Thanks Jay, if we come to a reasonable solution are you interested in the
details?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT
<jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov>wrote:

> No, I don't think so.  A given core can only use one configuration and
> therefore only one schema, as far as I know, and a schema can only have one
> key.
>
> You could use two cores with two configurations (but that presumably
> wouldn't be much help).
>
> Solr is not a DBMS.  It is an index.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Cerny [mailto:sjce...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 11:37 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Product data schema question
>
> Jay, this is great information.
>
> I don't know enough about Solr whether this is possible...Can we setup two
> indexes in the same core, one for product_catalog and the other for
> inventory?  Then using a Solr query we could join the indexed content
> together.
>
> In Sql it would look like this
>
> select
>  p.brand
>  , p.model_name
>  , p.sku
>  , p.color_name
>  , i.variant_id
>  , i.variant_count
> from product_catalog p
> join inventory i on (p.sku = i.sku)
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT <jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov
> >wrote:
>
> > On the surface, you could simply add some more fields to your schema.
>  But
> > as far as I can tell, you would have to have a separate Solr "document"
> for
> > each SKU/size combination,  and store the rest of the information (brand,
> > model, color, SKU) redundantly and make the unique key a combination of
> the
> > SKU and the size (presumably by having an additional field called
> sku_size -
> > as far as I can tell Solr can't make a key up out of multiple fields).
> >
> > But, perhaps you shouldn't store that dynamic inventory information in
> > Solr.   Instead store a key that gets you to an inventory database
> organized
> > by SKU and size.  In such a schema, Size could be added as a multi-valued
> > field to your existing schema, so you would know what sizes existed, so
> you
> > could at least facet on that, maybe.  That way Solr doesn't have to be
> > updated every time the inventory changes.  Of course, that won't help
> with
> > the faceting  on variant inventory.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Cerny [mailto:sjce...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:29 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Product data schema question
> >
> > I'm working on an online eCommerce project and am having difficulties
> > building the core / index schema.  Here is the way we organize our
> product
> > information in a normalized database.
> >
> > A product model has many SKUs (called colorways)
> > A SKU has many sizes (called variants)
> > A SKU size has associated inventory (called variant inventory)
> >
> > When we setup our product core we have the following field information
> >
> > Doc
> > * brand
> > * model name
> > * SKU
> > * color name
> >
> > Sample records are as follows
> >
> > * Haynes, Undershirt, 1234, white
> > * Haynes, Undershirt, 1235, grey
> > * Fruit of the Loom, Undershirt, 1236, white
> > * Fruit of the Loom, Underwear, 1237, grey
> >
> > The issue I'm having is I want to add inventory to each size of each SKU
> > for
> > faceting.  Example,
> >
> > SKU 1234 has sizes small, medium, large.  Size small has 5 in stock, size
> > medium 10, and size large 25.
> >
> > In a normalized data table I would have a separate table just for
> inventory
> > and related it back to the SKU with a foreign key.  How do I store size
> and
> > inventory information effectively with Solr?
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Steve
>



-- 
Steve Cerny
sjce...@gmail.com
715-302-0639

Reply via email to