Re: Spell check with data from database and not from english dictionary

Just asking here. What are community's experiences regarding using spellcheck with external file against Synonym filter for exact matches? On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 17:28, seeteshh wrote: > Hello Jan > > Let me work on your suggestions too. > > Also I had one query > > While working on the spell c

Re: Spell check with data from database and not from english dictionary

Hello Jan Let me work on your suggestions too. Also I had one query While working on the spell check component, I dont any suggestion for the incorrect word typed example : In spellcheck.q, I type "Teh" instead of "The" or "saa" instead of "sea" "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTim

Re: Spell check with data from database and not from english dictionary

You could create a job in your application that generates a new spellcheck dictionary from DB every day and upload it to Zookeeper, then calling RELOAD on the collection(s). Or you could start investigating a ManagedSpellchecker implementation of the spellcheck component that exposes a REST API

Re: Spell check with data from database and not from english dictionary

Hello Alessandra Thanks for your post. Thats what I am concerned about generating a file or reindexing as the data in the database will keep on changing (adding or updating). Can you share any links where it is configurable on Solr 8.4? Regards, Seetesh Hindlekar - Seetesh Hindlekar --

Re: Spell check with data from database and not from english dictionary

Hi Seetesh, As you can see from the wiki [1] there are mainly two input sources for a spellcheck dictionary: 1) a file 2) the index (in a couple of different forms) If you prefer the file approach, it's your call to produce the file and you can certainly use whatever you like to fill the data. It

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Let me know if I should open a JIRA issue for this. Thanks. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Arnold Bronley wrote: > I tried spellcheck.q=polt and q=tag:polt. I get collations, but they are > only for polt and not tag:polt. Because of that, the hits that I get back > are for frequency of plot a

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

I tried spellcheck.q=polt and q=tag:polt. I get collations, but they are only for polt and not tag:polt. Because of that, the hits that I get back are for frequency of plot and not frequency of tag:plot { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 20, "params": { "spellcheck.col

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

But you used : "spellcheck.q": "tag:polt", Instead of : "spellcheck.q": "polt", Regards - --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

With q instead of spellcheck.q I get following response: { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 23, "params": { "q": "tag:polt", "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults": "true", "indent": "true", "spellcheck": "true", "spellcheck.accuracy": "0.72",

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

with spellcheck.q I don't get anything back at all. { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 10, "params": { "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults": "true", "spellcheck.q": "tag:polt", "indent": "true", "spellcheck": "true", "spellcheck.accuracy": "0.72"

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Interesting, what happens when you pass it as spellcheck.q=polt ? What is the behavior you get ? - --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Thanks for replying. I tried spellcheck.q=polt and it does not help. Here is how the query looks like: http://solr:8983/solr/myapp/select?q=tag:polt&wt=json&indent=true&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.count=7&spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true&spellcheck.extendedResults=true&spellcheck.collate=true&spell

Re: spell-check does not return collations when using search query with filter

Does spellcheck.q=polt help ? How your queries normally look ? How would you like the collation to be returned ? - --- Alessandro Benedetti Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472

Re: Spell check suggestions because of case

Hello Thanks for your reply. When I search for Diabetes I get the results back and also suggestion for diabetes - which is just a lower case version of Diabetes. This is true for any search words. When I type in Health - I get results back and also suggestion for health. I have applied the necess

Re: Spell check suggestions because of case

Hi Kalpana, can you explain better ? In your index you have "diabetes" . Which suggestion you would prefer to see ? Seems not ab-normal to me. Cheers On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Kalpana wrote: > Hello > > I am getting suggestions for Diabetes as diabetes - even though it brings > the same

Re: Spell Check and Privacy

We had the very exact issue and we solved as James suggested :) To answer Susheel, the requirement is to provide users with the only suggestions he should see. It can seem a paranoid request but can happen that we don't want to show any of the indexed data for different users. In enterprise search

Re: Spell Check and Privacy

Hi Arnon, I couldn't fully understood your use case regarding Privacy. Are you concerned that SpellCheck may reveal user names part of suggestions which could have belonged to different organizations / ACLS OR after providing suggestions you are concerned that user may be able to click and view ot

RE: Spell Check and Privacy

Arnon, Use "spellcheck.collate=true" with "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" set to a non-zero value. This will give you re-written queries that are guaranteed to return hits, given the original query and filters. If you are using an "mm" value other than 100%, you also will want specify "spellc

Re: Spell Check for Multiple Words

You need to have collations=true and have large and number in your dictionary. Then the collation should return what you desire. -Bob > On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:27 PM, David Philip > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to obtain multi-word spellcheck suggestions. For eg., I have > a title field w

RE: Spell check collation

DirectSolrSpellChecker defaults with a minimum term length of 4. So you'd need to bring this down with 1. But you might not like the results from this. See: http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_6_0/suggest/org/apache/lucene/search/spell/DirectSpellChecker.html#setMinQueryLength%28int%29 James Dy

RE: Spell check [or] Did you mean this with Phrase suggestion

Here is my configuration : schema.xml: solrconfig.xml: text_en default name_gen solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker internal 0.5

RE: Spell check [or] Did you mean this with Phrase suggestion

No collate is working as expected, Please help. It is more like spell checking with Infix suggester. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-check-or-Did-you-mean-this-with-Phrase-suggestion-tp4135547p4139260.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive

RE: Spell check [or] Did you mean this with Phrase suggestion

Have you looked at "spellcheck.collate", which re-writes the entire query with one or more corrected words? See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate . There are several options shown at this link that controls how the "collate" feature works. James Dyer Ingram C

Re: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers

Query converter is a plugin if the app has special requirements. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Dyer, James Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:33 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers That makes sense because the Query

RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers

: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers Hi James, Thanks for you reply. I got it worked and below was my old query.   http://localhost:8080/solr_3.6.1_spellcheck/test_spellcheck/spellcheck?q=8956632541&spellcheck=true now I changed the

Re: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers

5415 Regards, Poornima From: "Dyer, James" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, 25 July 2013 9:03 PM Subject: RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers I think the default SpellingQueryConverter has a hard time with ter

RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers

I think the default SpellingQueryConverter has a hard time with terms that contain numbers. Can you provide a failing case...the query you're executing (with all the spellcheck.xxx params) and the spellcheck response (or lack thereof). Is it producing any hits? James Dyer Ingram Content Group

Re: Spell check in SOLR

See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Prathik Puthran wrote: > Hi, > > How can i configure SOLR to provide corrections for misspelled words. If > the query string is in dictionary SOLR should not return any suggestions. > But if the query string is no

RE: Spell check component does not return any suggestions

solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Spell check component does not return any suggestions I tried to add spellcheck.alternativeTermCount=5 but still no suggestion has been found. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-check-component-does-not-return-any

Re: Spell check component does not return any suggestions

I tried to add spellcheck.alternativeTermCount=5 but still no suggestion has been found. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-check-component-does-not-return-any-suggestions-tp4053757p4053772.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spell check component does not return any suggestions

Hi, I think you need to use the alternativeTermCount parameter ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.alternativeTermCount) to return suggestions for terms which occur less often than the user-entered term. More discussion here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585

RE: Spell Check is not working properly

The spellcheckers (IndexBasedSpellChecker and DirectSolrSpellChecker) both have tuning parameters that control how similar a potential correction needs to be from the original query term in order to be considered. For IndexBasedSpellChecker, there is "spellcheck.accuracy", which should be a nu

Re: Spell Check

Hey thanks. It worked. I have another query. Since I have made a dictionary on Keyword tokenization (as I need a dictionary of names), when I try to spellcheck, it works great on most cases. But in cases where say the correct word is :"Shivthar Ghal" and I try to search for a spelling correction

RE: Spell Check

The most likely problem is forgetting to specify "spellcheck.build=true" on the first query since the last restart. This builds the spell check dictionary used by the IndexBasedSpellChecker. You should put this in a warming query or alternatively, specify build-on-commit or build-on-optimize.

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

i implemented spellcheck recently My solrconfig.xml and schema.xml are attached... i used nutch for crawling and solr for indexing & searching. just look at the "textSpell" & "spell" wherever they are used in both the files. These are actually managing the Spellcheck .

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

On Nov 21, 2010, at 7:14 AM, rajini maski wrote: > If any one know articles or blog on solr spell-check component configuration > type..please let me know..solr-wiki not helping me solve maze.. Might be helpful: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/08/31/getting-started-spell-checking-with

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

SOLR wiki page is the best place to find that. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3004823/solr-spellcheck-configuration http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spel

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

If any one know articles or blog on solr spell-check component configuration type..please let me know..solr-wiki not helping me solve maze.. On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:40 PM, rajini maski wrote: > And If I am trying to do : > > http://localhost:8909/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curst&version=2.2&sta

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

Did you configure below one in your default request handler? spellcheck -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-Check-Component-Functionality-tp1923954p1929124.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

And If I am trying to do : http://localhost:8909/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curst&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&spellcheck=true &q=Curst& The XML OUTPUT IS - -

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

Hello Peter, Thanks For reply :)I did spellcheck.q=Curst as you said ...Query is like: http://localhost:8909/solr/select/?spellcheck.q=Curst&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&spellcheck=true I am getting this error :( HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at java.io

Re: Spell-Check Component Functionality

Hi Rajani, some notes: * try spellcheck.q=curst or completely without spellcheck.q but with q * compared to the normal q parameter spellcheck.q can have a different analyzer/tokenizer and is used if present * do not do spellcheck.build=true for every request (creating the spellcheck index c

Re: spell check vs terms component

Shalin / Ken, Thanks a lot for your suggestions ..I havent tried NGrams filter.. I will try that too.. Thanks, Barani -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spell-check-vs-terms-component-tp1870214p1877233.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nab

Re: spell check vs terms component

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:20 AM, bbarani wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> We are trying to implement auto suggest feature in our application. >> >> I would like to know the difference between terms vs spell check component. >> >> Both the hand

Re: spell check vs terms component

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:20 AM, bbarani wrote: > > Hi, > > We are trying to implement auto suggest feature in our application. > > I would like to know the difference between terms vs spell check component. > > Both the handlers seems to display almost the same output, can anyone let > me > know

Re: Spell check suggesting corrections for boost function

: I'm trying to perform spell checking as part of a query using the Lucene : parser, and I'm finding that the spell checker is giving me suggestions for : the mathematical functions used in my boost clause. Here's my request as : seen through solr admin: spellchecker looks at the literal "q" par

Re: Spell check returns strange suggestion

Adding on top of this there are business requirement we need to meet. Let me add we are having a huge content with make, model and their description. Right now we are copying make,model and description to our spelll check field. So our spellcheck fields have words like honda, civic etc.. We are

Re: Spell check returns strange suggestion

Thanks for the prompt reply i added the parameter 0.7 to my config and this seems to take care of it. Works which are present very close to the misspelled words seems to come back now. darniz Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. wrote: > > darniz said: >> >> Hello All >> Please reply to this ASAP >>

Re: Spell check returns strange suggestion

darniz said: > > Hello All > Please reply to this ASAP > I am using indexbasedSpellchecker right now i copy only model, and make > names and some other fields to my spellcheck field. > Hence my spell check field consists of only 120 words. > > The issue is if i type hond i get back honda which is f

Re: Spell check suggestion and correct way of implementation and some Questions

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:31 AM, darniz wrote: > > Thanks > > i included the buildOncommit and buildOnOptimize as true and indexed some > documents and it automatically builds the dictionary. > > Are there any performance issues we should be aware of, with this approach. > > Well, it depends. Ea

Re: Spell check suggestion and correct way of implementation and some Questions

Thanks i included the buildOncommit and buildOnOptimize as true and indexed some documents and it automatically builds the dictionary. Are there any performance issues we should be aware of, with this approach. Rashid -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Spell-check-suggest

Re: Spell check suggestion and correct way of implementation and some Questions

Hello everybody i am able to use spell checker but i have some questions if someone can answer this if i search free text word waranty then i get back suggestion warranty which is fine. but if do a search on field for example description:waranty the output collation element is description:warranty

Re: Spell check suggestion and correct way of implementation and some Questions

Hello everybody i am able to use spell checker but i have some questions if someone can answer this if i search free text word waranty then i get back suggestion warranty which is fine. but if do a search on field for example description:waranty the output collation element is description:warranty

Re: Spell check suggestion and correct way of implementation and some Questions

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:57 PM, darniz wrote: > > Question. Should i build the dictionlary only once and after that as new > words are indexed the dictionary will be updated. Or i to do that manually > over certain interval. > > No. The dictionary is built only when spellcheck.build=true is spec

Re: Spell Check Handler

Anuvenk, I see you are asking the same question multiple times and you have quoted one of my older postings on the SpellingCheckerRequestHandler that I submitted a while ago. Sorry to inform you that those postings no longer apply, since the work I done was superseded with another release and

Re: Spell Check Handler

I followed your instructions exactly. But still have trouble with multiword queries for eg: q=grapics returns 'graphics' but q=grapics card returns nothing. I even tried with the latest nightly build but didn't solve the problem. Any solution available. scott.tabar wrote: > > Matthew, > > Thank

Re: spell check component

I just asked this too: http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg08515.html On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:45 PM, anuvenk wrote: Is it possible to add a spell check component so i don't have to issue a separate request to solr to do the spell checking? Sorry if this question is n

Re: spell check component

There is not yet a spell checking component... It would be great to have though! anuvenk wrote: Is it possible to add a spell check component so i don't have to issue a separate request to solr to do the spell checking? Sorry if this question is naive..am just learning to use solr. class="or

Re: Spell Check Handler

Matthew, Thanks for the question. The answer is that they come from your own indexes so the dictionary is based upon the actual words that are already stored in Solr. This makes sense; if the spell checker is suggesting a word that is not in the Solr index, then it will not help the user find

Re: Spell Check Handler

Where does the index come from in the first place? Do we have to enter the words, or are they entered as documents enter the SOLR index? I'd love to be able to use my own documents as the spell check index of "correctly spelled words". +--

Re: Spell Check Handler

Climbingrose, I think you make a valid point. Each person may have a different concept of how something should work with their application. My thought on the subject of spell checking multiple words: - the parameter "multiWords" enables spell checking on each word in "q" parameter instead of

Re: Spell Check Handler

Just to clarify this line of code: String[] suggestions = spellChecker.suggestSimilar(termText, numSug, req.getSearcher().getReader(), restrictToField, true); I only return suggestions if they are more popular than termText. You probably need to use code in Scott's patch to make this behaviour co

Re: Spell Check Handler

Hi all, I've been so busy the last few days so I haven't replied to this email. I modified SpellCheckerHandler a while ago to include support for multiword query. To be honest, I didn't have time to write unit test for the code. However, I deployed it in a production environment and it has been wo

Re: Spell Check Handler

Hoss, I had a feeling someone would be quoting Yonik's Law of Patches! ;-) For now, this is done. I created the changes, created JavaDoc comments on the various settings and their expected output, created a JUnit test for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler which tests various components of the ha

Re: Spell Check Handler

I started to look at this back in August and decided to wait for climbingrose's implementation, however since then my priorities changed and I hadn't had a chance to re-visit it. Sounds like there is quite a bit of interest in this feature, so it would be great if those who have make progress on t

RE: Spell Check Handler

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 8:27 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Otis Gospodnetic Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler Greetings, I too have a strong need to handle multiple words. Also I have run in to a limitation within the

Re: Spell Check Handler

: If you like, I can post the source code changes that I made to the : SpellCheckerRequestHandler, but at this time I am not ready to open a : JIRA issue and submit the changes back through the subversion. I will : need to do a little more testing, documentation, and create some unit : tests

Re: Spell Check Handler

e you can provide a patch? Thanks! Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 8:24:12 AM Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler I'm happy t

Re: Spell Check Handler

Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 8:24:12 AM Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler I'm happy to contrib

Re: Spell Check Handler

Thanks Karl. I'll check it out! On 8/18/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without > LUCENE-550, but smoother with. > > Perhaps it is something you can use. > > > 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose: > > > I'm happy to cont

Re: Spell Check Handler

I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without LUCENE-550, but smoother with. Perhaps it is something you can use. 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose: I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler. I'll post the code once I strip off stuff relate

Re: Spell Check Handler

I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler. I'll post the code once I strip off stuff related to our product. On 8/12/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/08/07, > climbingrose< > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Spell Check Handler

12 aug 2007 kl. 02.35 skrev climbingrose: I think you mean LUCENE-626 Yeah. Is it possible to use it in product environment? It's been running live for a long time at this one place, but the code is stuck at Lucene 2.0 and an old version of 550. I don't really do any more Solr than to m

Re: Spell Check Handler

On 11/08/07, climbingrose< [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's exactly what I did with my custom version of the > SpellCheckerHandler. > However, I didn't handle suggestionCount and only returned the one > corrected > phrase which contains the "bes

Re: Spell Check Handler

Yeah. How stable is the patch Karl? Is it possible to use it in product environment? On 8/12/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 11 aug 2007 kl. 10.36 skrev climbingrose: > > > There is an issue on > > Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker: > > https://issues.apache.o

Re: Spell Check Handler

11 aug 2007 kl. 10.36 skrev climbingrose: There is an issue on Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550 I think you mean LUCENE-626 that sort of depends on LUCENE-550. -- karl

Re: Spell Check Handler

That's exactly what I did with my custom version of the SpellCheckerHandler. However, I didn't handle suggestionCount and only returned the one corrected phrase which contains the "best" corrected terms. There is an issue on Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker: https://issues.apa

Re: Spell Check Handler

On 11/08/07, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The spellchecker handler doesn't seem to work with multi-word query. For > example, when I tried to spellcheck "Java developar", it returns nothing > while if I tried "developar", spellchecker correctly returns "developer". > I > followed the

Re: Spell Check Handler

will > > > look a bit > > > > > > weird / mangled. Take a look at the wiki page for more info: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, &g

Re: Spell Check Handler

in 1.2 release or I have to build > > the > > > > > > trunk. > > > > > > I tried your instructions but Solr returns nothing: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: Spell Check Handler

t; > > > > > 0 > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > > > > rebuild > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Spell Check Handler

mmed and analyzed the words. I found that using the > > > StandardTokenizer > > > > and StandardFilter and removing the PorterStemmer and > LowerCaseFilter > > > from > > > > the field schema really improved the spell checker performance. > > >

Re: Spell Check Handler

checker performance. > > > > > > I haven't included this info on the wiki page yet, I'll try to update > it > > > soon when I have a bit more time. > > > > > > cheers, > > > Tristan > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Spell Check Handler

on the wiki page yet, I'll try to update it > > soon when I have a bit more time. > > > > cheers, > > Tristan > > > > > > > > On 7/8/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Tristan - good summary - want to copy that to the Solr Wiki? > > > > > > Tha

Re: Spell Check Handler

> On 7/8/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Tristan - good summary - want to copy that to the Solr Wiki? > > > > Thanks, > > Otis > > > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share > > > > - Origi

Re: Spell Check Handler

TED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2007 1:51:15 AM > Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler > > I couldn't find any documention on the spell check handler either but > found > enough information from the solrconfig.xml file, simply search for >

Re: Spell Check Handler

to the Solr Wiki? Thanks, Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: Tristan Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2007 1:51:15 A

Re: Spell Check Handler

r-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2007 1:51:15 AM Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler I couldn't find any documention on the spell check handler either but found enough information from the solrconfig.xml file, simply search for "SpellCheckerRequestHandler" (online version here): http:/

Re: Spell Check Handler

I couldn't find any documention on the spell check handler either but found enough information from the solrconfig.xml file, simply search for "SpellCheckerRequestHandler" (online version here): http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml You can view the or