> Lowering the precisionStep of the trie field could help. With a > precisionStep of 8, there would be 256 top-level terms to step over. > If you lowered it to 6, it would cut it to 64 or 4 would cut it to 16. > > The fastest would be to index a separate field to indicate presence or > absence of your field. > So instead of > myfield:[* TO *] > use > field_present:myfield > or > -field_absent:myfield
I'll try both of these, thanks for the suggestions.
