On 11/18/2010 06:42 PM, Pascal Georges wrote:
Hi,
> 2010/11/17:
>> From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06
>> Hi,
2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart:
Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine
run up to the move number spe
2010/11/17 :
> From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06
> Hi,
>>> 2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart :
>>> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine
>>> run up to the move number specified.
>>
>> Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ?
From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr]
Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06
Hi,
>> 2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart :
>> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine
>> run up to the move number specified.
>
> Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ?
Yes.
> If so it sho
2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart :
> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine run
> up to the move number specified.
Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ?
If so it should remain in place as it is useful for some people (like me).
Pascal
On 11/16/2010 12:35 AM, Joost 't Hart wrote:
Consolidation. See below.
One new question:
How do we prefer to manually interfere with the machinery, should we
need this.
There are two machines that can/need to be stopped. The engine and the
autoplay function. Actually, there is a third notion:
From: Alexander Wagner [mailto:a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Tue 16-11-2010 15:55
Hi,
> On 11/16/10 12:40, joost.t.h...@planet.nl wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> Also, in my opinion, "engine reports blunder" is too long and
>>> inaccurate (can you call blunder a difference of +0.1
>>> in evalua
Van: Fulvio [mailto:f...@libero.it]
Verzonden: di 16-11-2010 09:26
Hi,
> Joost 't Hart wrote:
>
>> If you do not enable short annotations, the engine will present
>> variations with
>> - it's name
>> - a score tag (with UCI engines, I replaced the bogus 327.xy value with
>> Mx (or M-x) as is d
Joost 't Hart wrote:
>
> If you do not enable short annotations, the engine will present
> variations with
> - it's name
> - a score tag (with UCI engines, I replaced the bogus 327.xy value with
> Mx (or M-x) as is done in the engine window. Good idea?)
> - the known remark "engine reports blunde
Hi scid user,
This is about the behaviour that we would like to see with annotation:
I am happily looking at the following:
"For moves (only)"
Only moves of the selected color (or both) are annotated, except the
final move of game/variation, which is always annotated.
This is not different fr
