Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Paul Rosen <p...@performantsoftware.com>wrote:
Hi again,
I've mostly gotten the multicore working except for one detail.
(I'm using solr 1.3 and solr-ruby 0.0.6 in a rails project.)
I've done a few queries and I appear to be able to get hits from either
core. (yeah!)
I'm forming my request like this:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(
:start => start,
:rows => max,
:sort => sort_param,
:query => query,
:filter_queries => filter_queries,
:field_list => @field_list,
:facets => {:fields => @facet_fields, :mincount => 1, :missing => true,
:limit => -1},
:highlighting => {:field_list => ['text'], :fragment_size => 600},
:shards => @cores)
If I leave ":shards => @cores" out, then the response includes:
'facet_counts' => {
'facet_dates' => {},
'facet_queries' => {},
'facet_fields' => { 'myfacet' => [ etc...], etc... }
which is what I expect.
If I add the ":shards => @cores" back in (so that I'm doing the exact
request above), I get:
'facet_counts' => {
'facet_dates' => {},
'facet_queries' => {},
'facet_fields' => {}
so I've lost my facet information.
Why would it correctly find my documents, but not report the facet info?
I'm not a ruby guy but the response format in both the cases is exactly the
same so I don't think there is any problem with the ruby client parsing. Can
you check the Solr logs to see if there were any exceptions when you sent
the shards parameter?
I don't see any exceptions. The solr activity is pretty different for
the two cases. Without the shards, it makes one call that looks
something like this (I ellipsed the id and field parameters for clarity):
Sep 14, 2009 9:32:09 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [resources] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={facet.limit=-1&wt=ruby&rows=30&start=0&facet=true&facet.mincount=1&q=(rossetti)&fl=archive,...,license&qt=standard&facet.missing=true&hl.fl=text&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl.fragsize=600&hl=true}
hits=27 status=0 QTime=6
Note that "facet=true".
With the shards, it has five lines for the single call that I make:
Sep 14, 2009 9:37:18 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [exhibits] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={wt=javabin&rows=30&start=0&facet=true&fl=uri,score&q=(rossetti)&version=2.2&isShard=true&facet.missing=true&hl.fl=text&fsv=true&hl.fragsize=600&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl=false}
hits=6 status=0 QTime=0
Sep 14, 2009 9:37:18 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [resources] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={wt=javabin&rows=30&start=0&facet=true&fl=uri,score&q=(rossetti)&version=2.2&isShard=true&facet.missing=true&hl.fl=text&fsv=true&hl.fragsize=600&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl=false}
hits=27 status=0 QTime=3
Sep 14, 2009 9:37:18 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [resources] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={facet.limit=-1&wt=javabin&rows=30&start=0&ids=...,...&facet=false&facet.mincount=1&q=(rossetti)&fl=archive,...,uri&version=2.2&facet.missing=true&isShard=true&hl.fl=text&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl.fragsize=600&hl=true}
status=0 QTime=35
Sep 14, 2009 9:37:18 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [exhibits] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={facet.limit=-1&wt=javabin&rows=30&start=0&ids=...,...&facet=false&facet.mincount=1&q=(rossetti)&fl=archive,...,uri&version=2.2&facet.missing=true&isShard=true&hl.fl=text&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl.fragsize=600&hl=true}
status=0 QTime=41
Sep 14, 2009 9:37:18 AM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [resources] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={facet.limit=-1&wt=ruby&rows=30&start=0&facet=true&facet.mincount=1&q=(rossetti)&fl=archive,...,license&qt=standard&facet.missing=true&hl.fl=text&facet.field=genre&facet.field=archive&facet.field=freeculture&hl.fragsize=600&hl=true&shards=localhost:8983/solr/resources,localhost:8983/solr/exhibits}
status=0 QTime=57
Note that on the third and fourth lines, "facet=false". Is that significant?
Thanks,
Paul
