e
programming language lexers.
Steve
On Jun 13, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Gian Maria Ricci wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions, I’ll try with the WordDelimiterFilterFactory. My
> aim is not to have a perfect analysis, just a way to quick search for words
> in the whole history of a codebas
On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> mapping="mapping-FoldToASCII"/>
The mapping attribute above is missing the .txt file extension:
Steve
r reasons you'd want to choose one over the other that I'm not
thinking of, but primarily it's about choosing processing order to affect
further stages in the pipeline. If you don't think order matters, then you
should be fine choosing either one.
Steve
On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:1
out of
> Solr?
>
> Regards,
> Esteban
To use your example, you could query
stats.field=value1&stats.field=value2&stats.facet=doc_id and calculate
sum(value1)/sum(value2) in a Velocity template. I'm not sure it's a *good*
solution, but that's a way you could get the results you want in the response
from Solr.
Steve
So, I have a bunch of products indexed in Solr. Each product may exist in any
number of product categories. The product category field is therefore
multivalued in Solr. This allow us to show categories a product exists in.
Now, instead we want to browse the products by category. This also works
From: Chris Hostetter
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" ; Steve Fatula
>
>Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 5:42 PM
>Subject: Re: Faceting a multi valued field
>
>
>how are you modeling the tree nature of your cateory taxonomy when you
>index the terms? if
From: Chris Hostetter
>To: Steve Fatula
>Cc: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 7:17 PM
>Subject: Re: Faceting a multi valued field
>
>: A > B > C > D > E
>: Z > C > D > E
>: Z > C > F > G > H > E
>From: Chris Hostetter
>To: Steve Fatula
>Cc: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 7:17 PM
>Subject: Re: Faceting a multi valued field
>
>
>you can the
>level and most of the path and just index the "${parent_cat_id}:${cat_i
We get at rare times out of memory errors during the day. I know one reason for
this is data imports, none are going on. I see in the wiki, document adds have
some quirks, not doing that. I don't know to to expect for memory use though.
We had Solr running under Tomcat set to 2G ram. I presume c
From: Otis Gospodnetic
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 2:51 PM
>Subject: Re: Out of memory, not during import or updates of the index
>
>Hi,
>
>Some options:
>* Yes, on the slave/search side you can reduce your cache sizes and lower the
>memory footprint.
>*
From: Paul Libbrecht
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 7:19 AM
>Subject: Re: Out of memory, not during import or updates of the index
>
>do you have any custom code in your Solr?
>We had out-of-memory errors just because of that, I was using one method to
>obta
From: "Husain, Yavar"
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:43 AM
>Subject: Solr Indexing Time
>
>However while using Solr on a VM, with 4 GB RAM it took 50 minutes to index at
>the first time. Note that there is no Network delays and no RAM issues. Now
>when I
From: Andre Bois-Crettez
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 7:02 AM
>Subject: Re: Out of memory, not during import or updates of the index
>
>You can add JVM parameters to better trace the heap usage with
>-XX:+PrintGCDetails -verbose:gc -Xloggc:/your/gc/logfil
From: Mark Miller
>To: solr-user
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 3:00 PM
>Subject: Re: Out of memory, not during import or updates of the index
>
>How big is your index?
>
>The total for the data dir is 651M.
>What kind of queries do you tend to see? Do you facet on a lot of fields? Sort
>o
Hello All,
I have my field description listed below, but I don't think its pertinent. As
my issue seems to be with the query parser.
I'm currently using an edismax subquery clause to help with my searching as
such:
_query_:"{!type=edismax qf='ref_expertise'}\(nonlinear OR soliton\) AND
\"opti
e
requirements. Is there some other way I could be executing this query even in
the single field case?
Thanks and Thanks in Advance for all help
Steve
On Dec 6, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, does this help?
>
> In Solr 1.4 and prior, you should basically set mm=0
Hi Everybody,
How can we read e-mail content in PST file of the storage of Microsoft
outlook. It is not the e-mail at the exchange server.
Thanks
Regards
Shu (Steve) Chen
Tel: 425-818-0568
Fax: 425-641-8908
Cell: 425-785-9971
Greetings,
I am new to Solr, but have gotten as far as successfully indexing
documents both by sending XML describing the document and by sending the
document itself using "update/extract". What I want to do now is, in
effect, do both of these on each of my documents. I want to be able to
h
g messages like the above? Should we just change the lock to
simple?
Thanks,
Steve Cohen
So how would one set it up to use multiple nodes for building an index? I
see a document for solr + hadoop (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HadoopIndexing)
and it says it has an example but the example is missing.
Thanks,
Steve Cohen
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jak Akdemir wrote:
> If
Can anyone help me on how to remove myself from this mailing list. The
emails don't come with an opt-out link nor can I find anywhere else to
go to remove my email address. Any help would be really appreciated!
Steve
says:
Solr looks for the external file in the index directory
under the name of external_ or external_.*"
I think the intent here is that "the index directory" is the directory
*containing* the index directory, rather than the index directory itself.
Steve
On Nov 19, 201
Hi Artyom,
The lucene_solr_4_0 branch IntelliJ setup works for me.
Sounds like Ivy isn't succeeding in downloading dependencies.
'ant idea' calls 'ant resolve', which uses Apache Ivy to download binary
dependencies.
Can you post output from running 'ant resolve&
Hi Artyom,
I don't use IntelliJ artifacts - I just edit/compile/test.
I can include this stuff in the IntelliJ configuration if you'll help me. Can
you share screenshots of what you're talking about, and/or IntelliJ config
files?
Steve
On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Artyom wr
x27;s more
sensible anyway, since that's the official/supported build.
Steve
On Dec 6, 2012, at 7:06 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Why do this? It's trivial to attach IntelliJ to a running solr, just create
> "remote" configuration. When you do, it'll give you parame
using it on synonyms in the
same field.
Steve
On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Query parsers cannot fix the IDF problem or make query-time synonyms faster.
> Query synonym expansion makes more search terms. More search terms are more
> work at query time
Hmm, I've gotten this very wrong :) - DisjunctionMaxQuery will operate per-doc,
so using it in the way I suggested will not allow for synonym IDF leveling
across documents. Also, scoring obviously includes more factors than IDF.
On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> But
In addition to reindexing, you should insure that your query analyzer has the
same lowercasing behavior as your index analyzer. Otherwise "july" may not
match "July", and vice versa.
On Dec 17, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Sangeetha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done anything in my schema.xml for phoneti
Hi Alexandre,
CombiningFilter sounds close (no option to put spaces between original terms),
but hasn't yet been committed:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3413>.
Steve
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to ta
Hi bibhor,
I looked at <http://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdot> and
<http://www.feedforall.com/sample.xml>, and their top-level structure is:
...
This doesn't match your or your
Steve
On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:02 PM, bibhor wrote:
> Hi,
> I did try anot
> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 a
January 2013, Apache Solr™ 4.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.1.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted searc
Thanks for reporting Alex, I'll take care of it. - Steve
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Not even sure whom to tell: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html (v4
> of the tutorial is there, v3 of the tutorial is a dead link).
>
> Regards,
>
This is fixed now. Thanks again, Alex. - Steve
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Not even sure whom to tell: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html (v4
> of the tutorial is there, v3 of the tutorial is a dead link).
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> P
Or on Central:
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.solr%22
On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Miguel Ángel Martín
wrote:
> Hi Lu:
>
> Look at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/solr/
>
> ;-)
> El 28/01/2013 20:10, "Luis Cappa Banda" esc
WhitespaceTokenizer extends CharTokenizer, which has a hard-coded token length
limit of 256 chars. I think adding configurability for this should be fairly
simple. Patches welcome!
Steve
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:14 AM, prakash_m16 wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I would like to know how to inc
On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Laptop disks are slower than the EC2 disks.
My laptop disk is an SSD.
ggestion: don't use nabble for posting to mailing lists. Or put code
snippets up on a third-party text sharing facility, e.g. pastebin, github gist,
etc.
Steve
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:10 PM, PeterKerk wrote:
> Ok, something went wrong with posting the code,since I did not escape the
&
See also Adrien Grand's blog post on this feature (he implemented it):
<http://blog.jpountz.net/post/35667727458/stored-fields-compression-in-lucene-4-1>
Steve
On Feb 20, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> bq: Does the new compressed stored field format in Solr 4.1
Hi Isaac,
Can you describe the problem? E.g., what do you mean by "ignores"?
Usually sample inputs and expected outputs help.
Steve
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:25 PM, Isaac Hebsh wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to configure a stored-, non-indexed field, to be multiValu
Hi Ankush,
Instructions for subscribing, and other info about the Solr mailing lists, are
here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
Steve
On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Ankush Puri wrote:
> Hi,
> I've started using solr from last day only.I must say it's rea
Kristian,
I think what you want is pattern="<[^>]>" (untested) - that is, you
probably don't want to regex-escape the character class brackets "[" and "]",
and you should html-escape the angle brackets.
Steve
On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:42 AM, "
ot;`something", new String[] { "`something" });
But these two succeed:
assertAnalyzesTo(a, "tre'ma", new String[] { "tre'ma" });
assertAnalyzesTo(a, "pen~a", new String[] { "pen~a" });
I'm not sure if backticks should be folded away by ICUFoldingFilter, but if
they are, then I think we should be consistent and also fold away other
characters like it.
Steve
the best, since it would address concerns of users who don't
want the schema to be modifiable.
I look forward to hearing others' thoughts on these and any other issues
related to dynamic schema modification.
Thanks,
Steve
other concern is about schema "ownership": dealing with schemas that mix
hand-editing with Solr modification/serialization would likely be harder than
supporting just one of them. But I suppose there is already a set of validity
checks, so maybe this wouldn't be so bad?
Steve
O
orted.
Steve
On Mar 6, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Hmm…I think I'm missing some pieces.
>
> I agree with Erick that you should be able to load a schema from any object -
> a DB, a file in ZooKeeper, you name it. But it seems by default, having that
> object be sche
On Mar 6, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> I'm not sure what pieces you might be missing, sorry.
>
> My main confusion is around this:
>
> bq. When schema.xml is present, schema.json (if any) will be ignored
onship
between the two wouldn't be represented in the request.
Maybe if there were requests that returned the collections using a particular
named config, and vice versa, people could at least discover problematic
dependencies before they send schema modificaiton requests? Or maybe such
requests already exist?
Steve
If it's config it's config and the user owns it.
> If it's data it's data and the system owns it.
Calling the system-owned file 'schema.dat', rather than 'schema.json' (i.e.,
extension=format), would help to reinforce this black-box view.
Steve
On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> multiple collections may share the same config set and thus schema, so what
>> happens if someone does not know this and hits PUT
>> localhost:8983/solr/collection1/schema and it affects also the schema for
>> collect
attern for a
referenced dynamic field".
I'll make a copy of that table and add a case where the source value type can
be a glob matching one or more explicit fields.
Steve
I committed a fix under SOLR-4567.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 12:50 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Yes, this is a regression, definitely my fault. Sorry Alex!
>
> The table on SOLR-3798 is missing this case: a glob matching one or more
> explicit fields (as opposed to dynamic fields).
>
del, especially its "comsumeAllTokens" option. I think this would make a
nice addition to Lucene.
Also, what do you plan to use this for?
Steve
On Mar 16, 2013, at 5:02 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to use shingles but only keep the ones that start from the edge.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4843
Let me know if it works for you.
Steve
On Mar 16, 2013, at 5:35 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> I read too fast your reply, so I thought you meant configuring the
> LimitTokenPositionFilter. I see you mean I have to write o
Hi xavier,
Cool, thanks for the feedback, I'll commit later today (unless somebody
objects), so it will be part of the Lucene/Solr 4.3 release.
Steve
On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:21 PM, xavier jmlucjav wrote:
> Steve, worked like a charm.
> thanks!
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 20
[…] use multiple copyField directives, each
giving an explicit field name. So the above example using this workaround would
be:
-
Steve
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> I am still trying to figure out Solr release cadence. They seem to be
> pretty fr
m like a feature people would
like. Is there any plan to implement it? Or even better a patch that I could
apply?
thanks in advance
steve
Hello and Thanks for the reply.
I've been over that page, and it doesn't seem like it helps with the pivoting
aspect.
That is if I am sorting via an existing pivot 'sum(student_id,test_grade)' I
want my groups of student_id sorted by the sum of test_grade with that
student_id.
The data is all
_flag:*
?
Thanks in advance.
steve
ions I can
do on collapsed groups as a whole. They are more of a display thing that can't
be referenced in the query. Same thing with facets? Am I right in this?
steve
thansk again
steve
On Jan 22, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Does http://wiki.apache.
t, while others would.
I can do it in post processing, but that will mess up sorting and pagination.
Thanks again
steve
On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
> Steve,
>
> and what exactly do you expect? You can work on the Group itself with
> http://wiki.apac
o
do something similar, so I may just have unrealistic expectations of what a
search engine will do.
Thanks in advance!
Steve
- shouldn't that be 2011-03-03T23:59:59.999Z
From: Steve Lewis
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 11:21:53 AM
Subject: Limiting on dates in Solr
I am treating Solr as a NoSQL db that has great search capabilities. I am
querying on a few f
a separate table just for inventory
and related it back to the SKU with a foreign key. How do I store size and
inventory information effectively with Solr?
--
Steve
gt; the faceting on variant inventory.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Cerny [mailto:sjce...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:29 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Product data schema question
>
> I'm working on an online eCommer
ly have one
> key.
>
> You could use two cores with two configurations (but that presumably
> wouldn't be much help).
>
> Solr is not a DBMS. It is an index.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Cerny [mailto:sjce...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2
e bad part is that it is
searching for any one of those split words.
Steve
>From: Vadim Kisselmann
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 4:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>in your schema.xml you can set the default query parser operator, in
>your case , but it's
>deprecated.
>
>
>I
>From: Ahmet Arslan
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:22 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>> So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
>> AND when it is splitting words? The splitting part is good,
&g
From: Joel Rosen
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Cc: Ahmet Arslan ; Tom Burton-West
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>
>I and another user recently posted about this exact same issue. It sounds
>like maybe this is a
From: Joel Rosen
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula
>Cc: Ahmet Arslan ; Tom Burton-West
>Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
>Subject: Re: Dismax Question
>
>I and another user recently posted about this exact same issue. It sounds
>like maybe this is a
It turns out that Solr 3.5.0 does not have the dismax issue, so, we have
reverted. Hopefully, the bug will be fixed.
replacing sensitive details).
For the life of me I cannot figure out what is causing the rollback and how
to suppress the behavior. Any help would be much appreciated.
--
Steve
sjce...@gmail.com
Does anyone have any ideas on the issue noted below?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Steve wrote:
> Hello, I have a simple Solr core setup to index 500 store locations with
> their corresponding latitude / longitude. The core is setup, running, and
> importing correctly however I
Hi Kevin,
Solrj 4.0.0 is on Maven Central now, and has been since Oct. 11th:
<http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.solr%7Csolr-solrj%7C4.0.0%7Cjar>
Steve
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> Thanks for that idea. The problem was that my So
Hi Spadez,
Nabble has helpfully stripped out your script. Maybe don't use Nabble?
Steve
On Nov 16, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Spadez wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I am after a bash script (or python script) which I can use to trigger a
> delta import of XML files via CRON. After a b
to all drivers placed in /lib.
Regards,
Steve
2009/9/22 Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Steve Sun wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spent a whole day trying to make "batchSize" work for JdbcDataSource
> with
> > "org.postgresql.Driver", but got frustrated. At last I
Am I correct in thinking that trie fields don't support
sortMissingLast (my tests show that they don't). If not, is there any
plan for adding it in?
Regards,
Steve
I just noticed this comment in the default schema:
Does that mean TrieFields are never going to get sortMissingLast?
Do you all think that a reasonable strategy is to use a copyField and
use "s" fields for sorting (only), and trie for everything else?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:59
> Not in time for 1.4, but yes they will eventually get it.
> It has to do with the representation... currently we can't tell
> between a 0 and "missing".
Hmm. So does that mean that a query for latitudes, stored as trie
floats, from -10 to +10 matches documents with no (i.e. null) latitude
value
g to trie ranges and that hasn't helped - are
there any other tricks around accomplishing "not null" that would turn
the query around faster?
-Steve
done?
Anything I could be specifically caching?
Regards,
Steve
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Steve Conover wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a query that's taking about 120ms to run that I'd like to try
>> t
> Lowering the precisionStep of the trie field could help. With a
> precisionStep of 8, there would be 256 top-level terms to step over.
> If you lowered it to 6, it would cut it to 64 or 4 would cut it to 16.
>
> The fastest would be to index a separate field to indicate presence or
> absence of
, and anything else you think is relevant?
Much appreciated
-Steve
Does no one send solr logging to syslog?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Steve Conover wrote:
> The solution involves slf4j to log4j to syslog (at least, for solr),
> but I'm having some trouble stringing all the parts together. If
> anyone is doing this, would you mind posti
Now I'm looking at all the solr plugins
that get loaded at startup that I don't use and wondering whether
getting rid of those would help.
But before jumping off into jar manipulation I figured I'd pose this
question to the group - what would you do?
-Steve
is in place). I've tried turning off all
caching, to no effect.
Anyone have any idea what could be going on here? Ideally,
would be an operation that blocks until the exact moment when the new
searcher is in place and is actually serving based on the new index
state...
-Steve
Yep, I notice the default is true/true, but I explicitly specified
both those things too and there's no difference in behavior.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Steve Conover wrote:
>
>> I'm doing some testing
That's exactly what I'm doing, but I'm explicitly replicating, and
committing. Even under these circumstances, what could explain the
delay after commit before the new index becomes available?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009
x27;d like to get response times down to near-instantaneous / <
50ms (which is where they were when the index was ~ 1 millions
documents). I'd love to hear suggestions - in particular are there
obvious optimization options I've missed?
Regards,
Steve
> Steve,
>
> Maybe you can tell us about:
sure
> - your hardware
2.5GB RAM, pretty modern virtual servers
> - query rate
Let's say a few queries per second max... < 4
And in general the challenge is to get latency on any given query down
to something very low - we don&
..I'm wondering what factors are involved
here.
-Steve
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
>
> OK, we are a step closer. Sorting makes things slower. What field(s) do you
> sort on, what are their types, and if there is a date in there, are the dates
> v
String ;-) - we only allow sorting on string fields.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> A field named "name" sounds like a free text field. What is its type, string
> or text? Fields you sort by should not be tokenized and should
e memory at the problem? If so, could you explain a little bit
about why?
Regards,
Steve
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
>
> OK, how about this trick then. Do you really need the full string for
> sorting? Could you get by (cheat) sorting only on the first N ch
It's not distributed, but I like Tokyo Cabinet. Tokyo Tyrant adds
http on top, I've never used Tyrant though.
-Steve
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Peter Keane wrote:
> Hi All-
>
> I've just recently began playing with Apache Solr, and it seems to be
> a perfec
this sense that I'm just missing something obvious (?)
Regards,
Steve
added in a
long time / ever. Once a set of documents is posted to /update, if I
re-post it solr behaves pretty well - and that's true even if I
restart solr.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Steve Conover wrote:
>> I'm using lat
> How solr organized so that search can continue when a commit has closed the
> index?
> Also, looking at lucene docs, commit causes a system fsync(). Won't search
> also
> get blocked by the IO traffic generated?
...I'll run iostat too and see if there's anything interesting to report
Hi there,
Can the option be used by the DisMaxRequestHandler?
Thanks,
-Steve
301 - 400 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
