On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 10:44 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : Probably I'm also interested in PrefixQueries, as they also provide a
> : Term, e.g. parsing "ipod AND brand:apple" gives a PrefixQuery for
> : "brand:apple".
> 
> uh? ... it shoudn't, not unless we're talking about some other
> customization you've already made.
My fault, this is returned for s.th. like "brand:appl*" - but perhaps
I would also like to facet on such fields then...

> 
> 
> : I want to do s.th. like "dynamic faceting" - so that the solr client
> : does not have to request facets via facet.field, but that I can decide
> : in my CustomRequestHandler which facets are returned. But I want to
> : return only facets for fields that are not already constained, e.g.
> : when the query contains s.th. like "brand:apple" I don't want to return
> : a facet for the field "brand".
> 
> Hmmm, i see ... well the easiest way to go is not to worry about it when
> parsing the query, when you go to compute facets for all hte fields you
> tink might be useful, you'll see that only one value for "brand" matches,
> and you can just skip it.
I would think that this is not the best option in terms of performance.

> 
> that doesn't really work well for range queries -- but you can't exactly
> use the same logic for picking what your facet contraints will be on a
> field that makes sense to do a rnage query on anyway, so it's tricky
> either way.
> 
> the custom QueryParser is still probably your best bet...
> 
> : Ok, so I would override getFieldQuery, getPrefixQuery, getRangeQuery and
> : getWildcardQuery(?) and record the field names? And I would use this
> : QueryParser for both parsing of the query (q) and the filter queries
> : (fq)?
> 
> yep.
Alright, then I'll choose this door.

> 
> (Also Note there is also an extractTerms method on Query that can help in
> some cases, but the impl for ConstantScoreQuery (which is used when the
> SolrQueryParser sees a range query or a prefix query) doesn't really work
> at the moment.)
Yep, I already had tried this, but it always failed with an
UnsupportedOperationException...

Thanx a lot,
cheers,
Martin


> 
> -Hoss
> 
-- 
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to