Thanks Karl. I'll check it out! On 8/18/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without > LUCENE-550, but smoother with. > > Perhaps it is something you can use. > > > 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose: > > > I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler. > > I'll post > > the code once I strip off stuff related to our product. > > > > On 8/12/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-626>On 11/08/07, > >> climbingrose< > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> That's exactly what I did with my custom version of the > >>> SpellCheckerHandler. > >>> However, I didn't handle suggestionCount and only returned the one > >>> corrected > >>> phrase which contains the "best" corrected terms. There is an > >>> issue on > >>> Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker: > >>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550? > >> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > >>> > >> > >> > >> I'd be interested to take a look at your modifications to the > >> SpellCheckerHandler, how did you handle phrase queries? maybe we > >> can open > >> a > >> JIRA issue to expand the spell checking functionality to perform > >> analysis > >> on > >> multi-word input values. > >> > >> I did find http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-626 after > >> looking > >> at > >> LUCENE-550, but since these patches are not yet included in the > >> Lucene > >> trunk > >> yet it might be a little difficult to justify implementing them in > >> Solr. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Cuong Hoang > >
-- Regards, Cuong Hoang
