Hi Erik/David,
Schema is same on both live and stage servers. We are using the same schema
files on the stage and live files.
- Schema files are included in replication but these are not being
changed whenever we are observing schema corruption issue.
- My guess is that because of repli
hi sorry if this a little bit out ouf topic,
i've just started to using banana dashboard. and i want to do summarize
proccess from data that indexed in solr
can i do sum proccess with banana dashboard when i have some multivalued
data index on my field?
this is my sample data on solr :
"ti
Hi,
We have 1 million of documents and would like to query with multiple fq values.
We have kept the access_control ( multi value field ) which holds information
about for which group that document is accessible.
Now to get the list of all the documents of an user, we would like to pass
multip
First of all, from what I can see, this won't do what you're expecting.
Multiple fq conditions are always combined using AND, so if a user is
member of 100 groups, but the document is accessible to only 99 of them,
then the user won't find it.
Or in other words, if you add a user to some group
On 3/16/2017 6:02 AM, Ganesh M wrote:
> We have 1 million of documents and would like to query with multiple fq
> values.
>
> We have kept the access_control ( multi value field ) which holds information
> about for which group that document is accessible.
>
> Now to get the list of all the docum
Hi,
We are using DIH with cache(SortedMapBackedCache) with solr 5.3.1. We have
around 2.8 million documents in solr and total index size is 4 GB. DIH
delta import is dumping all values of mapped columns to their respective
multi valued fields. This is causing size of one solr document upto 2 GB.
I
Could you give a bit more details. Do you mean one document gets the
content of multiple documents? And only on delta?
Regards,
Alex
On 16 Mar 2017 8:53 AM, "Sujay Bawaskar"
wrote:
Hi,
We are using DIH with cache(SortedMapBackedCache) with solr 5.3.1. We have
around 2.8 million documents i
Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious -- I'm new to Solr, but I can't
seem to find an explanation for the behavior I'm seeing.
If I have a document that looks like this:
{
field1: "aaa bbb",
field2: "ccc ddd",
field3: "eee fff"
}
And I do a search where "q" is "aaa ccc", I get t
Hi,
I'm working with a product which includes solr under the covers, and
this has been secured using a custom authentication scheme. The admin UI on
port 8983 works correct once authenticated. I've also hacked the zkcli.sh
script thusly:
SOLR_ZK_CREDS_AND_ACLS="-DzkACLProvider=com.i2group.dis
iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value.
I tried reindexing a few documents back into the problematic cloud and am
getting the same behavior of no document found for get handler.
I've also done some testing on standalone instances as well as some quick
cloud setups (with embedded zk), an
Hi,
Recently I migrated from solr 4 to 6
IN solr 4 shinglefilterfactory is working correctly
my configration i
But after updating to solr 6 shingles is not working ,schema
This behaviour is for delta import only. One document get field values of
all documents. These fields are child entities which maps column to multi
valued fields.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Could you give a bit more details. Do y
If you have the test bed, could you just enable full trace log mode and run
two most similar tests. Then look for log difference.
It sounds like a bug, but of what kind...?
Regards,
Alex
On 16 Mar 2017 9:16 AM, "Chris Ulicny" wrote:
> iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value.
>
> I
Any help on this please?
From: Mikhail Ibraheem
Sent: 15 مارس, 2017 08:53 م
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Group by range results
Hi,
Can we group by ranges? something like:
facet=true
stats=true
stats.field={!tag=piv1 min=true max=true}price
facet.range={!tag=r1}manufactureda
df is default field - you can only give one. To search over multiple
fields, you switch to eDisMax query parser and fl parameter.
Then, the question will be what type definition your fields have. When you
search text field, you are using its definition because of copyField. Your
original fields ma
Something to do with routing perhaps? (the mapping of ids to shards,
by default is based on hashes of the id)
-Yonik
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Chris Ulicny wrote:
> iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value.
>
> I tried reindexing a few documents back into the problematic cloud and
i still would like to see an experiment where you change the field to id
instead of iqdocid,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Something to do with routing perhaps? (the mapping of ids to shards,
> by default is based on hashes of the id)
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017
Oh, great! Thank you!
So if I switch over to eDisMax I'd specify the fields to query via the "qf"
parameter, right? That seems to have the same result (only matches when I
specify the exact phrase in the field, not just certain words from it).
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitc
Hi,
I have a question for which I wasn't able to find a good solution.
I have this structure of documents
A
|\
| \
B \
\
C
\
\
\
D
Document type A has fields id_number, date_from, date_to
Document type C has fields first_name, surname, birthdate
Docum
Hi Aman, are you using stopword in your analysis by any chance ?
Can you show us your request handler config ?
With the edismax you can configure stopwords to take effect at query parsing
stage.
Let's try to figure it out first.
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultan
My guess: Your analysis chain for the fields is different, i.e. they
have a different fieldType. In particular, watch out for the "string"
type, people are often confused about it. It does _not_ break input
into tokens, you need a text-based field type, text_en is one example
that is usually in the
You have nested entities and accumulate the content of the inner
entities in the outer one with caching on an inner one. Your
description sounds like the inner cache is not reset on the next
iteration of the outer loop.
This may be connected to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7843 (Fixe
Sanity check. Is your 'df' pointing at the field you think it is
pointing at? It really does look like all tokens were eaten and
nothing was left. But you should have seen that in the Analysis screen
too, if you have the right field.
Try adding echoParams=all to your request to see the full final
Thanks Alex. I will test it with 5.4 and 6.4 and let you know.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> You have nested entities and accumulate the content of the inner
> entities in the outer one with caching on an inner one. Your
> description sounds like the inner cache
Does real time get implementation reroutes the request internally to a
different shard? If not, then maybe the request is going to a
non-primary shard.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 March 2017 at 09:33, Yonik Seeley wrote
Speaking of routing, I realized I completely forgot to add the routing
setup to the test cloud, so it probably has something to do with the issue.
I'll add that in and report back.
So the routing and uniqueKey setup is as follows:
Schema setup:
iqdocid
I don't think it's mentioned in the docum
You're right! The fields I'm searching are all "string" type. I switched to
"text_en" and now it's working exactly as I need it to! I'll do some
research to see if "text_en" or another "text" type field is best for our
needs.
Also, those debug options are amazing! They'll help tremendously in the
Ah, yeah, if you're using a different route field it's highly likely
that's the issue.
I was always against that "feature", and this thread demonstrates part
of the problem (complicating clients, including us human clients
trying to make sense of what's going on).
-Yonik
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at
Yeah, they've saved me on numerous occasions, glad to see they helped.
One caution BTW when you start changing fieldTypes is you have to
watch punctuation. StandardTokenizerFactory won't pass through most
punctuation.
WordDelimiterFilterFactory breaks on non alpha-num, including
punctuation effec
Hi Mark,
Open Source Connection's excellent www.splainer.io might also be useful to
help you break down exactly what your query is doing.
Cheers
Charlie
P.S. planning a blog soon listing 'useful Solr tools'
On 16 March 2017 at 14:39, Mark Johnson
wrote:
> You're right! The fields I'm sea
I'm testing some function queries and have some questions.
original queries:
1. q=collection:ftmuenster&fl=*
--> numFound="6029"
2. q=collection:ftmuenster+AND+-description:*&fl=*
--> numFound="1877"
3. q=collection:ftmuenster+AND+description:*&fl=*
--> numFound="4152"
This looks good.
But now
I think I've figured out where the issue is, at least superficially. It's
in what parameter is used to define the field to route on. I set up two
collections to use the same configset but slightly altered calls to the
Collections API.
action=CREATE&name=CollectionOne&numShards=2&router.name=compos
Already check that i am sending sceenshots of various senarios
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:46 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Sanity check. Is your 'df' pointing at the field you think it is
> pointing at? It really does look like all tokens were eaten and
> nothing was left. But you should have
Images do not come through.
But I was wrong too. You use eDismax and pass "cust_shingle" in, so
the "df" value is irrelevant.
You definitely reloaded the core after changing definitions?
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 March 2017 at 12:37, A
Yes I have reloaded the core after config changes
On 16-Mar-2017 10:28 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
Images do not come through.
But I was wrong too. You use eDismax and pass "cust_shingle" in, so
the "df" value is irrelevant.
You definitely reloaded the core after changing definitions?
-
For images dropbox url is
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6dy6a8ajabjtxrt/AAAoxhZQe2vp3sTl3Av71_eHa?dl=0
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:29 PM Aman Deep Singh
wrote:
> Yes I have reloaded the core after config changes
>
>
> On 16-Mar-2017 10:28 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch"
> wrote:
>
> Images do not come
Wow, that's really powerful! Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Charlie Hull wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Open Source Connection's excellent www.splainer.io might also be useful to
> help you break down exactly what your query is doing.
>
> Cheers
>
> Charlie
>
> P.S. planning a blog soon lis
Thank you for the heads up! I think in some cases we will want to strip out
punctuation but in others we might need it (for example, "liquid courage."
should tokenize to "liquid" and "courage", while "1.5 oz liquid courage"
should tokenize to "1.5", "oz", "liquid" and "courage").
I'll have to do s
Hi All,
I am trying to figure out why Solr returns an empty result when searching
for the following query:
nameExact:"Guardian EU-referendum"
The field definition:
The type definition:
The analysis, as expected, matches the query parameter against the stored
value. Please take
Still broken with zk 3.4.6. Even the “solr zk” commands can’t fetch the file.
It is there. I can list it.
$ bin/solr zk ls /configs/tutors
Connecting to ZooKeeper at
zookeeper01.prod2.cloud.cheggnet.com:2181,zookeeper02.prod2.cloud.cheggnet.com:2181,zookeeper03.prod2.cloud.cheggnet.com,zookeepe
You can try to check debugQuery to understand how this query is parsed:
double quotes hardly compatible with KeywordTokenizer. Also you can check
which terms are indexed in SchemaBrowser. Also, there is Analysis page at
Solr Admin.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Gintautas Sulskus <
gintautas.sul
Hello,
A function query matches all docs. Use {!frange} if you want to select docs
with some particular values.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> I'm testing some function queries and have some questions.
>
> original queries:
> 1. q=collect
Hello,
It's hard to get into the problem. but you probably want to have dismax on
child level:
q={!parent ...}{!edismax qf='childF1 childF2' v=$chq}&chq=foo bar
It's usually broken because child query might match parents which is not
allowed. Thus, it's probably can solved by adding +type:child in
Well, only router.field is the valid parameter as per
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-CREATE:CreateaCollection
In the second case the parameter is ignored and the uniqueKey is used
instead, which is different for you.
But it is the first case that f
Oh. Try your query with quotes around the phone phrase:
q="one plus one"
My hypothesis is:
Query parser splits things on whitespace before passing it down into
analyzer chain as individual match attempts. The Analysis UI does not
take that into account and treats the whole string as phrase sent. Y
Hello,
I've tested on an old solr 4.3 instance and the schema and the field
definition are fine. I've also checked that only the
query nameExact:"Guardian EU-referendum" gives the result, the other one
you have commented (nameExact:"Guardian US") gives 0 hits. Maybe, you
forgot to re-index after s
Hello Mikhail,
thanks for fast answer. The problem is, that I want to have the dismax
on child and parent together - to have the filter evaluated together.
I need to have documents:
path: car
type:car
color:red
first_country: CZ
name:seat
path: car\engine
type:engine
power:63KW
pat
Hello Jan,
What if you combine child and parent dismaxes like below
q={!edismax qf=$parentfields}foo bar {!parent ..}{!dismax qf=$childfields
v=$childclauses}&childclauses=foo bar +type:child&parentfields=...&
parentfields=...
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Jan Nekuda wrote:
> Hello Mikhail,
There isn't a jira issue for this yet. FOr Solr 6.6 there are few important
features lined up:
1) SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT)
2) Date/Time function support
3) Arithmetic function support
4) SELECT ... INTO ...
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Damien Kamer
On 3/15/2017 6:45 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> I have a pretty good guess what happened. I requested a Zookeeper
> 3.4.6 cluster, but they built a 3.4.9 cluster.
This is the first I've heard of problems with ZK 3.4.9 on the server
side. That would be the server version that I would recommend fo
If I give query in quotes it converted query in to graph query as
Graph(cust_sh6:"one plus one" hasBoolean=false hasPhrase=false)
On 17-Mar-2017 1:38 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
> Oh. Try your query with quotes around the phone phrase:
> q="one plus one"
>
> My hypothesis is:
> Query pa
I ended up doing something like this:
String core = "collection1_shard1_core1";
ModifiableSolrParams p = new ModifiableSolrParams();
p.set("show", "index");
GenericSolrRequest checkRequest = new GenericSolrRequest(POST, "/../" +
core + "/admin/luke", p);
NamedList checkResult = client.request("col
Which is what I believe you had as a working example in your Dropbox images.
So, does it work now?
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 March 2017 at 22:22, Aman Deep Singh wrote:
> If I give query in quotes it converted query
No it doesn't work
On 17-Mar-2017 8:38 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
> Which is what I believe you had as a working example in your Dropbox
> images.
>
> So, does it work now?
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
>
>
> O
On 3/16/2017 1:40 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Oh. Try your query with quotes around the phone phrase:
> q="one plus one"
That query with the fieldType the user supplied produces this, on 6.3.0
with the lucene parser:
"querystring":"test:\"one plus one\"",
"parsedquery":"MultiPhraseQuery(te
I also tried in 5.2.1
for the query
http://localhost:8984/solr/test/select?q=TITLE_SH:one\%20plus\%20one&wt=xml&debugQuery=true
0
1
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
xml
true
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
TITLE_SH:one\ plus\ one
*((TITLE_SH:one plus TITLE_SH:one plus one)/no_coord) TITLE_SH:plus one*
(T
Can someone please respond?
From: Srinivasan Narayanan
Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Subject: Alphanumeric sort with alphabets first
Hello SOLR experts,
I am new to SOLR and I am trying to do alphanumeric sort on string field(s).
However, in my cas
57 matches
Mail list logo
