Hello,

Did I miss this contribution or did it not happen?  I'm referring to the change 
to the SpellCheckerRequestHandler to handle spelling corrections/suggestions 
for multi-word queries.

Any chance you can provide a patch?

Thanks!

Otis
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/  -  Tag  -  Search  -  Share

----- Original Message ----
From: climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 8:24:12 AM
Subject: Re: Spell Check Handler

I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler. I'll post
the code once I strip off stuff related to our product.

On 8/12/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-626>On 11/08/07,
> climbingrose<
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's exactly what I did with my custom version of the
> > SpellCheckerHandler.
> > However, I didn't handle suggestionCount and only returned the one
> > corrected
> > phrase which contains the "best" corrected terms. There is an issue on
> > Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> >
>
>
> I'd be interested to take a look at your modifications to the
> SpellCheckerHandler, how did you handle phrase queries? maybe we can open
> a
> JIRA issue to expand the spell checking functionality to perform analysis
> on
> multi-word input values.
>
> I did find http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-626 after looking
> at
> LUCENE-550, but since these patches are not yet included in the Lucene
> trunk
> yet it might be a little difficult to justify implementing them in Solr.
>



-- 
Regards,

Cuong Hoang



Reply via email to