Eduardo, Another fellow had the same question and posted what he found in Bugzilla. There appears to be a problem with the later version so they may have rolled back. See this for more info....
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76146 Regards, Mike Klinke On Thursday 05 December 2002 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > According to RHSA-2002:196-09 the xinetd package should be upgraded to > version 2.3.9 which seems to still have the filedescriptor DOS vuln, but > on RHSA-2002-196-19 the version of xinetd is 2.3.7-4.7, lower than 2.3.9. > What's the correct version of xinetd that should be installed? previous > 2.3.9 or newer 2.3.7? > > Thanks all, > Eduardo -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list