Ssl certificate expire?
James Williams
Network Systems Engineer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of rbragg
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Problem
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> rbragg wr
Gordon Messmer wrote:
rbragg wrote:
I'm using RH7.3 and apache. My site was running fine for a while, and
all of a sudden, now when I try to go to my https site, openssl fails,
my site is left un-encrypted, and this is in the error log.
Clarify what you mean by "site is left un
rbragg wrote:
I'm using RH7.3 and apache. My site was running fine for a while, and
all of a sudden, now when I try to go to my https site, openssl fails,
my site is left un-encrypted, and this is in the error log.
Clarify what you mean by "site is left un-encrypted". If you teln
Hi,
I'm using RH7.3 and apache. My site was running fine for a while, and
all of a sudden, now when I try to go to my https site, openssl fails,
my site is left un-encrypted, and this is in the error log.
[Fri Oct 10 14:57:28 2003] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (s
Hi,
When I try to go to my https site, it fails and this is in the error log
[Fri Oct 10 14:57:28 2003] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake failed (server
billing.gmnet.net:443, client 192.168.0.201) (OpenSSL library error follows)
[Fri Oct 10 14:57:28 2003] [error] OpenSSL:
error:1408F455:lib(20
lient 192.168.0.201) (OpenSSL library error follows)
[Fri Oct 10 14:57:28 2003] [error] OpenSSL:
error:1408F455:lib(20):func(143):reason(1109)
I have re-installed the openssl package and restarted httpd, and it is
the same...
Thanks
--
Rick Bragg
Green Mountain Network
http://www.gmnet.net
--
r
The new openssl binaries appear to install a new version of ca-bundle.crt.
They happily overwrite the existing file. If you've created your own
certificate authority to self sign crts and added it to the ca-bundle.crt
file...well, it's gone. You'll need to add it again.
--
G
Hi!
I have created a self sign digital certificate which I want to use for
signing my email messages. The problem is that when another person
receive my email it shows that this certificate is not trusted. How do I
make it to be trusted?
Sasa
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EM
At 18:16 9/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I support a large number of windows users, and for the most part the crowd
is either using outlook or eudora for their MUA. No problems with
that. I have succeeded in setting up secure pop and secure imap for the
both of these user groups.
Can you tell us h
RH9. I have done some
> digging, and realize that it's to do with the version of openssl that is
> used in this release of RedHat. What I would like to know is, what's the
> best way to get these to entities to play with each other, in a secure
> way. (I have the auth part se
it's to do with the version of openssl that is
used in this release of RedHat. What I would like to know is, what's the
best way to get these to entities to play with each other, in a secure
way. (I have the auth part setup and eudora is using the CRAM-MD5 method,
but that alone
-2.7.3 and OpenSSL 0.9.6b-32.7
Can anybody help me?
Oliver
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:11:54PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
> I'm running RH 7.2.
>
> I'm trying to manually (via tarballs) install openssh-3.6p1. I've
> already installed openssl-0.9.6j. When I configure openssh with
>
> ./configure \
> --prefix=/
I'm running RH 7.2.
I'm trying to manually (via tarballs) install openssh-3.6p1. I've
already installed openssl-0.9.6j. When I configure openssh with
./configure \
--prefix=/usr/local \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--with-ipv4-default \
--with-ssl-dir
Is there an enviroment variable in which apps like Samba look for the
OpenSSL path? The Red Hat rpm installs OpenSSL in /usr/share/ssl but I
want to get rid of the rpm version, and compile my own installed in
/usr/local/ssl
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Does anyone know if RH is planning to release a fix for the most recent
OpenSSL vulnerability:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030219.txt
?
Regards,
Peter
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 09:18:15 -0500, J D wrote:
> I attempted to upgrade openssl to patch for the slapper worm with the
> rpm openssl-0.9.6b-28.i686.rpm. When I query the package, everything
> seems fine, but if I do 'openssl version&#x
I attempted to upgrade openssl to patch for the slapper worm with the rpm
openssl-0.9.6b-28.i686.rpm. When I query the package, everything seems fine,
but if I do 'openssl version', stdout replies openssl-0.9.6b with no '-28'.
Is this expected?
openssl has encountered some errors. If i like to remove and reinstall it,
can i use the following commands?
step. 1
rpm -e --nodeps openssl
step.2
up2date -u openssl
Will openssl break any deps. Will there be any after effect. Any erros?
regards
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe
ROTECTED]Subject: Updating OpenSSl that was compiled from source
Hi all ,
Thanks for the replies, I just have one more humble request from you guys.
The openssl on my servers was compiled from source, is there any way that I can upgrade my OpenSSL 0.9.5a on RH 6.2 to the latest.
Since "r
ECTED]Subject: Updating OpenSSl that was compiled
from source
Hi all ,
Thanks for the replies, I just have one more humble request from you guys.
The openssl on my servers was compiled from source, is there any way that I
can upgrade my OpenSSL 0.9.5a on RH 6.2 to the latest.
Since &qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-Sep-2002/19:52 -0700, S Peram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for the replies, I just have one more humble request from you
>guys. The openssl on my servers was compiled from source, is there any
>way that I can upgrade my Op
Hi all ,
Thanks for the replies, I just have one more humble request from you guys.
The openssl on my servers was compiled from source, is there any way that I can upgrade my OpenSSL 0.9.5a on RH 6.2 to the latest.
Since "rpm -qa | grep openssl" doesn't show any rpm packag
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Updated Openssl packages from RedHat
Chris,
This question has been answered many times before on this list (but here it
is again)...
<http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-160.html> conta
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Todd, Chris wrote:
> I downloaded and installed the latest Openssl package from RedHat
> (openssl-0.9.6-13.i386.rpm at
> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-160.html) that is supposed to fix the
> bug exploited by the linux.slapper.worm. However, when I click
on that everyone is talking about is the
tarball version from openssl.org.
Here is a list of the latest patched versions from RedHat:
openssl-0.9.6b-28
openssl095a-0.9.5a-18
openssl096-0.9.6-13
openssl-0.9.5a-29
openssl-0.9.6-13
Do a "rpm -qa | grep openssl" and compare your redhat
I downloaded and installed the latest Openssl package from RedHat
(openssl-0.9.6-13.i386.rpm at
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-160.html) that is supposed to fix the
bug exploited by the linux.slapper.worm. However, when I click the link on
that page to go to cve.mitre.org and read a
TECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:19 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Slapper Worm on openssl 0.9.6b(-28)
>From the changelog: (via rpm -q --changelog)
* Thu Aug 01 2002 Nalin Dahyabhai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.6b-28
- update asn patch
ies
Wow!! That gives me a ton of information! That completely puts me at ease
about the openssl exploit and Slapper.worm. Also it seemed lots of people
on this list were questioning if 0.9.6b-28 was really safe or not So I
got it directly from RedHat's mouth (so to speak)
-Origin
On Mié 18 Sep 2002 16:36, Info wrote:
> Martín Marqués wrote:
> > On Mié 18 Sep 2002 16:07, Info wrote:
> >> I am running a redhat 7.2 box with openssl version of
> >> openssl-0.9.6b-28. I found a package openssl-0.9.6c-2.i386 , rawhide
> >> 1.0 for i386
Ed Wilts wrote:
> Why do you *need* a later version? The current version available via
> up2date is fixed against the slapper worm.
>
> Please note that every release of openssl has incompabilities with
> previous versions, so unless you really know what you're doing,
> g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Nick White posted the following:
NW>That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
NW>anywhere about the worm on their web site.
I dunno why but this satisfied my curiosity:
http://www.redhat.com/support
"rpm -q --changelog openssl | grep ASN" can tell you the same thing...
without the tech support .
Trevor.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick White
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:08:35PM -0500, Furnish, Trever G wrote:
> If you're not using ssl in apache, you can also just carve all of the ssl
> stuff out of the apache config and restart apache. Doesn't patch openssl,
> but at least you wouldn't get slapper.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:36:29AM +0800, Info wrote:
> Martín Marqués wrote:
> > On Mié 18 Sep 2002 16:07, Info wrote:
> >> I am running a redhat 7.2 box with openssl version of
> >> openssl-0.9.6b-28. I found a package openssl-0.9.6c-2.i386 , rawhide
> >>
Furnish, Trever G wrote:
> If you're not using ssl in apache, you can also just carve all of the
> ssl stuff out of the apache config and restart apache. Doesn't patch
> openssl, but at least you wouldn't get slapper.
I am patching ssl for qmail with is running STARTTL
That's exactly why I contacted RedHat... They don't have information
anywhere about the worm on their web site. I received a response back from
a higher level tech support person at RedHat confirming that the up2date
openssl package 0.9.6b-28 is safe. (see RedHat's response b
If you're not using ssl in apache, you can also just carve all of the ssl
stuff out of the apache config and restart apache. Doesn't patch openssl,
but at least you wouldn't get slapper.
Someone *please* correct me if I'm wrong. :-)
> -Original Message-
>
Martín Marqués wrote:
> On Mié 18 Sep 2002 16:07, Info wrote:
>> I am running a redhat 7.2 box with openssl version of
>> openssl-0.9.6b-28. I found a package openssl-0.9.6c-2.i386 , rawhide
>> 1.0 for i386. Can i download and and upgrade the present package
>> wi
ed by the linux.slapper.worm was fixed in [errata
RHSA-2002-160 | openssl RPM package 0.9.6b-28]" or something very similar.
While it's possible for users to read and understand the implications of
RHSA-2002-160, a major incident like this should be specifically addressed
by a Red
On Mié 18 Sep 2002 16:07, Info wrote:
> I am running a redhat 7.2 box with openssl version of openssl-0.9.6b-28. I
> found a package openssl-0.9.6c-2.i386 , rawhide 1.0 for i386. Can i
> download and and upgrade the present package with the rpm -Uvh packagename
> command? Will it br
I am running a redhat 7.2 box with openssl version of openssl-0.9.6b-28. I
found a package openssl-0.9.6c-2.i386 , rawhide 1.0 for i386. Can i download and
and upgrade the present package with the rpm -Uvh packagename command? Will it
break the deps?
thanks
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 01:14:19PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
: Specifically 0.9.6b-28. Earlier 0.9.6b packages (ie; 0.9.6b-24 and
: 0.9.6b-8) may not have the fix for this vulnerability.
:
: I really wish RH would make some kind of explicit announcement about this.
You mean, like this:
ht
On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 13:14, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> I really wish RH would make some kind of explicit announcement about this.
They've done.
http://www.redhat.com/support/alerts/linux_slapper_worm.html
--
Saul Arias - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-Sep-2002/07:42 -0700, Nick White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
>package 0.9.6b is safe.
[snip]
Specifically 0.9.6b-28. Earlier 0.9.6b packages (ie; 0.9.6b-24 and
0.9.6b-8) ma
I've called RedHat about the "Slapper" worm and it appears that the RHN
package 0.9.6b is safe. Below is a response from their support.
__
Description of your problem:
using openssl 0.9.6b from the Red Hat Network. Is this vulnerable from th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Sep-2002/15:38 -0600, Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This question has been answered many times before (but here it is again)...
[snip]
Yes, the vulnerability used by the slapper worm was fixed in errata
RHSA-2002-160, but it would have bee
ryone is talking about is the
tarball version from openssl.org.
Here is a list of the latest patched versions from RedHat:
openssl-0.9.6b-28
openssl095a-0.9.5a-18
openssl096-0.9.6-13
openssl-0.9.5a-29
openssl-0.9.6-13
Do a "rpm -qa | grep openssl" and compare your redhat package versio
I am running Red-Hat/Linux 7.2 with Apache/1.3.22, mod_ssl/2.8.7. To
fix the Apache/mod_ssl worm
(http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-27.html). I installed:
openssl-0.9.6b-24.i386.rpm as suggested at:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-155.html. So I now need to
upgrade my Apache
Yes, I think it will.
if you are afraid of the dependencies - use apt-rpm.
http://apt-rpm.tux-family.org
- Original Message -
From:
Info
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 1:34
AM
Subject: Re: Openssl
I couldnt find any redhat or rawhide
AM
Subject: Re: Openssl
a lot of ways:
1. up2date (if you can)
2. download the newest openssl (for 7.3) from ftp.redhat.com ... ...
3. www.freshrpms.net
- Original Message -
From:
Info
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
a lot of ways:
1. up2date (if you can)
2. download the newest openssl (for 7.3) from ftp.redhat.com ... ...
3. www.freshrpms.net
- Original Message -
From:
Info
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 12:35
AM
Subject
I am running a Redhat 7.2 box. It is currently
running openssl-0.9.6b-28. How do i upgrade openssl to a 0.9c
version?
regards
I expected to find unsatisfied dependencies, rather than missing files,
but that doesn't seem to be the case with your install.
> > Since openssl-0.9.5 doesn't /provide/ libssl.so.1, it looks sorta like
> > you took a shortcut at some point, and symlinked libssl.so.1 to
> >
em after updating with up2date, post
> the output of:
>
> rpm -q glibc apache mod_ssl openssl openssl095a php
>
> Should be something like:
> glibc-2.2.4-18.7.0.6
> apache-1.3.22-5.7.1
> mod_ssl-2.8.5-5
> openssl-0.9.6-13
> openssl095a-0.9.5a-18
> php-4.0.6-13
It
t comment regarding the problem. However,
if it is still a problem after updating with up2date, post the output
of:
rpm -q glibc apache mod_ssl openssl openssl095a php
Should be something like:
glibc-2.2.4-18.7.0.6
apache-1.3.22-5.7.1
mod_ssl-2.8.5-5
openssl-0.9.6-13
openssl095a-0.9.5a-18
ph
I discovered that openssl-0.9.6.9 appears not to have undefined
references. That came out two security updates ago, however.
Has anyone else observed the "OpenSSLDie" problem with the
latest openssl security updates (10 and 14) or do I just have some
quirk in my installation??
: undefined symbol: OpenSSLDie
If I comment out the php4 lines in httpd.conf, the problem shows up
with a similar message trying to load /usr/lib/libssl.so.1.
I downgraded to openssl-0.9.5-10 and mod_ssl-2.8.5-3 with no
success. I am running apache-1.3.22-5.7.1 on the 2.2.19-7.0.16
kernel. I then
Does anyone know whether openssl 0.9.7 defaults to 512 or 1024 bits when you create a
certification request?
Much appreciated
Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at
http://www.eudoramail.com
___
Redhat
thanks for all the concerns, guys! :-)
- Original Message -
From: "David Talkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: openssh/openssl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trond Eivind Glom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>"Maynard B. Fernando" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> [root@ns3 /root]# cd /usr/local/src/
>> [root@ns3 src]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm
>> error: glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
>> [root@ns3
"Maynard B. Fernando" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> here's the result sir :-)
>
> [root@ns3 /root]# cd /usr/local/src/
> [root@ns3 src]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm
> error: glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
> [root@ns3 src]#
1) Is this a valid rpm? "rpm -K "
2) You _don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 04 February 2002 06:41 am, Maynard B. Fernando wrote:
> here's the result sir :-)
>
> [root@ns3 /root]# cd /usr/local/src/
> [root@ns3 src]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm
> error: glibc-2.2.1-3.2.4.i386.rpm cannot be installed
> [root@
/os/i386/
ncftp ...updates/6.2/en/os/i386 > ls openssl*
openssl-0.9.5a-7.6.x.i386.rpm openssl-perl-0.9.5a-7.6.x.i386.rpm
openssl-devel-0.9.5a-7.6.x.i386.rpmopenssl-python-0.9.5a-7.6.x.i386.rpm
Emmanuel
___
Redhat-list
t: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: openssh/openssl
> sir,
>
> i downloaded it from rpmfind.net or will you guide me
> where i could get those updates for 6.2? :-)
>
> if i can't get any positive result, i'll upgrade it to 7.2
> to finish all my trou
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: openssh/openssl
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 04 February 2002 05:53 am, Maynard B. Fernando wrote:
> > to all,
> >
> > im running redhat 6.2 and trying to update my o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 04 February 2002 05:53 am, Maynard B. Fernando wrote:
> to all,
>
> im running redhat 6.2 and trying to update my openssh/openssl
> but i got this error: unexpected query source
>
> im using this command, $ rpm -Uph (name
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:53:30PM +0800, Maynard B. Fernando wrote:
>
> im running redhat 6.2 and trying to update my openssh/openssl
> but i got this error: unexpected query source
> what seems to be the problem of mine? will you please help me guys? :-)
Where did you get the rpm
to all,
im running redhat 6.2 and trying to update my openssh/openssl
but i got this error: unexpected query source
im using this command, $ rpm -Uph (name of the .rpm)
what seems to be the problem of mine? will you please help me guys? :-)
thanks in advance . . .
Maynard B. Fernando
Tel
Alessandro,
This should tell you everything you need to
know.http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/SSL-Certificates-HOWTO/
Hope this helps,
Kevin
>From: Alessandro Coppelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: OPENSSL and CERTIFIC
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
>I have to do the certificate for ipop3, imap, http
>and I looking for in mailinglist.
>I find some mail but I want to learn the philosopy
>of certificate :
See the following documents:
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/sec
Hi to all.
Sorry for my bad english.
I have to do the certificate for ipop3, imap, http
and I looking for in mailinglist.
I find some mail but I want to learn the philosopy
of certificate :
what is *.key ,
what is *.csr ,
what is *.crt,
what is *.pem
and whic
; libcrypto.so.0.9.5a
libssl.so.0 -> libssl.so.0.9.5a
I also noted that libcrypto.so.0.9.6 already exists on
my system:
libcrypto.so.1 -> libcrypto.so.0.9.6 )
I'm eager to understand what's going on here. Is the
root of the problem here just that openssl-0.9.6
should have upd
Quoting Bill Fortesting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am attempting to upgrade openssl-0.9.5a ->
> openssl-0.9.6 on RedHat 7. gnorpm warns about
> dependencies for libcrypto.so.0 and libssl.so.0.
> I searched these groups and found a suggestion that
> 0.9.6 is not backwards
Install both files at the same time:
rpm -Uvh openssl095a-0.9.5a-9.i386.rpm openssl-0.9.6-9.i386.rpm
See http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2001-051.html
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 08:29, Bill Fortesting wrote:
> I am attempting to upgrade openssl-0.9.5a ->
> openssl-0.9.6 on
I am attempting to upgrade openssl-0.9.5a ->
openssl-0.9.6 on RedHat 7. gnorpm warns about
dependencies for libcrypto.so.0 and libssl.so.0.
I searched these groups and found a suggestion that
0.9.6 is not backwards compatible and provides
openssl095a-0.9.5a-9 as an "upgrade package tha
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:07:49PM -0500, Jim Lambert wrote:
>
> Huh? I've run up2date and I think, I've got the latest versions of these
> packages. Is there some other package I should be installing?
If openssl is installed, just type `openssl req` to create
a X.509 certi
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Jim Lambert wrote:
> These tools aren't in any of these pkgs:
>
> openssl-devel-0.9.6-9
> openssl-0.9.6-9
> openssl095a-0.9.5a-9
> openssl-perl-0.9.6-9
Yes, they are. Like I said earlier: They're in 'openssl':
openssl req
openssl gen
ert wrote:
>>
>> These tools aren't in any of these pkgs:
>>
>> openssl-devel-0.9.6-9
>> openssl-0.9.6-9
>> openssl095a-0.9.5a-9
>> openssl-perl-0.9.6-9
>
> They're in the updates to your distribution.
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
&g
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 02:27:08PM -0500, Jim Lambert wrote:
>
> These tools aren't in any of these pkgs:
>
> openssl-devel-0.9.6-9
> openssl-0.9.6-9
> openssl095a-0.9.5a-9
> openssl-perl-0.9.6-9
They're in the updates
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Jim Lambert wrote:
> The man pages are in the openssl-0.9.6-9 rpm, but the tools are
> missing.
They're in 'openssl':
openssl req
openssl gendsa
openssl genrsa
--
If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have,
I'd have one d
The man pages are in the openssl-0.9.6-9 rpm, but the tools are
missing.
Thanks,
-Jim
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Replace Z's with E's to reply)
Linux: The Choice of the GNU Generation
-Anonymous
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
I'm trying to install Cyrus in my RH7 (2.2.16-22) box
When I do:
rpm -Uvh cyrus-imapd-2.0.9-3.i386.rpm
I get:
error: failed dependencies:
libcrypto.so.1 is needed by cyrus-imapd-2.0.9-3
libssl.so.1 is needed by cyrus-imapd-2.0.9-3
I have openssl-0.9.5a-14 installed,
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:
> Dear List
>
> I messed up my openssl file (RH 7.0 rpm) last night when I tried to get
> openSSH and mod_ssl working as I had a problem with debugging openssh
> saying it could not connect to port 22.
>
> No I get an error re
Dear List
I messed up my openssl file (RH 7.0 rpm) last night when I tried to get
openSSH and mod_ssl working as I had a problem with debugging openssh
saying it could not connect to port 22.
No I get an error referring to "Name" and x509 and I had to remove all
this stuff on my Apa
Hi there.
When I try to install openssl-0.9.5a-1.i386.rpm I get the following message:
file /usr/man/man1/passwd.1 from install of openssl-0.9.5a-1 conflicts with
file from package passwd-0.63-1
Do I have to remove the man file or do I have to uninstall passwd rpm or do
I have to
on 14/3/2000 9:49 AM, Matt Beland shot down the bitstream:
> Here's a link to an FTP site with all the necessary libraries in RPM format.
> Works quite well. They're Mandrake packages, but they work under RedHat. The
> only possible problem is that these packages are optimized for Pentium or
> be
#x27;ll have to find another
package source.
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake-crypto/RPMS/
There are four "openssh-*" packages; you need all four. You also need the
two "openssl-*" packages. Install the openssl packages first; it doesn't
matter which one goes f
I am trying to install openSSL so that I can install openSSH, but am rather
confused. I guess I don't understand what the different modes of encryption
and what libraries it needs to install or compile correctly.
I am going to be using it at home and possibly an educational institution
Hello All,
I'm a bumbler in the world of Linux thus far. I'm trying to install, OpenSSL, for
OpenSSH,
etc. I get a bunch of error messages when I do the make install. under the
crypto/objects directory I get a long list of undeclared variables.
Any ideas? perhaps my RPM had
"Robert D. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Feb 2000, Gate wrote:
>> Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
>> around and can't seem to find any.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bryan
>
>Yo
Hey Everyone
Thanks for all the info! I was in fact able to find the RPMs I needed.
The only problem is I get this error when trying to create a certificate:
Using configuration from /var/ssl//etc/openssl.cnf
Unable to load config info
It looks as though it just cannot find the config file (/e
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Gate wrote:
> Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
> around and can't seem to find any.
ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/security
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
sta
ftp.modssl.org/contrib/openssl-0.9.4-1.i386.rpm
ftp.modssl.org/contrib/openssl-devel-0.9.4-1.i386.rpm
- Original Message -
From: Gate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 02:58
Subject: OpenSSL RPMS
> Anyone know where I can so
gt; Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
> around and can't seem to find any.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2000, Gate wrote:
> Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
> around and can't seem to find any.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
You have to go to Germany ;-)
ftp.redhat.de
--
Robert Williams[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jarob Consul
Anyone know where I can some OpenSSL RPMs for Redhat 6.1? Been looking
around and can't seem to find any.
Thanks,
Bryan
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Thanks:
This did the trick :)
- Mike
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> "Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
> > Anyone know where I can pick up the source rpm for openssl-0.9.4? I went
> > to ftp2.replay.com, but they only have the source for 0.9.3.
>
>
"Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
> Anyone know where I can pick up the source rpm for openssl-0.9.4? I went
> to ftp2.replay.com, but they only have the source for 0.9.3.
ftp://duke.eburg.com/pub/linux/redhat-6.x-mycontrib/
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with &quo
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
