Eduardo,

Another fellow had the same question and posted what he found in Bugzilla. 
There appears to be a problem with the later version so they may have rolled 
back. See this for more info....

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76146

Regards, Mike Klinke



On Thursday 05 December 2002 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> According to RHSA-2002:196-09 the xinetd package should be upgraded to
> version 2.3.9 which seems to still have the filedescriptor DOS vuln, but
> on RHSA-2002-196-19 the version of xinetd is 2.3.7-4.7, lower than 2.3.9.
> What's the correct version of xinetd that should be installed? previous
> 2.3.9 or newer 2.3.7?
>
> Thanks all,
> Eduardo



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to