RE: [SM-USERS] Problem with xml attachment

2006-04-10 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Thanks for your answer, > I tried to use evrythinnk like you said. > So I used SM 1.4.6 without any plugins but problem still remains. > I tried tou use other MUA to send xml message but result was good ( it > means postfix is not involved ) > So I'd like to provide you config.php ( without theme

Re: [SM-USERS] Reply prefix cannot be set to TAB (Again)

2006-04-10 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> I asked this question last week and didn’t get a response. I am asking > again: > > If you set the "Prefix for Original Message when Replying" to the Tab > character, it does not get saved past the current session. > > 1. login to squirrelmail > 2. click on options > 3. click display preferences

[SM-USERS] Reply prefix cannot be set to TAB (Again)

2006-04-10 Thread McCullough, Ryan
I asked this question last week and didn’t get a response. I am asking again: If you set the "Prefix for Original Message when Replying" to the Tab character, it does not get saved past the current session. 1. login to squirrelmail 2. click on options 3. click display preferences 4. set "Pref

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems using SquirrelMail 1.4.x on IIS 5.0

2006-04-10 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hello, > > I want to use SquirrelMail 1.4.5 or 1.4.6 on IIS 5.0. The installation > succeeded but when I log in I only get the two frames on the left and on > the right side shown with blank pages. After some seconds I get the > following error on the right frame: > > ERROR > Unknown User or pass

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread Alan in Toronto
eCet wrote: > This is for all develpoers of SM: > > I see, that You don't take care of my performance bugreport, and > feature request. You can't even say that you don't get my emails > through this list. > > I think, that I'm worthy to get a reply for my emails. > > What You are doing, is spinele

Re: [SM-USERS] Problems using SquirrelMail 1.4.x on IIS 5.0

2006-04-10 Thread Sasa Stupar
--On 10. april 2006 15:10 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I want to use SquirrelMail 1.4.5 or 1.4.6 on IIS 5.0. The installation succeeded but when I log in I only get the two frames on the left and on the right side shown with blank pages. After some seconds I get the following error o

[SM-USERS] Problems using SquirrelMail 1.4.x on IIS 5.0

2006-04-10 Thread stefan . moessner
Hello, I want to use SquirrelMail 1.4.5 or 1.4.6 on IIS 5.0. The installation succeeded but when I log in I only get the two frames on the left and on the right side shown with blank pages. After some seconds I get the following error on the right frame: ERROR Unknown User or password incorrec

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread eCet
Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: Sorry, we have other priorities. In the limited time I have next to my daytime job and personal life (which was almost destroyed due to my busy schedule)I also keep myself busy with SquirrelMail development. The last month I was working on centralised initialization cod

RE: [SM-USERS] Problem with xml attachment

2006-04-10 Thread Jevos, Peter
Dear Fredrik Thanks for your answer, I tried to use evrythinnk like you said. So I used SM 1.4.6 without any plugins but problem still remains. I tried tou use other MUA to send xml message but result was good ( it means postfix is not involved ) So I'd like to provide you config.php ( without th

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread eCet
Tomas Kuliavas wrote: Developers might be busy and working on other issues. If you think that you can enhance SquirrelMail thread sorting code, please provide patches for 1.5.1 or cvs HEAD version. I will make the patch right if I will have time for it. I had this question: "I think, that it

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
On Mon, April 10, 2006 09:40, eCet wrote: >> I agree. What we could do is if the message count in a folder > your >> supposed 5000 then do FETCH 1:* UID first (which is fast) and then take >> a slice of that. With the resulting id's we can create a message set and >> provide the UID search argumen

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>> I agree. What we could do is if the message count in a folder > your >> supposed 5000 then do FETCH 1:* UID first (which is fast) and then take >> a >> slice of that. With the resulting id's we can create a message set and >> provide the UID search argument to the thread call and we are done. >>

Re: [SM-USERS] Errors on thread view of over 20k messages folder

2006-04-10 Thread eCet
I agree. What we could do is if the message count in a folder > your supposed 5000 then do FETCH 1:* UID first (which is fast) and then take a slice of that. With the resulting id's we can create a message set and provide the UID search argument to the thread call and we are done. Regards, Marc