unlike firefox I have > no plugins installed in m

Re: [SM-USERS] Memory Allocations

2007-01-24 Thread nate
ini to > allow a max memory size of 128M. > > What do the rest of you have this set to? I may be mis-reading the error but it seems the max memory size is set to 16M not 128M judging by the error above.. nate - Take Su

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
nate wrote: > I've left plugins off all night and so far I have not been able to > reproduce the problem in firefox 1.5. But in IE 6.0 I still get it > every time. I'll leave plugins off for another day or so and see if > I can get it to happen again. In IE6 I don't

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
time when I removed the plugins was physically restarting the browser as well(no idea why that does the trick but it does). Prior attempts I just logged out then logged back in. driving me nuts here. thanks again! nate ---

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-24 Thread nate
I'll try to give that a shot tomorrow, midnight here now gotta be up early tomorrow. I do appreciate the help and patience! thanks nate - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay p

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
e it..easier on my eyes in the dark :) ), I tested it with Ice and Maize with the same results. also tried removing my preferences and starting with a fresh slate and that had no impact either. my SM is possessed! thanks again nate

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
nate said: > Paul Lesniewski said: > >> Since clicking on one of these links loads the page in the parent >> frame, but the links clearly have target="right", unless the frameset >> code (feel free to show that too) is somehow borked (bad HTML or that >> fra

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
is the newer versions of SM. I suppose I'm just stuck with 1.4.1 till I can find another webmail client.. sigh nate -- This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially dangerous content has been rewritten or removed. The following log describes which actions were ta

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
; the HTML that gets to your browser, etc. I'm currently on my LAN, and there is no proxies or filters(the server is 2 hops from my laptop). thanks again, I really appreciate the assistance! nate -- This message has been 'sanitized'. This means that potentially dangerous conte

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
Jonathan Angliss said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi nate, Hey! whats happenin > I've grepped the stable source code, and cannot find any reference to > the above javascript code. I've even gone down to just "frames", and >

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
nate said: > Tomas Kuliavas said: > >> You get zero sized response. I think some PHP versions do that on >> memory_limit error. > > You are right! I was looking again at IE6 and when the problem > happened I checked that litt

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-23 Thread nate
extension, other servers don't support options used by > SquirrelMail in sorting commands. cyrus should break only in Korean > translation. I checked, it is not enabled. Also didn't see any errors pop up in my apache error log when the issue appeared. thanks again! nate ---

Re: [SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-22 Thread nate
7;t exist in Sarge, it was removed as part of the upgrade from woody). and the behavior didn't change when I removed it while using Woody(about a year ago). thanks again!! nate - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence t

[SM-USERS] folder frame vanishing re-visited..

2007-01-20 Thread nate
om the output before I can post it. SM has been a great app, but my inability to upgrade it has been wearing on me this past year or so. thanks! nate - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net'

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
o get more useful information. Last night I left SM open all night and it was fine while I was using it last night, though in the morning(logged in all night), the behavior started up again. I'll leave it open all night again tonight, and see what happens. nate ---

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
Paul Lesneiwski wrote: > On 1/25/06, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> nate wrote: >> >> > it is back to frame not dissapearing again under firefox. > > I don't understand exactly. You say the folder list frame is > "disappearing" but then y

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
s in the error log for apache either. thanks nate --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfi

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
nate wrote: > it is back to frame not dissapearing again under firefox. > I was in the process of enabling http access and giving my > account a temporary password so I could tcpdump the output > but can't reproduce it right now under http or https. forgot I had ssldump, since

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
nate wrote: > confirmed that php error logging is turned up, I have another > php app(ldapexplorer) which is showing some warnings which > were not showing before I turned up the logging it is back to frame not dissapearing again under firefox. I was in the process of enabling http a

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-25 Thread nate
nate wrote: > I changed it so it is only E_ALL and restarted apache and I do > not see any additional messages. The frame dissapearing is occuring > 100% of the time on firefox at the moment with SM 1.4.6. confirmed that php error logging is turned up, I have another php app(ldapexplor

Re: [SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-24 Thread nate
testing the versions out, and see if it stabilizes. I don't see any errors returned to my browser(visible at least) and there are no errors in the apache logs(other than the usual attempts trying to retrieve favicon.ico) thanks again, restarting apache would of been one of the last t

[SM-USERS] left frame disappears on 1.4.5 & 1.4.6rc1

2006-01-24 Thread nate
tls1.1.11+tls0.7. TLS and SASL support for Postfix running debian 3.0 (i386) any ideas? thanks nate --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX sear

Re: [SM-USERS] Can't View INBOX

2003-05-31 Thread Nate Sanders
Doh, stupid me listing sendmail. It's been a hellish week. I'm running UW's Imap-2002b. I'll try removing pref files, but I think you're on to something with their Folders. My INBOX stores only 80 emails or so. Some of these dolts were storing 600 emails in their INBOX. I have about 11 other Fold

[SM-USERS] Can't View INBOX

2003-05-31 Thread Nate Sanders
To sum up the problem: Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /home/httpd/ssldocs/squirrelmail/functions/imap_general.php on line 489 Now to clarify some things. I have all ready read: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/NewUserCannotLogin and these did help point me in

[SM-USERS] Users Cannot Login

2003-05-29 Thread Nate Sanders
To sum up the problem: Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /home/httpd/ssldocs/squirrelmail/functions/imap_general.php on line 489 Now to clarify some things. I have all ready read: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/NewUserCannotLogin and these did help point me in

[SM-USERS] Strange Address Book Problem

2002-11-19 Thread Nate Keegan
Setup: Squirrelmail 1.2.7 Problem: We recently moved from MS Exchange to a Courier/LDAP/Squirrelmail system. As part of that migration we were able to use some Perl fu to convert Outlook PAB to Squirrelmail abook files. We just had one user who had a strange problem. We have figured out what caus

Re: [SM-USERS] Sanitizer w/squirrelmail (mime type application/defanged)

2002-11-02 Thread nate
x27;t view it in SM, I can probably adjust the plugin code again to provide a view link though, I don't know PHP so its not that easy to look through the code) thanks! nate --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm

Re: [SM-USERS] Sanitizer w/squirrelmail (mime type application/defanged)

2002-11-02 Thread nate
nate said: > options in sanitizer since it was defanging everything even > messages with mime of text/plain. I too am using the default > config. no luck, trying out SM 1.2.9 and i turned Sanitizer back on and sent a message which was sanitized, and SM couldn't view it, just showe

Re: [SM-USERS] Sanitizer w/squirrelmail (mime type application/defanged)

2002-11-01 Thread nate
Mike Morrell said: > Hi Nate, > > > I am running version 1.55 of Sanitizer with SQM 1.28 without problems. > I am using the default configuration for sanitizer. hmm, ok well that sounds encouraging! I have Sanitizer v 1.49, but debian testing has 1.55 available, so it should be

[SM-USERS] Sanitizer w/squirrelmail (mime type application/defanged)

2002-11-01 Thread nate
Match (rule="default"): Enforced policy: defang Replaced mime type with: application/DEFANGED-5211 Replaced file name with: unnamed_txt.DEFANGED-5211 Total modifications so far: 1 anyone have experience with this? thanks! nate