Re: [SM-USERS] PHP Error when trying to send

2003-01-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Indramin, On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Indramin Darmadi wrote... > Dear guru, > When I'm trying to send email from Squirrelmail (compose -> send), I got > this error : > *** > Syntax error in parameters or arguments > Server replied: 501 5.0.0 Invalid domain name > Warning: Cannot add

[SM-USERS] Filtering all mail to sm users

2003-01-15 Thread Tobias Eigen
Greetings, Is there an easy way in SM to filter mail to SM users so they can only receive mail from a single address? Many thanks for any assistance, Tobias Tobias Eigen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kabissa - space for change in Africa http://www.kabissa.org

[SM-USERS] PHP Error when trying to send

2003-01-15 Thread Indramin Darmadi
Dear guru, When I'm trying to send email from Squirrelmail (compose -> send), I got this error : *** Syntax error in parameters or arguments Server replied: 501 5.0.0 Invalid domain name Warning: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/share/squirrelmail

Re: [SM-USERS] Procmail Filter Configuration

2003-01-15 Thread William R. Mussatto
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, William R. Mussatto wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:35:26 -0800 (PST) > From: William R. Mussatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Procmail Filter Configuration > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, William R. Mussatto wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 14 Ja

Re: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Keith Mastin
>These are all very good questions. The IMAP/pop3 server is the one >that came with Debian linux (kernal 2.4.2). Trying to find >documentation on it has proven to be a real PIA. > >As for conversion...too many users to even think about trying to >change. We'd end up putting a lot more money i

RE: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread William R. Mussatto
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Brendan Pirie wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:48:21 -0500 > From: Brendan Pirie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SM-USERS] newbie #101 > > I'm using UW-IMAP and not having this problem. > > The problem I encounter is that any message moved from

Re: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Brendan, On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Brendan Pirie wrote... > I'm using UW-IMAP and not having this problem. > The problem I encounter is that any message moved from the inbox in > squirrelmail cannot be accessed via pop3. I understand why, but > getting my users to understand is a diff

RE: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Brendan Pirie
I'm using UW-IMAP and not having this problem. The problem I encounter is that any message moved from the inbox in squirrelmail cannot be accessed via pop3. I understand why, but getting my users to understand is a different issue, and the "real" problem. ;) I don't know whether this is an issue

Re: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Matt, On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Matt Barkdull wrote... > We are using SM and if people check their mail using the web > interface, the messages they display will then not be downloaded to > their POP3 clients when they check their mail with the client. What IMAP server are you using?

Re: [SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Keith Mastin
>Regarding POP3 and IMAP mixed. > > >We are using SM and if people check their mail using the web >interface, the messages they display will then not be downloaded to >their POP3 clients when they check their mail with the client. > >Making everything IMAP is not an option in this case. The only

[SM-USERS] newbie #101

2003-01-15 Thread Matt Barkdull
Regarding POP3 and IMAP mixed. We are using SM and if people check their mail using the web interface, the messages they display will then not be downloaded to their POP3 clients when they check their mail with the client. Making everything IMAP is not an option in this case. The only reason

Re: [SM-USERS] Logging in - have to log in twice?

2003-01-15 Thread Caffeinate The World
--- Andre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem with SquirrelMail 1.2.10(behavior also occured > on > 1.2.9). I reported this a few days ago. Upgrade to the latest 1.2.11-cvs snap shot, it fixed a session bug. __ Do you