On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 15:10 -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote: > On May 22, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote: > > For sure, perhaps the schema field element could be extended by an > > attribute "isfacet" > > There is no effective difference between a "facet" field and any > other indexed field. What fields are "facets" is application > specific and not really something Solr should be responsible for. > > In Solr Flare (an evolving Ruby on Rails plugin), we made the > decision to use naming conventions to determine what fields are > facets. *_facet named fields are facets. Maybe that convention > would work in your scenario also? Yes, this is an option, good idea.
Thanx && cheers, Martin > > Erik >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
