I just noticed this comment in the default schema:
<!--
These types should only be used for back compatibility with existing
indexes, or if "sortMissingLast" functionality is needed. Use
Trie based fields instead.
-->
Does that mean TrieFields are never going to get sortMissingLast?
Do you all think that a reasonable strategy is to use a copyField and
use "s" fields for sorting (only), and trie for everything else?
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Steve Conover <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that trie fields don't support
> sortMissingLast (my tests show that they don't). If not, is there any
> plan for adding it in?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
