Does real time get implementation reroutes the request internally to a different shard? If not, then maybe the request is going to a non-primary shard.
Regards, Alex. ---- http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced On 16 March 2017 at 09:33, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something to do with routing perhaps? (the mapping of ids to shards, > by default is based on hashes of the id) > -Yonik > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >> iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value. >> >> I tried reindexing a few documents back into the problematic cloud and am >> getting the same behavior of no document found for get handler. >> >> I've also done some testing on standalone instances as well as some quick >> cloud setups (with embedded zk), and I cannot seem to replicate the >> problem. For each test, I used the exact same configset that is causing the >> issue for us and indexed a document from that instance as well. I can >> provide more details if that would be useful in anyway. >> >> Standalone instance worked >> Cloud mode worked regardless of the use of the security plugin >> Cloud mode worked regardless of explicit get handler definition >> Cloud mode consistently worked with explicitly defining the get handler, >> then removing it and reloading the collection >> >> The only differences that I know of between the tests and the problematic >> cloud is that solr is running as a different user and using an external >> zookeeper ensemble. The running user has ownership of the solr >> installation, log, and data directories. >> >> I'm going to keep trying different setups to see if I can replicate the >> issue, but if anyone has any ideas on what direction might make the most >> sense, please let me know. >> >> Thanks again >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:49 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Wait... Is iqdocid set to the <uniqueKey> in your schema? That might >> be the missing thing. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >>> Unless the behavior's changed on the way to version 6.3.0, the get handler >>> used to use whatever field is set to be the uniqueKey. We have >> successfully >>> been using get on a 4.9.0 standalone core with no explicit "id" field >>> defined by passing in the value for the uniqueKey field to the get >> handler. >>> We tend to have a bunch of id fields floating around from different >>> sources, so we avoid keeping any of them named as "id" >>> >>> iqdocid is just a basic string type >>> <field name="iqdocid" type="string" multiValued="false" indexed="true" >>> required="true" stored="true"/> >>> >>> I'll do some more testing on standalone versions, and see how that goes. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM David Hastings < >> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> from your previous email: >>>> "There is no "id" >>>> field defined in the schema." >>>> >>>> you need an id field to use the get handler >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >>>> >>>> > I thought that "id" and "ids" were fixed parameters for the get >> handler, >>>> > but I never remember, so I've already tried both. Each time it comes >> back >>>> > with the same response of no document. >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:31 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch < >>>> arafa...@gmail.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Actually..... >>>> > > >>>> > > I think Real Time Get handler has "id" as a magical parameter, not as >>>> > > a field name. It maps to the real id field via the uniqueKey >>>> > > definition: >>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/RealTime+Get >>>> > > >>>> > > So, if you have not, could you try the way you originally wrote it. >>>> > > >>>> > > Regards, >>>> > > Alex. >>>> > > ---- >>>> > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >>>> > experienced >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On 15 March 2017 at 13:22, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >>>> > > > Sorry, that is a typo. The get is using the iqdocid field. There is >>>> no >>>> > > "id" >>>> > > > field defined in the schema. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > solr/TestCollection/get?iqdocid=2957-TV-201604141900 >>>> > > > >>>> > > > solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 >>>> > > > >>>> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM Erick Erickson < >>>> > erickerick...@gmail.com> >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> > > >> Is this a typo or are you trying to use get with an "id" field and >>>> > > >> your filter query uses "iqdocid"? >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> Best, >>>> > > >> Erick >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > >> > Yes, we're using a fixed schema with the iqdocid field set as >> the >>>> > > >> uniqueKey. >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:28 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch < >>>> > > >> arafa...@gmail.com> >>>> > > >> > wrote: >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> >> What is your uniqueKey? Is it iqdocid? >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> Regards, >>>> > > >> >> Alex. >>>> > > >> >> ---- >>>> > > >> >> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >>>> > > >> experienced >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 11:24, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >> >> > Hi, >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > I've been trying to use the get handler for a new solr cloud >>>> > > >> collection >>>> > > >> >> we >>>> > > >> >> > are using, and something seems to be amiss. >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > We are running 6.3.0, so we did not explicitly define the >>>> request >>>> > > >> handler >>>> > > >> >> > in the solrconfig since it's supposed to be implicitly >> defined. >>>> > We >>>> > > >> also >>>> > > >> >> > have the update log enabled with the default configuration. >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > Whenever I send a get query for a document already known to >> be >>>> in >>>> > > the >>>> > > >> >> > collection, I get no documents returned. But when I use a >>>> filter >>>> > > >> query on >>>> > > >> >> > the uniqueKey field for the same value I get the document >> back >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > solr/TestCollection/get?id=2957-TV-201604141900 >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > Is there some configuration that I am missing? >>>> > > >> >> > >>>> > > >> >> > Thanks, >>>> > > >> >> > Chris >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >>>> > >>>>
