On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 14:29, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> After running that command it looks like there is something wrong with
> my rpm command:
>
> + echo I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
> I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
> + GCC=gcc
> + '[' -f /etc/redh
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> After running that command it looks like there is something wrong with
> my rpm command:
>
> + echo I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
> I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
> + GCC=gcc
> + '[' -f /etc/redhat-rele
After running that command it looks like there is something wrong with my
rpm command:
+ echo I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
+ GCC=gcc
+ '[' -f /etc/redhat-release ']'
+ fgrep -q ' 6.' /etc/redhat-release
+ rpm -q b
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
> I think you are running on RedHat Linux or SuSE Linux.
> [1]+ Stopped ./install.sh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailScanner-4.12-2]#
> -
>
> Any ideas why it is doing this, or how can I get past this? I have
> tried un-ta
Hi Guys,
I was trying to install MailScanner on a Redhat 8.0 box but quit by
using Ctrl^x to install another package before installing MailScanner.
However, now when I try to run the ./install.sh script it hangs at with
the following messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] MailScanner-4.12-2]# ./install.s
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 01:54 pm, Vincent Cocco wrote:
> Linuxers:
>
> Anyone on this list successfully downloaded and installed Oracle 9i
> from the Oracle website?
>
> I opted to install from my hard drive and have created my mount points,
> u01 and u02, respectively.
> I'm getting the follo
Linuxers:
Anyone on this list successfully downloaded and installed Oracle 9i from the Oracle website?
I opted to install from my hard drive and have created my mount points, u01 and u02, respectively.
I'm getting the following message when I try to run
the Universal Installer from /mnt/cdrom/:
Hi folks,
If, like me, you have been having installation hangs with your Linux distro
(various flavours) and you have a weird (ie. more than one CD-ROM / CD-RW)
hardware setup, then I may just have the answer. (If this has been posted
before, or is old news, I'm sorry, but I have been banging my h
I have system commander which I can use after the install. It's just
that I have been using lilo till now, and havn't used sc due to lilo
doing the job o.k. SC would pick up both operating systems no probs I
reckon. So I will see how it goes, and cross my fingers.
Thanks for the help.
regards G
greg wrote:
I installed it into the boot partition. Will this be o.k? I can't even
boot into windows at the moment, so when I re-install, I will have to
boot from the CD, and bypass lilo. When windows is re-installed, will
it just boot straight into windows, or will lilo come up again. Also,
I installed it into the boot partition. Will this be o.k? I can't even
boot into windows at the moment, so when I re-install, I will have to
boot from the CD, and bypass lilo. When windows is re-installed, will
it just boot straight into windows, or will lilo come up again. Also,
will lilo inte
Greg wrote:
I need to re-install windows. What effect is this going to have to
lilo, and what do I need to do to ensure a problem free install, with a
fully working linux system still available?
regards Greg
It depends on whether you installed lilo in the mbr or in the first
sector of
b
I need to re-install windows. What effect is this going to have to
lilo, and what do I need to do to ensure a problem free install, with a
fully working linux system still available?
regards Greg
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://li
Great products, just
install there Open Management products. It might save you 9 days.
Regards.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Monical [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Advanced Server - Oracle 9i install issues
Looks
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Robert Monical wrote:
> Looks like this is a not a "certified" configuration
>
> Here is what Orale sez about 7.1 I have not tried this install yet
>
> APPENDIX A - Solutions for the relinking problem seen with Oracle 9.0.1 on
> Red Hat 7.1. Option 1: (remove
n time we'll try you suggestion.
I'll keep the mailing-list posted.
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Robert Monical [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Advanced Server - Oracle 9i install issues
Sorry about the las
Sorry about the last.
Looks like this is a not a "certified" configuration
Here is what Orale sez about 7.1 I have not tried this install yet
APPENDIX A - Solutions for the relinking problem seen with Oracle 9.0.1 on
Red Hat 7.1.
Option 1: (remove "-z defs" from genclntsh file) (W
Looks like this is a not a "certified" configuration
Here is what Orale sez about 7.1 I have not tried this install yet
APPENDIX A - Solutions for the relinking problem seen with Oracle 9.0.1 on
Red Hat 7.1. Option 1: (remove "-z defs" from genclntsh file) (Workaround)
1. When you
Title: Message
Has anyone had any
issues with installing Oracle 9i on an Advanced Server?
We currently have
RH-AS 2.1 loaded on a Dell 6650 with 12 GB of mem. and 4 X 1.6 GB
Xeons.
Oracle 9.0.1 R2
stalls on Linking. It gets as far as 61% then begins to eat up cpu time and
hangs the box.
W
This is now the second time I've re-installed RH7.3 from scratch on this
server and it's driving me bonkers. It has three drives in it which are set to
be / (40GB), /var (2GB), and /home (60GB). Everything runs fine, I configure
the drives the way I need them (the first time I installed RH,
>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, daniel wrote:
> i'm trying to install skipjack (or any release for that matter) onto an old
> 486 that doesn't allow booting off the cd. so i made a linux startup disk
> and it seems to work... but only for so long. after i get the start up
> screen and the prompt:
>
> bo
At 4/12/2002 11:31 AM -0700, you wrote:
>it's 100mhz (didn't know 486's came that high
486DX4/100. 100MHz CPU, 3x multiplier, system bus at 33MHz.
>and it's got 32mb ram
Good enough.
>but looking at the board
>it looks like it's been upgraded
>and there's two kinds of ram slots
>4 30-pin slots
What are you trying to do? I loaded a very old version of slackware
on to a 486 with only 4MB of ram to basically use as a dumb terminal
about a year ago. There were special instructions on how to do a low
memory install. If you are trying for this I'll see if I can find my
notes on how I did it
. g. quinn
starving programmer
- Original Message -
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: install issues
> At 4/11/2002 11:56 PM -0700, you wrote:
> >i'm trying to install skipjac
At 4/11/2002 11:56 PM -0700, you wrote:
>i'm trying to install skipjack (or any release for that matter) onto an old
>486 that doesn't allow booting off the cd. so i made a linux startup disk
>and it seems to work... but only for so long. after i get the start up
>screen and the prompt:
How muc
Bret Hughes wrote:
> In my experience sig 11s are usually hardware (memory) related. Bad
> memory or perhaps not enough memory for the install are too thingsI
> would check. Not sure what the low memory deal will do. I hope it
> would tell you you don't have enough memory but I don't know.
In
On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 01:56, daniel wrote:
> i'm trying to install skipjack (or any release for that matter) onto an old
> 486 that doesn't allow booting off the cd. so i made a linux startup disk
> and it seems to work... but only for so long. after i get the start up
> screen and the prompt:
>
i'm trying to install skipjack (or any release for that matter) onto an old
486 that doesn't allow booting off the cd. so i made a linux startup disk
and it seems to work... but only for so long. after i get the start up
screen and the prompt:
boot:
and i hit it seems to go through the start
Newer versions of lilo support booting off a partion > 1024 cylinders. Hi
sbest bet would be to boot off a linux boot disk (you did make a boot
disk right?), and upgrade lilo, then run lilo.
But as Sam says, make sure it is setup to install on the mbr. using the
-v switch on lilo can help verify
Johnathan Smith wrote:
>
> I am setting on a new computer with on 20GB hard
> drive. I used the first 10GB for windows ME and now I
> am trying to use the other 10GB for redhat 7.0.
>
> I install redhat and I dont get any errors but after
> reboot the computer. the computer goes right into
> win
ME, it does for NT)
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Johnathan Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Install Issues
I am setting on a new computer with on 20GB hard
drive. I used the first 10GB for windows ME and now
I am setting on a new computer with on 20GB hard
drive. I used the first 10GB for windows ME and now I
am trying to use the other 10GB for redhat 7.0.
I install redhat and I dont get any errors but after
reboot the computer. the computer goes right into
windowsME. If I use the book disk that lin
32 matches
Mail list logo
