2010/11/17 <joost.t.h...@planet.nl>: > From: Pascal Georges [mailto:pascal.georg...@free.fr] > Sent: Wed 17-11-2010 13:06 > Hi, >>> 2010/11/17 Joost 't Hart <joost.t.h...@planet.nl>: >>> Decided to remove the annotator string completely and let the engine >>> run up to the move number specified. >> >> Do you mean the "Annotator opBlunder" one ? > > Yes. >> If so it should remain in place as it is useful for some people (like >> me). > > Fair enough, and thanks for getting involved. > > But please be invited to dig a little deeper than this... > > Can you explain the desired behaviour? I recently fixed the operation > that adds an annotator tag, as it used to destroy everything that was > already in the game's extra-tags section. > > The code that adds the opBlunder annotator tag is activated every move, > as soon as "book" is left. This means that a complete poem of tags > is added, depending on how deep the opening search goes. It also means > that since the fix the poem can actually be read :-) . > > Should not be, right, or should it?
I did not check CVS for some time. The desired behavior is to have a tag that points where an opening blunder was played. I see no poetry in Scid 4.2.2, simply opBlunder is a way to check a bunch of games but only up to the Nth plies. "opBlunder" is not an untranslated tag but something anybody can look at when searching for games with a blunder in the opening. > Which tag is the one you're looking for? The first one, after we go out > of book, or the final one, at the end of the opening search? The first one is the best, but the third blunder can be also useful. > I guess, so far you were used to seeing only the last one? > On the other hand, only the first tag can possibly be meaningful, since > once out of book we do not return anyway... > > Does opBlunder refer to some untranslated string? Or is this "the name > of the annotator"? Putting the opBlunder token in the Annotator filed was a choice, but indeed meaningless (it is nothing to do with an Annotator name). So it could go anywhere if a better place is found. > What does the color in the annotator tag tell you? My impression was > that the implementation might be wrong, in that if it is Black to go > out of book first, "white" is added to the tag at that moment. 7 (white) means white blundered at move 7. > Finally: Do you expect the opBlunder tag to replace the default engine > annotator tag (suppose the user checks that annotation option as well), > or do you expect them both (in a comma-separated list)? Both, I think. Pascal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
