On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On 10/25/07, Max Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible that the prefix-processing ignores the filters? > > Yes, It's a known limitation that we haven't worked out a fix for yet. > The issue is that you can't just run the prefix through the filters > because of things like stop words, stemming, minimum length filters, > etc. What about not having only "facet.prefix" but additionally "facet.filtered.prefix" that runs the prefix through the filters? Would that be possible?
Cheers, Martin > > -Yonik >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
