i downloaded and installed a fresh jboss (jboss-4.2.1.GA) and updated run.bat
and jboss-service.xml
then deployed solr war in the deploy folder.
but still it is showing the same message on jboss
startup.:confused::confused:
con wrote:
>
> Thanks Hossman
>
> As per my understandings and inve
For the standard query handler, try [* TO *].
Bill
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> With dismax you can use q.alt when the q param is missing:
> q.alt=*:*
> should work.
>
> -Jay
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jonathan Vanasco
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jay & Matt
> >
> > I
The two jar files are all you should need, and the configuration is correct.
However I noticed that you are on Solr 1.3. I haven't tested the Lucid
KStemmer on a non-Lucid-certified distribution of 1.3. I have tested it on
recent versions of 1.4 and it works fine (just tested with the most recent
n
i was able to declare a field type when the i use the lucid distribution of
solr
But if i copy the two jars and put it in lib directory of apache solr
distribution it still gives me the following error.
SEVERE: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/solr/u
i was able to declare a field type when the i use the lucid distribution of
solr
But if i copy the two jars and put it in lib directory of apache solr
distribution it still gives me the following error.
SEVERE: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/solr/util/pl
With dismax you can use q.alt when the q param is missing:
q.alt=*:*
should work.
-Jay
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> Thanks Jay & Matt
>
> I tried *:* on my app, and it didn't work
>
> I tried it on the solr admin, and it did
>
> I checked the solr config file, and
Thanks Jay & Matt
I tried *:* on my app, and it didn't work
I tried it on the solr admin, and it did
I checked the solr config file, and realized that it works on
standard, but not on dismax, queries
So i have my app checking *:* on a standard qt, and then filtering
what I need on other q
Use: ?q=*:*
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> I'm using Solr for seach and faceted browsing
>
> Is it possible to have solr search for 'everything' , at least as far as q
> is concerned ?
>
> The request handlers I've found don't li
Query for *:*
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I'm using Solr for seach and faceted browsing
Is it possible to have solr search for 'everything' , at least as
far as q is concerned ?
The request handlers I've found don't like it if I don't pass in a
I'm using Solr for seach and faceted browsing
Is it possible to have solr search for 'everything' , at least as far
as q is concerned ?
The request handlers I've found don't like it if I don't pass in a q
parameter
IMO forcing the users to do configuration change in Solr or in their
application is the same thing - it all boils down to configuration
change (I'll be very surprised if someone is actually hardcoding the
Solr URL in their system - most probably it is configurable, and if it's
not, forcing them
I guess you are looking for terms, Its in 1.4
just use a query like
http://localhost:port
/solr/terms/?terms=true&terms.fl=filed_name&terms.prefix=da
Thanks/Regards,
Parvez
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Yerraguntla wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use autoSuggest in Solr 1.4. Is au
Hi,
I can confirm it works! :-)
Regards,
Lukas
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
>
> Yes, 2nd edition; but subscription-based "Manning Early Access Program"
> (MEAP) is available, $13.75 (today only...), plus Author Online:
> http://www.manning-sandbox.com/forum.jspa?forumID
Hi,
I've done a few experiments with searching two cores with the same
schema using the shard syntax. (using solr 1.3)
My use case is that I want to have multiple cores because a few
different people will be managing the indexing, and that will happen at
different times. The data, however, i
I'm running into an odd issue with multi-word synonyms in Solr (using
the latest [9/14/09] nightly ). Things generally seem to work as
expected, but I sometimes see words that are the leading term in a
multi-word synonym being replaced with the token that follows them in
the stream when they should
Hi,
I am trying to use autoSuggest in Solr 1.4. Is autoSugest service available
by default like select? or should I configure anything?
Solrconfig.xml contains the termcomponent defined.
Thanks
R
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-1.4---autoSuggestis-it-a-defau
Is there a way to load the synonyms dynamically.
I mean if the synonym.txt file changes then during query time the newly
added synonym should be active.
Currently it required a reindex
Thanks/Regards,
Parvez
Yes, 2nd edition; but subscription-based "Manning Early Access Program"
(MEAP) is available, $13.75 (today only...), plus Author Online:
http://www.manning-sandbox.com/forum.jspa?forumID=451
http://www.manning.com/hatcher3/
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@g
Why don't you create a synonym for + that expands to your customers
product name that includes the plus? You can even have your FE do
this sort of replacement BEFORE submitting to Solr.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:42 AM, AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
Thanks Ahmet,
Thats excellent, t
3rd edition?! *whew* - let's get the 2nd edition in print first ;)
Erik
On Sep 14, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
http://www.manning.com/ingersoll/
And other books too, such as Lucene in Action 3rd edition... PDF
only (MEAP)
"Today Only! Save 50% on any ebook! This offer a
Ok i downlaod the lucid imaginationversion of Solr.
>From the lib directory i copied the two jars
lucid-kstem.jar and lucid-solr-kstem.jar
and put in my local solr instance
at
C:\solr\apache-solr-1.3.0\lib
When i declare a field type like this
its throwing class
Ok i downlaod the lucid imaginationversion of Solr.
>From the lib directory i copied the two jars
lucid-kstem.jar and lucid-solr-kstem.jar
and put in my local solr instance
at
C:\solr\apache-solr-1.3.0\lib
When i declare a field type like this
its throwin
is the source for the lucid kstemmer available ? from the lucid solr
package i only found the compiled jars
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM, darniz wrote:
>> Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to try KStem. I'm following the
> Thanks Ahmet,
>
> Thats excellent, thanks :) I may have to increase the
> gramsize to take into account other possible uses but i can
> now read around these filters to make the adjustments.
>
> With regard to WordDelimiterFilterFactory. Is there a way
> to place a delimiter on this filter to s
Greetings,
It's time for another Hadoop/Lucene/Apache"Cloud" Stack meetup!
This month it'll be on Wednesday, the 30th, at 6:45 pm.
We should have a few interesting guests this time around -- someone from
Facebook may be stopping by to talk about Hive :)
We've had great attendance in the past fe
I am trying configure an request handler that will be uses in the Auto
Complete Query.
I am limiting the result to one field by using the "fl" parameter, which can
be used to specify field to return.
How to make the field return only one word not full sentences.
Thanks/Regards,
Parvez
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:56 PM, darniz wrote:
> Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to try KStem. I'm following the instructions on this page:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem
>>
>> ... but the download link doesn't work.
>>
>> Is anyone know the new
Pascal Dimassimo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to try KStem. I'm following the instructions on this page:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters/Kstem
>
> ... but the download link doesn't work.
>
> Is anyone know the new location to download KStem?
>
I am stuck with the
Hello,
Let me preface this by admitting that I'm still fairly new to Lucene and
Solr, so I apologize if any of this sounds naive and I'm open to
thinking about my problem differently.
I'm currently responsible for a rather large dataset of business records
that I'm trying to build a Lucene/S
Interesting. I thought that would be the 'hard' approach rather than
add a filter, but i guess thats all it really is anyway.
Has this been done before? Build a filter to transform a word there
and back?
On 14 Sep 2009, at 17:17, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Paul Forsyth schrieb:
Hi Erick,
Yes, I think it is better to be backward compatible or the impact of moving
to the new solr version would be big.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Uri Boness wrote:
>
> > Is it really a problem? I mean, a
http://www.manning.com/ingersoll/
And other books too, such as Lucene in Action 3rd edition... PDF only (MEAP)
"Today Only! Save 50% on any ebook! This offer applies to all final ebooks
or ebook editions purchased through the Manning Early Access Program. Enter
code pop0914 in the Promotional Code
Hi guys,
I'm getting an exception while in the middle of a batch indexing job. Can
anybody help me figure this out?
Error: Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port)
is normally permitted 127.0.0.1:8080
Solr is 1.4 on Tomcat.
Big thanks.
Rihaed
Hi Erick,
In this specific case my client does have a new product with a '+' at
the end. Its just one of those odd ones!
Customers are expected to put + into the search box so i have to have
results to show.
I hear your concerns though. Originally i thought I would need to
transform the
Before you go too much further with this, I've just got to ask whetherthe
use case for searching "product+" really serves your customers.
If you mess around with analyzers to make things include the "+",
what does that mean for "&"? "*"? "."? any other weird character
you can think of?
Would it be
Paul Forsyth schrieb:
Hi Erick,
In this specific case my client does have a new product with a '+' at
the end. Its just one of those odd ones!
Customers are expected to put + into the search box so i have to have
results to show.
I hear your concerns though. Originally i thought I would need
Thanks Ahmet,
Thats excellent, thanks :) I may have to increase the gramsize to take
into account other possible uses but i can now read around these
filters to make the adjustments.
With regard to WordDelimiterFilterFactory. Is there a way to place a
delimiter on this filter to still get
Good idea. Thanks.
Also, in such architecture (Master/Slave), is there any best practices for
index stored on an NFS mounted filesystem ?
Specially about the rsync step, when the "slaves" want to synchronize their
index from a remote filesystem (pb of inconsistent views of the directory).
Nou
With words like 'product+' i'd expect a search for '+' to return
results like any other character or word, so '+' would be found within
'product+' or similar text.
I've tried removing the worddelimiter from the query analyzer,
restarting and reindexing but i get the same result. Nothing is
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Uri Boness wrote:
> Is it really a problem? I mean, as i see it, solr to cores is what RDBMS is
> to databases. When you connect to a database you also need to specify the
> database name.
>
>
The problem is compatibility. If we make solr.xml compulsory then we on
I concur with Uri, but I would also add that it might be helpful to specify
a default core to use somewhere in the configuration file.
So that if no core is specified, the default one will be implicitly
selected.
I am not sure if this feature is available yet.
What do you think?
On Mon, Sep 14,
--- On Mon, 9/14/09, Paul Forsyth wrote:
> From: Paul Forsyth
> Subject: Re: Searching for the '+' character
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, September 14, 2009, 5:55 PM
> With words like 'product+' i'd expect
> a search for '+' to return results like any other character
> or
Is it really a problem? I mean, as i see it, solr to cores is what
RDBMS is to databases. When you connect to a database you also need to
specify the database name.
Cheers,
Uri
On Sep 14, 2009, at 16:27, Noble Paul നോബിള് नो
ब्ळ् wrote:
The problem is that, if we use multicore it forc
I am using 1.3
Do you suggest 1.4 from developer trunk? I am concern if it stable. Is it
safe to use it in big commerce app?
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्-2 wrote:
>
> which version of Solr are you using. can you try with a recent one and
> confirm this?
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:45 PM, pale
which version of Solr are you using. can you try with a recent one and
confirm this?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:45 PM, palexv wrote:
>
> I know that my issue is related to
> http://www.nabble.com/dataimporthandler-and-multiple-delta-import-td19160129.html#a19160129
> and https://issues.apache.org/
The problem is that, if we use multicore it forces you to use a core
name. this is inconvenient. We must get rid of this restriction before
we move single-core to multicore.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Uri Boness wrote:
> +1
> Can you add a JIRA issue for that so we can vote for it?
>
> Ch
> Hi Ahmet,
>
> I believe its the WhitespaceTokenizerFactory, but i may be
> wrong.
>
> I've pasted the schema.xml into http://pastie.org/616162
>
I looked at your field type named text.
WordDelimiterFilterFactory is eating up '+'
You can use .../solr/admin/analysis.jsp tool to see behaviour
you can put both master1 and master2 behind a VIP.
If Master 1 goes down make the VIP point to Master2
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:11 PM, nourredine khadri
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A question about scalability.
>
> Let imagine the following architecture based on Master/Slave schema :
>
> - A "master" for
I know that my issue is related to
http://www.nabble.com/dataimporthandler-and-multiple-delta-import-td19160129.html#a19160129
and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-728
but my case is quite different.
As I understand patch at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-728
prevents concurr
Hi Ahmet,
I believe its the WhitespaceTokenizerFactory, but i may be wrong.
I've pasted the schema.xml into http://pastie.org/616162
On 14 Sep 2009, at 14:29, AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
Hi all,
I need some help with a curious problem i can't find a
solution for. I am somewhat of a newbie with the
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
Hi again,
I've mostly gotten the multicore working except for one detail.
(I'm using solr 1.3 and solr-ruby 0.0.6 in a rails project.)
I've done a few queries and I appear to be able to get hits from either
core.
Hi,
A question about scalability.
Let imagine the following architecture based on Master/Slave schema :
- A "master" for the indexation called Master 1
- A backup of Master 1 (called Master 2)
- Several "slaves" for search linked to Master 1
Can I configure the "slaves" to be automatically lin
> Hi all,
>
> I need some help with a curious problem i can't find a
> solution for. I am somewhat of a newbie with the various
> analyzers and handlers and how they work together, so im
> looking for advice on how to proceed with my issue.
>
> I have content with text like 'product+' which has b
Thanks, I'll see if I can reproduce...
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:10 AM, mike anderson wrote:
> Yeah.. that was weird. removing the line "forever,for ever" from my synonyms
> file fixed the problem. In fact, i was having the same problem for every
> double w
I just copied this information to the wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRequestHandler
-Peter
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> RequestHandlers are configured in solrconfig.xml. If no components are
> explicitly declared in the request handler config the the defaults are u
Hi,
I hope someone can help me in my search for finding the right solution for
my search application. I hope I'm not repeating a question that has been
asked before, but I could not find a similar question out there. So that is
why I'm asking it here...
Here goes:
My index contains documents wh
Hi all,
I need some help with a curious problem i can't find a solution for. I
am somewhat of a newbie with the various analyzers and handlers and
how they work together, so im looking for advice on how to proceed
with my issue.
I have content with text like 'product+' which has been inde
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding the copyField directive in schema.xml
1. Does the destination field store a reference or the actual data ?
If I have soemthing like this
then will the values in the 'name' field get copied into the 'text' field or
will the 'text' field only store a referenc
I'm not familiar w/ Eclipse, but do you need to set solr.solr.home?
Perhaps http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat can help too.
On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
I'ld like to set up Eclipse to run solr (in Tomcat for example), but
struggling with the issue that I can'
if you wish to use conditional copy you can use a RegexTransformer
this means that if guid!= null 'id' will be set to guid
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> As I said, copying is not an option. That will break everything else.
>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Noble P
As I said, copying is not an option. That will break everything else.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
The XPathRecordreader has a limit one mapping per xpath. So copying is
the best solution
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Fergus McMenemie
wrote:
I'm tryi
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, dharhsana wrote:
>
>
> This is my coding where i add fileds for blog details to solr,
>
> SolrInputDocument solrInputDocument = new SolrInputDocument();
> solrInputDocument.addField("blogTitle","$Never Fails$");
> solrInputDocument.addField("blogId","$Never Fai
62 matches
Mail list logo
