Conclusion: (Was rexec via xinetd help)

2003-07-14 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
Original Message- From: SAWYER Charlotte M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:57 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: rexec via xinetd help Well, below is the tcpdump output from the linux desktop to the linux server -- happens to be easier to capture tc

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-03 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
LISTENING 981/dev/gpmctl unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 1036 /tmp/.font-unix/fs7100 == -Original Message- From: Hermann Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rexec

Re: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-03 Thread Hermann Kaiser
aiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: rexec via xinetd help > > > Try rexec 10.15.38.25 'ls' and the .netrc file is in the root-home > of css38025. I tried it myself from an AIX box to a RH7.

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-03 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
ubject: Re: rexec via xinetd help Try rexec 10.15.38.25 'ls' and the .netrc file is in the root-home of css38025. I tried it myself from an AIX box to a RH7.3 box, and it worked perfect. In my try I didn't quoted the password, but I think it's just an example ;-). >From what ki

Re: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread Hermann Kaiser
== > contents of .netrc file in user DOR's home directory (/home/DOR)= > > machine 10.15.38.25 login DOR password 'password'

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
password 'password' == debugging output from xinetd process--fresh re-start== == [EMAIL PROTECTED] DOR]# xinetd -d 03/7/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:33:17: ERROR: 3828 {handle_includedir} /etc/xinetd.d/hold is

Re: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread Hermann Kaiser
ent of > it be and in what syntax? > > -Original Message- > From: Hermann Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: rexec via xinetd help > > > hmm, you get simple a timeout on the rexe

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
YEAH!!! A solid lead! So the .netrc file is in the users' directory? What should the content of it be and in what syntax? -Original Message- From: Hermann Kaiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rexec via xinetd

Re: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread Hermann Kaiser
00, SAWYER Charlotte M wrote: > Yeap, the daemon is running -- triggered from xinetd > Don't need (or WANT) root -- would like to use the config options of xinetd > to control which hosts can do this. > > Below are outputs from: > ==

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
t: RE: rexec via xinetd help The one thing I see that on one has addressed: sftp and ssh. ftp will not work over ssh. before you can execute anything you must set up a secure tunnel between the servers if ssh is the only connection method besides telent, rlogin, etc. mayby something to go on.

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread Bob Buckley
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of SAWYER Charlotte M Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:34 PM To: Red Hat List Serve (E-mail) Subject: rexec via xinetd help I have a situation where I apparently HAVE to use rexec to get one server (a non-linux system) to run a script on a

RE: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
Yeap, the daemon is running -- triggered from xinetd Don't need (or WANT) root -- would like to use the config options of xinetd to control which hosts can do this. Below are outputs from: USER DE

Re: rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread Hermann Kaiser
Is the rexec daemon installed? (/usr/sbin/in.rexecd) What is /var/log/messages telling you? If you need to run the rexec call as root, include rexec in /etc/securetty Hope it helps ... ciao, Hermann On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:34:10AM -0700, SAWYER Charlotte M wrote: > I have a situation where I ap

rexec via xinetd help

2003-07-02 Thread SAWYER Charlotte M
I have a situation where I apparently HAVE to use rexec to get one server (a non-linux system) to run a script on a linux server (lin2). I have very little influence over the configuration of the non-linux server. I have almost total control over how the linux server is configured. In it's current

Re: xinetd...some input needed

2003-06-25 Thread Eric Wood
RH's chkconfig command can turn on and off system services as well as xinetd services: # chkconfig sendmail off # chkconfig rsync off # chkconfig telnet on # chkconfg postgresql on Of course, chkconfig won't configure your services. You'll have to use other tools or edit config

Re: How to activate TFTP Server on XINETD...?

2003-06-24 Thread Edward Dekkers
Jonathan R Raon wrote: Hello to everyone, I am a new user of Linux and I found out that I can make many things out from this machine to our LAN/WAN network. But one thing I cannot make is activating TFTP server on XINETD. I already made it on INETD from RH6.2, But since I am using RH9 with

How to activate TFTP Server on XINETD...?

2003-06-24 Thread Jonathan R Raon
Hello to everyone, I am a new user of Linux and I found out that I can make many things out from this machine to our LAN/WAN network. But one thing I cannot make is activating TFTP server on XINETD. I already made it on INETD from RH6.2, But since I am using RH9 with XINETD content, I can&#

Re: xinetd...some input needed

2003-06-24 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
xinetd is typically configured by text files in /etc/xinetd.d You should see some good examples there. And the man pages always help. :) Ben - Original Message - From: "Jason Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 4

Re: xinetd...some input needed

2003-06-24 Thread MKlinke
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 22:13, Jason Williams wrote: > Hello everyone. I will try and make this as quick and brief as > possible. > > I was trying to find out more info on xinetd itself so I could learn > how to turn on and off daemons and services. For instance, I would > lik

xinetd...some input needed

2003-06-24 Thread Jason Williams
Hello everyone. I will try and make this as quick and brief as possible. I was trying to find out more info on xinetd itself so I could learn how to turn on and off daemons and services. For instance, I would like to setup a rsync server, but noticed that it is under the control of xinetd. But

RE: Redhat 9 - vsftpd and xinetd

2003-06-12 Thread Sebastiaan Mangoentinojo
trouble. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Sebastiaan Mangoentinojo Verzonden: donderdag 12 juni 2003 13:39 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Redhat 9 - vsftpd and xinetd I'm trying to get vsftpd on my freshly installed Redhat 9 server to

Redhat 9 - vsftpd and xinetd

2003-06-12 Thread Sebastiaan Mangoentinojo
Title: Bericht I'm trying to get vsftpd on my freshly installed Redhat 9 server to work via xinetd, mainly because I want to restrict ftp access to the localhost (for a php script). I tried using hosts.allow and hosts.deny like I did in the past, but I couldn't get it to work

RedHat 9 and xinetd-ipv6

2003-06-11 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Hello, Anyone know what happened to xinetd-ipv6 in RedHat 9? It was present in RedHat 7.x and 8.0 but it's gone from RedHat 9 and xinetd is only listening on IPv4 0.0.0.0. All the IPv6 access to xinetd services is now broken... Mike -- Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-30 Thread Redhat71
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:50:02AM +0800, Redhat71 wrote: >> > Nguyen, David M wrote: >> >> My machine does not have xinetd installed. Where can I get a >> download >> >> and how to install it? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-29 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 28-May-2003/10:34 +1000, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I agree completely, if you're not going to give actual direct help why >bother replying at all, Teaching someone that Google can be a treasure trove of information can be very helpful. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene

RE: pls do NOT abuse the list (was Re: xinetd)

2003-05-28 Thread Richard S. Crawford
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- -- Slainte, Richard S. Crawford AIM: Buffalo2K / Y!: rscrawford / ICQ: 11640404 http://www.mossroot.com http://www.stonegoose.com "It is only with our heart that we can see clearly. What is essential is invisible to the eye." --Antoine de Sa

RE: pls do NOT abuse the list (was Re: xinetd)

2003-05-28 Thread Edward Croft
Oh, (What you thought I was done???), one more thing about community. I stated in my previous missive that I wouldn't need this community if I knew it all, but that isn't true really is it? I need to give back, because that is what open source is about, giving back to the community. The other part

RE: pls do NOT abuse the list (was Re: xinetd)

2003-05-28 Thread Edward Croft
But seriously folks. .. I agree, pointing a person to google is beneficial. As long as it is done in a helpful manner. Enabling a person to help themselves by pointing them to the many resources available so that they can do their own research and in doing so learn. That is always a good thing

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-28 Thread Edward Croft
> > but on a redhat maillist, it's more like a SPAM ! > > No. It's nowhere near spam. In this particular case, it was not very > helpful, as it was obvious that the person was looking for a RH > related answer (as opposed to a generic answer), so I agree that folks > need to check when it's useful

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-28 Thread Dave Altonaga
I agree with the statement about doing a little research before asking for advice and I agree that simple replies as "google" are a waste. But! so are rants about those that say google, and yes also this one that I'm posting now. Even I, a newbie, (I've only been using RH since 7.0 was released)

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-27 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:50:02AM +0800, Redhat71 wrote: > > Nguyen, David M wrote: > >> My machine does not have xinetd installed. Where can I get a download > >> and how to install it? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> David > >> > >>

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-27 Thread Res
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Redhat71 wrote: I agree completely, if you're not going to give actual direct help why bother replying at all, your only making a nuisance of yourself by doing so, and one day when you want help, no-one is gonig to give it to you. I've seen people removed off lists for such

RE: pls do NOT abuse the list (was Re: xinetd)

2003-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amen and amen.to much childish ranting Original Message: - From: Redhat71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 07:50:02 +0800 (CST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd") > Nguyen, David M wrote: >> My machine d

Re: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-27 Thread Shaun T. Erickson
Take a frelling Valium, will you? Geez. :) -ste -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-27 Thread TheLight
ECTED] Subject: pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd") > Nguyen, David M wrote: >> My machine does not have xinetd installed. Where can I get a >> download and how to install it? >> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> > Do a google on 'xinet

pls do NOT abuse the list (was "Re: xinetd")

2003-05-27 Thread Redhat71
> Nguyen, David M wrote: >> My machine does not have xinetd installed. Where can I get a download >> and how to install it? >> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> > Do a google on 'xinetd' suggesting others to use google is a good thing itself, bu

Re: Xinetd with RH 9 causing 100% cpu utilization.

2003-04-03 Thread nate
Bart Reagan said: > After installing RH 9 (and RH 8.094 beta prior) I noticed that my CPU > utilization goes to 100%. The top process is xinetd. The current > shipping version is 2.3.10-6. If I downgrade to 2.3.7-5 the cpu > utilization returns to normal. > > Anyone else ex

Xinetd with RH 9 causing 100% cpu utilization.

2003-04-03 Thread Bart Reagan
After installing RH 9 (and RH 8.094 beta prior) I noticed that my CPU utilization goes to 100%. The top process is xinetd. The current shipping version is 2.3.10-6. If I downgrade to 2.3.7-5 the cpu utilization returns to normal. Anyone else experience this? Any suggestions other than

RE: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d'

2003-03-27 Thread winglion
>> > >> > try redirecting both stdout and stderr (file descriptor 2). i.e. >> > >> > xinetd -d >/tmp/debug.txt 2>&1 >> >> but the poster said he already tried redirecting with "&>", >> which is semantically equiv

RE: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d'

2003-03-27 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: Robert P. J. Day > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:00 AM > Subject: RE: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d' > > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > >

RE: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d'

2003-03-27 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: winglion > > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:56 AM > > Subject: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d' > > > > > > While I use xinetd -d to test

RE: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d'

2003-03-27 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: winglion > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 4:56 AM > Subject: how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d' > > > While I use xinetd -d to test my vsftpd seting! > There are a few error tell me that"bind address fa

how to redirect the output of command 'xinetd -d'

2003-03-27 Thread winglion
While I use xinetd -d to test my vsftpd seting! There are a few error tell me that"bind address fail (address already in use)" ! So I would like to redirect the output of this command, to show you the error message! Yet,neither "xinetd -d >debug.txt" nor xinetd -d &a

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-14 Thread Art Ross
r note, with the situation these students have created, is the > > best avenue to review the /var/log/messages file for clues of what is wrong or is > > there something in addition to it. One of the students was able to get their > > 'xinetd' up after adding a missing } in

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-14 Thread Michael Schwendt
ion to it. One of the students was able to get their > 'xinetd' up after adding a missing } in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file.We were > lead there by the messages file. In your case, if "/etc/init.d/xinetd restart" or "service xinetd restart" fails to start xinet

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-13 Thread Art Ross
ss wrote: > > > > I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was > > > > teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and > > > > encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their > > > > su

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-13 Thread Art Ross
ss wrote: > > > > I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was > > > > teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and > > > > encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their > > > > su

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
ration of Samba last night and > > > encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their > > > super daemon 'xinetd'. This only occurs on a couple of machines and > > > before I begin digging deeper, I was wondering if you could point in the > >

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-12 Thread Art Ross
Rick Johnson wrote: > Art Ross wrote: > > I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was > > teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and > > encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their > > super

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-11 Thread Rick Johnson
Art Ross wrote: I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their super daemon 'xinetd'. This only occurs on a couple of machines

Re: xinetd won't restart

2003-03-11 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 19:49, Art Ross wrote: > I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was > teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and > encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their > super daemon 'xi

xinetd won't restart

2003-03-11 Thread Art Ross
I run a Fundamentals of Linux class which is using RH7.3. I was teaching the installation and configuration of Samba last night and encountered a problem on some machines when the students restarted their super daemon 'xinetd'. This only occurs on a couple of machines and before I beg

RE: sendmail not working through xinetd in RH 8.0

2003-02-26 Thread Zhang, Anchi
, 2003 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sendmail not working through xinetd in RH 8.0 Trying to set up sendmail to run through xinetd in RH 8.0 fails as follows: 1) Start sendmail as standard daemon. Send mail out from server and send mail in to server from an outside source. Both work fine

sendmail not working through xinetd in RH 8.0

2003-02-26 Thread Jay Thompson
Trying to set up sendmail to run through xinetd in RH 8.0 fails as follows: 1) Start sendmail as standard daemon. Send mail out from server and send mail in to server from an outside source. Both work fine verifying that sendmail works. 2) Shut down the sendmail deamon (make sure it's not ru

Re: lpd in xinetd in Redhat 8.0

2003-02-20 Thread Ryan McDougall
I didnt know you could start lpd from xinetd. If you find a solution pleaselet me/us know. It sucks that I have to start up lpd every boot, even though I rarely use it. :( It should auto-start when ever a job gets sent. Cheers, Ryan On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 14:21, Jay Thompson wrote: > I

lpd in xinetd in Redhat 8.0

2003-02-19 Thread Jay Thompson
I am trying to configure lpd in xinetd. I am trying to run lpd from xinetd in Redhat 8.0. When I manually launch lpd from command line and send a print job, it works fine (confirming that printer setup and lpd are working). When I shut down lpd and activate lpd entry in xinetd.conf I get

Re: XINETD

2003-01-23 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 23 January 2003 12:57 pm, John Salamone wrote: > > Try this: > > [root@paradox slinky]# service xinetd status > > xinetd (pid 483) is running... > > Yes, this is the result I received OK< that's good.

Re: XINETD

2003-01-23 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 23 January 2003 10:49 pm, John Salamone wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone tell me how I can un-install xinetd and re-install it? First, verify that it works: [root@paradox slinky]# service xinetd status xinetd (pid 483) is running...

XINETD

2003-01-23 Thread John Salamone
Hi, Can someone tell me how I can un-install xinetd and re-install it? Every time I try to start a service , example are echo or telnet, which is associated with it I get the following msg "you must enable xinetd to start this service. I tried starting / stopping xinetd to no avail. I&#x

Re: XINETD

2003-01-23 Thread John Salamone
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 07:45 pm, John Salamone wrote: > > When I type /etc/init.d/xinetd restart I am suppose to be typing it in > > front of the # command prompt, correct? > > I've only been scanning this thread, so some of this may be redundant. > > Try

Re: XINETD

2003-01-23 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 22 January 2003 07:45 pm, John Salamone wrote: > When I type /etc/init.d/xinetd restart I am suppose to be typing it in > front of the # command prompt, correct? I've only been scanning this thread, so some of this may be redu

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Mike Burger
"chkconfig telnet on" On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, John Salamone wrote: > Hi, > > Every time I try to start certain services (telnet,echo) via the GUI after > check marking the box and highlighting the > service I get the following message "You must enable xinetd to use

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:58 pm, John Salamone wrote: > sorry, I should of said after I type chkconfig...blah which worked fine i > then typed service telnet status unrecognized service. just do /etc/init.d/xinetd restart, telnet is kind of a "sub-service" of xinetd, so ser

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
I'm taking a break from this for the night. Thanks for all your help, Dave!! I'll fool around with it tomorrow. John - Original Message - From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:47 PM Subject

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
sorry, I should of said after I type chkconfig...blah which worked fine i then typed service telnet status unrecognized service. - Original Message - From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:47 PM Subj

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:45 pm, John Salamone wrote: > When I type /etc/init.d/xinetd restart I am suppose to be typing it in > front of the # command prompt, correct? yes.. a # sign after the prompt mean you are currently the user "root" or the superuser. all these comm

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:39 pm, John Salamone wrote: > I'm using 8.0 dumb question, but did you hit enter after each command? chkconfig... blah.. chkconfig... blah.. if you did, which command came back with no such file or directory? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:37 pm, John Salamone wrote: > SSH is active. How do you use it? there's a server side (the daemon you just made active) and a client side to connect to a server running sshd do: ssh hostname like: ssh linux.rulz.after.you.play.with.it.for.a.year.or.two.homenetwo

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
When I type /etc/init.d/xinetd restart I am suppose to be typing it in front of the # command prompt, correct? - Original Message - From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:16 PM Subject: Re: XINETD >

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
I'm using 8.0 - Original Message - From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:34 PM Subject: Re: XINETD > On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:29 pm, John Salamone wrote: > > Dave, I tried all 3 b

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
SSH is active. How do you use it? - Original Message - From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:25 PM Subject: Re: XINETD > On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:12 pm, John Salamone wrote: > > Dave, > &

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:29 pm, John Salamone wrote: > Dave, I tried all 3 by typing as is : chkconfig xinetd on > > > chkconfig telnet on > > /etc/init.d/xinetd > > re

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
Dave, I tried all 3 by typing as is : chkconfig xinetd on > chkconfig telnet on > /etc/init.d/xinetd restart When I type it comes up saying no such file or directory. Now what? - Original M

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 4:12 pm, John Salamone wrote: > Dave, > > I tried it all and it did not work. Could it be that I have to do something > to the firewall? My network is set up as so: > > DSL cable modem which connects to my router / firewall which connects to > win 98 machine and a duelb

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
it. after this step just do: /etc/init.d/xinetd restart (which does that HUP thing I explained earlier) just to make sure xinetd re-reads that telnet, etc. should now be on sorry, I don't want to steer you in 30 different directions. So, re-cap just for fun: chkconfig xinetd on chkcon

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Salamone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:56 PM Subject: Re: XINETD John, don't sweat it.. it'll make sense after you play with it for a bit. lets start from scratch. first, make su

Fwd: Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
John, don't sweat it.. it'll make sense after you play with it for a bit. lets start from scratch. first, make sure xinetd starts when you reboot (xinetd is *really* what runs telnet, echo and a bunch of other things, if you want to see what it controls look at /etc/xinetd.d/) so x

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, John Salamone wrote: > The service XINETD is already running but when I start another service I get > the message stated earlier. You also need to make sure there is a config file for the new service in /etc/xinetd.d, and that the service is not disabled in that fil

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
Dave, So what am I suppose to be typing: CHKCONFIG XINETD ON ? If so, the what. I come back to the command prompt. Please bare with me as I am new to linux. Thanks for your help. - Original Message - From: "John Salamone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 3:28 pm, Dave Young wrote: > chkconfig xinetd on ; kill -HUP `cat /var/run/xinetd.pid` assuming it's running already. turn it on so next time we boot... but for now re-read the config. > > is one of the few ways to do this. > > "chkconfig

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Young
chkconfig xinetd on ; kill -HUP `cat /var/run/xinetd.pid` is one of the few ways to do this. "chkconfig on" basically creates a symlink from /etc/init.d/ to /etc/rc.d/rc.2/S## so when "init" comes through that dir (on boot) it runs all the S## with an argument of start

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
Mike, The service is checked off in the GUI list and I tried stopping and starting the service to no avail. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:19 PM Subject: Re: XINETD

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread mklinke
On your machine isn't one of the last items on the GUI list "xinetd"?? If so, check the box. If not, you may have at least two problems. Regards, Mike Klinke On Wednesday 22 January 2003 22:55, John Salamone wrote: > Hi, > > Every time I try to start certain servic

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
The service XINETD is already running but when I start another service I get the message stated earlier. - Original Message - From: "Ryan Babchishin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:07 PM Subject: Re: XINETD > >

Re: XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread Ryan Babchishin
I don't know anything about the GUI you're using, but I would suggest running: /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd start You can permenantly turn it on by running "setup" from the command line, then going to "System Services" and checking it off. Or by running "chkc

XINETD

2003-01-22 Thread John Salamone
Hi, Every time I try to start certain services (telnet,echo) via the GUI after check marking the box and highlighting the service I get the following message "You must enable xinetd to use this service" ? How do I do this? I appreciate your help. -- redhat-list mailing list u

portslave with xinetd

2003-01-20 Thread Robert Canary
Is anyone using portslaves ctlportslave. I am trying to set it up with the xinetd.d and the docs only mention the thing in one paragraph with a commandline which was written for the old style inetd. Can anyone tell me where I can find the docs on the ctlportslave at so I can see what the commadli

Re: XINETD

2002-12-09 Thread Eric Wood
2.3.9 was a blunder. The xinted guys think they've snagged the problem so a new xinetd package will be out any day. So stick with 2.3.7 for now. -eric wood - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Eduardo, > > Another fellow had the same question and pos

Re: XINETD

2002-12-05 Thread Rick Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi Everyone, | | According to RHSA-2002:196-09 the xinetd package should be upgraded to | version 2.3.9 which seems to still have the filedescriptor DOS vuln, but | on RHSA-2002-196-19 the version of xinetd is 2.3.7-4.7

Re: XINETD

2002-12-05 Thread mklinke
December 2002 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > According to RHSA-2002:196-09 the xinetd package should be upgraded to > version 2.3.9 which seems to still have the filedescriptor DOS vuln, but > on RHSA-2002-196-19 the version of xinetd is 2.3.7-4.7, lower than 2.3.

XINETD

2002-12-05 Thread damato
Hi Everyone, According to RHSA-2002:196-09 the xinetd package should be upgraded to version 2.3.9 which seems to still have the filedescriptor DOS vuln, but on RHSA-2002-196-19 the version of xinetd is 2.3.7-4.7, lower than 2.3.9. What's the correct version of xinetd that should be inst

Re: Warnings when installing the xinetd update

2002-12-03 Thread Rick Johnson
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 07:10, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:39:00PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote: > > > > I just ran up2date and got the new xinetd package. However, I got a list > > of warnings (see below), and I don't know what they mean. Does any

Re: Warnings when installing the xinetd update

2002-12-03 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:39:00PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote: > > I just ran up2date and got the new xinetd package. However, I got a list > of warnings (see below), and I don't know what they mean. Does anybody > know? Do I have a problem, or can I just ignore them? The warnings

Warnings when installing the xinetd update

2002-12-03 Thread Rune Berge
I just ran up2date and got the new xinetd package. However, I got a list of warnings (see below), and I don't know what they mean. Does anybody know? Do I have a problem, or can I just ignore them? Here's the output from up2date: Installing... 1:xinetd warning: /et

Re: Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number than the old one?

2002-12-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:31:46 +0100, Bernd Bartmann wrote: > >>Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a > >>smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one > >>from 2002-10

Re: Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number thanthe old one?

2002-12-03 Thread Bernd Bartmann
Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:02:52 +0100, Bernd Bartmann wrote: Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73.i386.rpm)? Do you see any problem

Re: Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number than the old one?

2002-12-03 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:02:52 +0100, Bernd Bartmann wrote: > Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a > smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one > from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73

Latest xinetd errata upgrade with smaller version number than theold one?

2002-12-03 Thread Bernd Bartmann
Anyone else noticed that the new xinetd errata from 2002-12-02 has a smaller version number (xinetd-2.3.7-4.7x.i386.rpm) than the old one from 2002-10-14 (xinetd-2.3.9-0.73.i386.rpm)? -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Bernd Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SoHaNet Technology GmbH / Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee

Re: xinetd logging - disable logging for specific services

2002-11-28 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:17:50AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > It is impossible with syslogd, because there is no facility called > "ipop3". See "man syslog.conf". You could make it log to a less > used facility, e.g. local0.* to local7.*. It would be done by > changing a single line in c-clie

Re: xinetd logging - disable logging for specific services

2002-11-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:57:43 -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > I'm both able and willing to patch it, but I'd prefer to see a patch > that simply moved the logging facility from mail.* to ipop3.*. That > would allow all the logging to still continue, but move

  1   2   3   >