On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Uri Boness <ubon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it really a problem? I mean, as i see it, solr to cores is what RDBMS is > to databases. When you connect to a database you also need to specify the > database name. > > The problem is compatibility. If we make solr.xml compulsory then we only force people to do a configuration change. But if we make a core name mandatory, then we force them to change their applications (or the applications' configurations). It is better if we can avoid that. Besides, if there's only one core, why need a name? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
