Ok, thanks for your response, Mark!
Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I think it's just cruft I left in and never ended up using anywhere. You
> can ignore it.
>
> - Mark
>
> > On Oct 13, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Martin Grotzke <
&g
Hi,
can anybody tell me the meaning of ZkStateReader.SYNC? All other state
related constants are clear to me, I'm only not sure about the semantics
of SYNC.
Background: I'm working on an async solr client
(https://github.com/inoio/solrs) and want to add SolrCloud support - for
this I'm reusing Zk
Hi,
I just submitted an issue with patch for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3318
Cheers,
Martin
On 04/04/2012 03:53 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we want to use the LBHttpSolrServer (4.0/trunk) and specify a preferred
> server. Our use case is that for one
Hi,
we want to use the LBHttpSolrServer (4.0/trunk) and specify a preferred
server. Our use case is that for one user request we make several solr
requests with some heavy caching (using a custom request handler with a
special cache) and want to make sure that the subsequent solr requests
are hitt
Hi,
is it possible to determine the memory consumption (heap space) per core
in solr trunk (4.0-SNAPSHOT)?
I just unloaded a core and saw the difference in memory usage, but it
would be nice to have a smoother way of getting the information without
core downtime.
It would also be interesting, wh
uot; but there ist none in the
>> /solr/data-Folder.
>>
>> Question: is it possible, that those exceptions are responsible for the
>> OutOfMemory-Problem or could it be due to the large(?) number of 40k terms
>> for which we want to sort the result via external file field?
>>
>> I'm looking forward for your answers, suggestions and ideas :)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Sven
>>
>>
>> [1]:
>> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.html
>>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ttpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:397)
at
org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient.executeMethod(HttpClient.java:323)
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:427)
--
Martin Grotzke
http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
memory-for-solr-caches-tp2328257p2330652.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2011 11:54:55 Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > recently we're experiencing OOMEs (GC overhead limit exceeded) in our
> > searches. Therefore I want to get some clarification on
Hi,
as the biggest parts of our jvm heap are used by solr caches I asked myself
if it wouldn't make sense to run solr caches backed by terracotta's
bigmemory (http://www.terracotta.org/bigmemory).
The goal is to reduce the time needed for full / stop-the-world GC cycles,
as with our 8GB heap the l
Hi,
recently we're experiencing OOMEs (GC overhead limit exceeded) in our
searches. Therefore I want to get some clarification on heap and cache
configuration.
This is the situation:
- Solr 1.4.1 running on tomcat 6, Sun JVM 1.6.0_13 64bit
- JVM Heap Params: -Xmx8G -XX:MaxPermSize=256m -XX:NewSiz
ed when something
> else makes it obsolete.
>
> Here's a place to start: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Martin Grotzke <
> martin.grot...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-866>this is an open issue
Thanx for the pointer! SOLR-866 is even better suited for us - after
reading SOLR-433 again I realized that it targets scripts based
replication (what we're going to leave behind us).
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Best
>
eives that little
interest. Anything wrong with it?
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Martin Grotzke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the spellchecker component already provides a buildOnCommit and
> buildOnOptimize option.
>
> Since we have several spellchecker indices buil
the lifecycle, is there already some executor "framework" or
>> any regularly running process in place, or would I have to pull up my
>> own thread? If so, how can I stop my thread when solr/tomcat is
>> shutdown (I couldn't see any shutdown or destroy method in
>> SearchComponent)?
>>
>> Thanx for your feedback,
>> cheers,
>> Martin
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke
Hi,
the spellchecker component already provides a buildOnCommit and
buildOnOptimize option.
Since we have several spellchecker indices building on each commit is
not really what we want to do.
Building on optimize is not possible as index optimization is done on
the master and the slaves don't ev
should I pull up my own
Timer/TimerTask etc. and create it from scratch?
Cheers,
Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
Hi,
that there's no feedback indicates that our plans/preferences are
fine. Otherwise it's now a good opportunity to feed back :-)
Cheers,
Martin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Martin Grotzke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're just planning to move from our replicated s
Hi,
we're just planning to move from our replicated single index setup to
a replicated setup with multiple cores.
We're going to start with 2 cores, but the number of cores may
change/increase over time.
Our replication is still based on scripts/rsync, and I'm wondering if
it's worth moving to ja
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Martin Grotzke
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Martin Grotzke
>> wrote:
>>> Still I'm wondering, why this issue does not occur with the plain
>>> ex
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Martin Grotzke
> wrote:
>> Still I'm wondering, why this issue does not occur with the plain
>> example solr setup with 2 indexed docs. Any explanation?
>
> It's an old opti
Is there s.th. like a timeframe when there's an
agreement on the correct solution and a patch available?
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Martin Grotzke
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after an upgrade from solr-1.3 to
e solr side?
Of course - for a quick fix - I'll change our app so that there's no
sort param specified when rows=0.
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Grotzke
http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke
quot; and "Hosen" give the
same results)
- inconsistent/strange sorting of suggestions (as described in
http://www.nabble.com/spellcheck%3A-issues-td19845539.html).
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:45 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:00 -0400,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:00 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:51 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > what about multi-word searches like "harry potter"? When I do a search
> > in our index for "harry poter"
, I can help you get the spellchecker
> up-and-running. Additional replies in-lined below.
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > Now I'm thinking about the source-field in the spellchecker ("spell"):
>
Hi,
I'm just starting with the spellchecker component provided by solr - it
is really cool!
Now I'm thinking about the source-field in the spellchecker ("spell"):
how should fields be analyzed during indexing, and how should the
queryAnalyzerFieldType be configured.
If I have brands like e.g. "A
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:31 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > > On 10/25/07, Max Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is it possi
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Max Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible that the prefix-processing ignores the filters?
>
> Yes, It's a known limitation that we haven't worked out a fix for yet.
> The issue is that you can't just run the p
Hello,
I'm just thinking about a solution for a type ahead functionality
that shall suggest terms that the user can search for, and that
displays how many docs are "behind" that search (like google suggest).
When I use facet.prefix and facet.field=text, where text is my catchall
field (and defaul
at query time, but the docs in the
wiki recommend to expand synonyms at index time...
What are your experiences? Would you also suggest to use them when
indexing?
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:32 +0200, Thomas Traeger wrote:
> Martin Grotzke schrieb:
> >> Try the SnowballPorterFilterFactory
Hi Daniel,
thanx for your suggestions, being able to export a large synonyms.txt
sounds very well!
Thx && cheers,
Martin
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 23:38 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 12:00, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > Basically I see two options: st
I wouldn't expect a user to search for "keine
hose" or s.th. like this :)
Thanx && cheers,
Martin
>
> Good luck,
>
> Tom
>
>
> Martin Grotzke schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > with our application we have the issue, that we get different
>
Hello,
with our application we have the issue, that we get different
results for singular and plural searches (german language).
E.g. for "hose" we get 1.000 documents back, but for "hosen"
we get 10.000 docs. The same applies to "t-shirt" or "t-shirts",
of e.g. "hut" and "hüte" - lots of cases :
Hello,
I have an issue, that "T-Shirt" is not found, even if there
are documents with the title "T-Shirt".
The analysis page shows that both the index-analyzer and the
query-analyzer create "t" and "shirt" of this.
However, when I search for "t-shirt", I don't find anything.
The product title i
t; some cases, but the impl for ConstantScoreQuery (which is used when the
> SolrQueryParser sees a range query or a prefix query) doesn't really work
> at the moment.)
Yep, I already had tried this, but it always failed with an
UnsupportedOperationException...
Thanx a lot,
cheers,
Martin
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 23:18 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : in my custom request handler, I want to determine which fields are
> : constrained by the user.
> :
> : E.g. the query (q) might be "ipod AND brand:apple" and there might
> : be a filter query (fq) like "color:white" (or more).
> :
> : W
Hello,
in my custom request handler, I want to determine which fields are
constrained by the user.
E.g. the query (q) might be "ipod AND brand:apple" and there might
be a filter query (fq) like "color:white" (or more).
What I want to know is that "brand" and "color" are constrained.
AFAICS I co
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 11:52 +0200, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> > > you're missing the key piece that Ard alluded to ... the
> > there is one
> > > ordere list of all terms stored in the index ... a TermEnum lets you
> > > iterate over this ordered list, and the
> > IndexReader.terms(Term) method
> >
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 11:41 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : > TermEnum terms = searcher.getReader().terms(new Term(field, ""));
> : > while (terms.term() != null && terms.term().field() == field){
> : > //do things
> : > terms.next();
> : > }
>
> : while( te.next() )
t message i just noticed something i
> > > definitely didn't spot before...
> > >
> > > >> Fairly long: getFieldCacheCounts for the cat field takes ~70 ms
> > > >> for the second request, while reading prices takes ~600 ms.
> &g
ctually makes a lot of sense since there are probably a lot fewer
> unique values for the cat field, so there are a lot fewer discrete values
> to deal with when computing counts.
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
a lot of sense since there are probably a lot fewer
> unique values for the cat field, so there are a lot fewer discrete values
> to deal with when computing counts.
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 23:32 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : This part (reading field values) takes fairly long compared
> : to the other fields (that use getFacetTermEnumCounts or
> : getFieldCacheCounts as implemented in SimpleFacets), so that
> : I asume that there is potential for optimization
Hi,
I have a custom Facet implementation that extends SimpleFacets
and overrides getTermCounts( String field ).
For the price field I calculate available ranges, for this I
have to read the values for this field. Right this looks like
this:
public NamedList getTermCounts( final String field
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 12:39 -0700, Thiago Jackiw wrote:
> Is there a way for a record to belong to multiple facets? If so, how
> would one go about implementing it?
>
> What I'd like to accomplish would be something like:
>
> record A:
> name="John Doe"
> category_facet="Cars"
> category_facet="E
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 11:56 -0700, Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 5-Jul-07, at 11:43 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a document with a name field like this:
> > MP3-Player, Apple, »iPod nano«, silber,
> > 4GB
> >
> > and want to
Hi all,
I have a document with a name field like this:
MP3-Player, Apple, »iPod nano«, silber,
4GB
and want to find "apple". Unfortunately, I only find "apple,"...
Can anybody help me with this?
The schema.xml containts the following field definition
and this fieldType definition for type te
here's a
> formula for that that works well in a single pass over a bunch of values
> right?
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
al
> sized ranges, rounded ranges, etc.
I just had a conversation with our customer and they also want to
have it like this - adjusting with a new facet constraint...
Cheers,
Martin
>
> - will
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ers,
Martin
>
> We are working on a solr plugin.
>
> -John
>
> On 6/26/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 26-Jun-07, at 3:01 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > > AFAICS I do not have the possibility to specify range queries in my
>
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 16:48 -0700, Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 26-Jun-07, at 3:01 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > AFAICS I do not have the possibility to specify range queries in my
> > application, as I do not have a clue what's the lowest and highest
> > price in the search
those should all be easy to
> compute using the ValueSource from the field type (it would be nice if
> FieldType's had some way of indicating which DocValues function can best
> manage the field type, but we can always assume float or have an option
> for dictating it ... people might want
Hi,
my documents (products) have a price field, and I want to have
a "dynamically" calculated range facet for that in the response.
E.g. I want to have this in the response
price:[* TO 20] -> 23
price:[20 TO 40] -> 42
price:[40 TO *] -> 33
if prices are between 0 and 60
but
price:[* TO 100] -
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:49 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : > I solve this problem by having metadata stored in my index which tells
> : > my custom request handler what fields to facet on for each category ...
> : How do you define this metadata?
>
> this might be a good place to start, note th
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 12:59 +0200, Thomas Traeger wrote:
> Martin Grotzke schrieb:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:16 +0200, Thomas Traeger wrote:
[...]
> >> I think it would be really nice, if I don't have to know which facets
> >> fields are there at query time, ins
prop3 and prop4 if
facet.query.count is 2.
Just thinking about that... :)
Cheers,
Martin
>
> What do the experts think about this?
>
> Tom
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ntions and say things like facet.field=facet_*
> but that in general trying to do something like facet.field=* would be a
> very bad idea even if it was supported.
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247
>
>
> -Hoss
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r is done by another module in our application, and not
with java.
Cheers,
Martin
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/6/07 13:07, "Martin Grotzke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
> >> H
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
> exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
> org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
> main
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:10 -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On May 22, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> > For sure, perhaps the schema field element could be extended by an
> > attribute "isfacet"
>
> There is no effective difference between a "facet&qu
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 13:06 -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On May 22, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> >> You need to specify the constrants (facet.query or facet.field
> >> params)
> > Too bad, so we would have either to know the schema in the application
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:44 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:07 -0400, Will Johnson wrote:
> > > Possible solutions inline:
> > >
> > > 1) I use facets and want to re
ry but are NOT in the set of 1000 ids that they already saved.
> Is this possible?
>
> Even more reason to save the queries and not the id's. then its
>
> (query1expr) NOT (query2expr)
>
> - will
>
>
>
>
> ________
> __
but that is all for now. Join the
> mailing list to see more improvements in the future.
>
> Also.. how do I get added to the Using Solr wiki page?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Austin
>
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
65 matches
Mail list logo
