yes RH7.2 has xinetd.
But you can install inetd as an individual package though.
Either way, you can run any service from xinetd if you can run it through inetd.
Just a little bit of man xinetd and all will help you out.
xinet'd howto is also good on linux docs.
Regards,
-
Muh
ar or from your own machine??
>
>
> At 09:41 AM 5/16/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >It does.
> >
> >Take a look at /etc/xinetd.d...there are a number of files there for
> >specific services.
> >
> >If the one you want is there, you can edit its file, and
quot; and then "service xinetd reload".
>
>On Mon, 13 May 2002, Devon Harding - GTHLA wrote:
>
> > How can I start an inetd service in RedHat 7.2? It was under my impression
> > that RH 7.2 uses xinet
ng - GTHLA wrote:
> How can I start an inetd service in RedHat 7.2? It was under my impression
> that RH 7.2 uses xinetd.
>
> _
> Devon Harding
> System Administrator
> Gilat Latin America
> 954-858-1600
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
How can I start an inetd service in RedHat 7.2? It was under my impression
that RH 7.2 uses xinetd.
_
Devon Harding
System Administrator
Gilat Latin America
954-858-1600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
to run them both at once. Normally I would expect only
one. Certainly my RH7 boxes are only running xinetd and my 6.x boxes are
only running inetd. I'd suggest you turn inetd off and see if anything
breaks.
--
Who is this General Failure, and why is he
Right, only xinetd should be running.
Michael George wrote:
> After my upgrade to 7.0, I have both of these daemons running. Is that
> correnct? I seems to me that only one should be operating...
>
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
After my upgrade to 7.0, I have both of these daemons running. Is that
correnct? I seems to me that only one should be operating...
--
No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government, is not to trust it
all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly
the
have all the
> > updated installed. Inetd.conf shows the line for telnet and it runs
> > in.telnetd with no parameters. Here's the output in /var/log/messages:
> >
> > Apr 4 22:49:43 hostname inetd[489]: pid 11886: exit status 1
> >
> > Any ideas what co
out and telnet is
> exited. The PID is the in.telnetd for that user and I have all the
> updated installed. Inetd.conf shows the line for telnet and it runs
> in.telnetd with no parameters. Here's the output in /var/log/messages:
>
> Apr 4 22:49:43 hostname inetd[489]: pid 11886
22:49:43 hostname inetd[489]: pid 11886: exit status 1
Any ideas what could cause this?
thanks..
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Statux wrote:
> Is the telnet session cut off at this time? exit status 1 is the
> general-use error code for exiting proggies.
>
> inetd isn't exiting tho,
Is the telnet session cut off at this time? exit status 1 is the
general-use error code for exiting proggies.
inetd isn't exiting tho, it's just whatever was pid 10209. Ya need to find
that out :)
Perhaps you need to check your /etc/inetd.conf for errors, and check to
see if the
I noticed that whenever I telnet to my server, I get this in my log file,
I am running RH 6.2 with updates. Any idea what could be wrong?
hostname inetd[489]: pid 10209: exit status 1
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Then all my PCs are root-kit'ed. 'Cause it happened regularly to me
until I rpm -e'd linuxconf.
I haven't studied the source code of linuxconf, but when I run it
*something* put back linuxconf in my inetd.conf files. Which, BTW, was
the major reason why I stopped using linuxconf.
Best regards
Gu
> Now, as for the best way to disable linuxconfig, many on the list wil
> tell you to run "rpm -e linuxconf". That is the way I preferre to do
> it, but you can do it the way you have discribed as well. One thing to
> be aware of, unless you go into linuxconf and disable web access, it
> will pu
This could be any number of things. I know I see these kinds of messages
when certain Windows telnet clients log off. Of course, I also saw these
error messages back before I updated to the latest inetd in up2date.
You might also double check the max number of instances in inetd.conf. I
have a
Hi again,
I have the following lines in /var/log/messages
inetd[26154] : pid 31019 : exit status 1
inetd[26154] : pid 31020 : exit status 1
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat
I have several servers running RedHat 6.1 - they are primarily
used for mail and also act as an Internet gateway.
There seems to be an occasional slowdown in all services started by
inetd - ipop3d, telnet, ftp . ipop3d is the largest problem - for
a mailbox with 1 or 2 short messages - may take
o act as an Internet gateway.
>
> There seems to be an occasional slowdown in all services started by
> inetd - ipop3d, telnet, ftp . ipop3d is the largest problem - for
> a mailbox with 1 or 2 short messages - may take 60-120 seconds to
> retrieve. Happens with different mail clients.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Gary S. Ingram wrote:
> I have several servers running RedHat 6.1 - they are primarily
> used for mail and also act as an Internet gateway.
>
> There seems to be an occasional slowdown in all services started by
> inetd - ipop3d, telnet, ftp . ipop3d is the
I have several servers running RedHat 6.1 - they are primarily
used for mail and also act as an Internet gateway.
There seems to be an occasional slowdown in all services started by
inetd - ipop3d, telnet, ftp . ipop3d is the largest problem - for
a mailbox with 1 or 2 short messages - may take
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Jacobberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 9:13 PM
Subject: inetd and RH7
> I still like to irc chat. Unfortuneately since last week I can't gain
> access
> to my fav
>
> I have a DSL account with a static IP in the router and my ip as
> set up on my cisco router is 10.0.0.1 with my wan0-0 set to a
> static ip address. Help me figure this out.
You probably need to enable it on the router would be my guess, since
that is probably the address that the server is
:05 -0600
> From: Frank Jacobberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: inetd and RH7
>
> I still like to irc chat. Unfortuneately since last week I can't gain
> access
> to my favorite irc server. Kick me out with a
dentd -e -o
514 ?S 0:00 identd -e -o
515 ?S 0:00 identd -e -o
516 ?S 0:00 identd -e -o
517 ?S 0:00 identd -e -o
If I do a ps ax | grep on inetd I get:
561 ?S 0:00 xinetd -reuse -pidfile /var/run/xinet.pid
So how would I go about diagnosing the
o be missing from my installation?
btw - Jason, your explanation was well rec'd thanks to you as well.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 4:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: inetd vs. xinetd
Net net,
for that service? could you give me an RPM that would send a config file
>into this directory so i could get a feel for this process?
>
>thanks.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:15 PM
>To: [
directory so i could get a feel for this process?
>
> thanks.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: inetd vs. xinetd
>
>
> Not a heck of a lot, to
urger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: inetd vs. xinetd
>
>
> Not a heck of a lot, to tell the truth. If you do "ps ax | grep xinetd",
> you should see that it's running.
>
> I
s?
thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 1:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: inetd vs. xinetd
Not a heck of a lot, to tell the truth. If you do "ps ax | grep xinetd",
you should see that it's runni
Not a heck of a lot, to tell the truth. If you do "ps ax | grep xinetd",
you should see that it's running.
If you want specific daemons to run from xinetd, as they might have from
inetd, you can usually find them as RPMs already precompiled for RH7,
which will go and instal
I have read from this list the change that has been done re: this file. i
have installed the default server for RedHat 7.0 and can only find the
directory /etc/xinetd.d, and the only entry within this directory is a file
named 'linuxconf-web'.
after reading 'A Guide to the Inet Daemon' by Eri
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
> But to answer you question directly, edit
>
> /etc/xinetd.d/imap
>
> and comment out/remove the line
>
> disable = yes
You can also use "ntsysv", which will list all of your xinetd services and
let you enable/disable them.
MSG
On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Dave Lewis wrote:
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in my new RH 7
> install ???
>
> Where did it go or did I not install something ??? thought that was a
> default part . ??
>
> need it to enable imap :)
>
RH 7 now u
Others have told you it's xinted now, and yes you shoudl read up on it.
But to answer you question directly, edit
/etc/xinetd.d/imap
and comment out/remove the line
disable = yes
hth
charles
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Dave Lewis wrote:
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Dave Lewis wrote:
According to the release notes inetd has been replaced by xinetd.
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in my new RH 7
> install ???
>
> Where did it go or did I not install something ??? thought that was a
> default
Dave Lewis wrote:
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in my new RH 7
> install ???
>
> Where did it go or did I not install something ??? thought that was a
> default part . ??
>
> need it to enable imap
Its now xinetd.conf powered by xinetd the scripts are located in
xinetd.d . Its alot different, but so far seems better, with better
options. Im still reading about it myself.
Kirk
>On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Dave Lewis wrote:
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 03:51:52PM -0400, Dave Lewis wrote:
> I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in my new RH 7
> install ???
>
> Where did it go or did I not install something ??? thought that was a
> default part . ??
>
> need it to enable imap
I don't seem to have a inetd ?? or an inetd.conf file in my new RH 7
install ???
Where did it go or did I not install something ??? thought that was a
default part . ??
need it to enable imap :)
Dave
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[
parameter of inetd. Please help. Thanks.
My system is Redhat 6.2 with kernel 2.2.16-3, sendmail-8.9.3-20 and inetd
inetd-0.16-4.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Make sure either a) the incoming host's IP address is resolvable
(i.e., DNS knows about it), or b) you have an entry for it in
/etc/hosts. Then add a line to /etc/hosts.allow that says:
in.ftpd :
See if that works. -d
--
David Talkington
Community Networking Initiative
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
244
I am having a problem with my ftpd... when I try to connect to it it
connectes then disconnects saying nothing...
is there an ftpd log some place I can look at to see if I have it configured
wrong?
any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated
Thanx
Steve
--
To unsubscribe: mail [
I am trying to start nmbd from inetd as I have done on RH 6.1 w/o problems.
I am trying to get this working on a RH 6.2 box. Samba works fine when
started manually, but for some reason inetd cannot spawn the process. I have
added the correct entries to /etc/services, and /etc/inetd.conf
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>At 11:31 AM 4/13/00 -0500, you wrote:
>>I'm getting the following error message every ten minutes in
>>/var/log/messages:
>>
>>Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>>
>
> Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>
> Any thoughts as to what to where to look and how to fix it?
Doesn't that mean there are two machines on your LAN with the same IP
address?
--
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Computer Services Pty
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 11:31:15AM -0500, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> I'm getting the following error message every ten minutes in
> /var/log/messages:
>
> Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>
> Any thoughts as to what to where to
Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>
> Any thoughts as to what to where to look and how to fix it?
Comment out the "auth" line in /etc/inetd.conf, and restart inetd.
"identd" now runs as its own se
At 11:31 AM 4/13/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm getting the following error message every ten minutes in
>/var/log/messages:
>
>Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
>
>Any thoughts as to what to where to look and how to fix it?
>
>Glen
I'm getting the following error message every ten minutes in
/var/log/messages:
Apr 13 11:27:01 mpls inetd[19909]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use
Any thoughts as to what to where to look and how to fix it?
Glen
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscri
This just recently started occurring, Could someone explain what the Sig1
and Sig13 are.
Mar 16 08:35:42 belial inetd[388]: pid 14323: exit status 1
Mar 16 08:40:20 belial inetd[388]: pid 14332: exit status 1
Mar 16 08:43:50 belial inetd[388]: pid 14334: exit signal 13
Mar 16 08:46:29 belial
Gustav Schaffter wrote:
> I have later learnt that it might be smarter to REJECT calls to auth
> than DENY'ing them. Should reduce number of retries and thereby shorten
> any timeouts.
Not really. As I was beginning to see earlier, when I wrote to the list
regarding firewalls, REJECT is identica
Charles Galpin wrote:
> 1. Like Gustav, I would like to know which is better
I don't know. I don't get a high enough volume of auth requests on my
mail servers to really care whether it's standalone or inetd.
> 2. I did not have identd selected in ntsysv, and am quite sur
7;re having a very high volume of calls for auth, the
> performance penalty is not high enough to get worried about.
>
> Best regards
> Gustav
>
> Bret Hughes wrote:
> >
> > I too have been wondering about this.
> >
> > Seems like it would be a tad faster to
this.
>
> Seems like it would be a tad faster to have it running standalone. It
> will also use some resources all the time as opposed to inetd starting
> it, sending it the query and letting it shut down. At least if my
> understanding of inetd is correct. I don't know
I too have been wondering about this.
Seems like it would be a tad faster to have it running standalone. It
will also use some resources all the time as opposed to inetd starting
it, sending it the query and letting it shut down. At least if my
understanding of inetd is correct. I don't
m thinking linuxconf is
trying to do it. If this is true, then maybe the simplest route is to run
it standalone and remove from inetd.conf. Anyone?
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> > Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already
Gordon,
What is the dis/advantages of running auth standalone or through inetd.
(I was lurking in to this one since I obviously have made the same
configuration error. (Doh.) Now trying to decide which one to keep. :-)
Best regards
Gustav
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Charles Galpin
Charles Galpin wrote:
> Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
> Mar 13 22:59:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
>
> I have named setup to run at boot time in ntsysv.
hehehe... The "bind" in th
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:04:13PM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> I know I've seen this one before, but can't find it in the archives
>
> I get these every ten minutes in the logs:
>
> Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
> use
&g
I know I've seen this one before, but can't find it in the archives
I get these every ten minutes in the logs:
Mar 13 22:49:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
use
Mar 13 22:59:24 server inetd[10663]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in
use
I have named setup
Hi,
I have upgraded to the latest lpd from priority.redhat.com and I
still unable to print from anywhere.
Telnetting to localhost 515 gives me "connection refused" and logs the
subject of this message to /var/log/messages.
Before the upgrade I was getting "malformed from address".
I can
l it like this:
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/inetd stop
> rpm -Uhv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/yourarch/netkit-base-0.10-37.yourarch.rpm
>
> Then, start inetd:
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/inetd start
>
> Let me know if the problem persists. Also, your /etc/inetd.conf file might
> have been backed
Try the new netkit package that is in rawhide right now:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS/netkit-base-0.10-37.src.rpm
Rebuild it like this:
rpm --rebuild netkit-base-0.10-37.src.rpm
Install it like this:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/inetd stop
rpm -Uhv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/yourarch/netkit
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> What version of inetd are you using? What does rpm -q netkit-base
> show?
netkit-base-0.10-31
=-=-=-=-=-=
Robert Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 16570192
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
Robert,
What version of inetd are you using? What does rpm -q netkit-base
show?
Thanks,
--Matt
--
Matt Galgoci
Job title: export title=`dd if=/dev/random bs=24 count=1`
echo $title
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
> I have a weird problem as of late.
>
I have a weird problem as of late.
In the past couple of weeks, I've had problems with some programs called
under inetd not starting up or stalling out. Specifically, the ident
package. If I -HUP inetd, it will work again for a while but eventually
stop working.
In a similiar vein, I&#
m). Often
when users are pulling mail off this machine, it stops responding. All new
requests seem to "hang". I can restore this either by waiting, or by giving
the inetd a "kill -HUP" and all goes well.
Note that this problem occurred on the regular/uncustomized kernel. I
Hello,
After installing tcp-wrappers from redhat-4.2 I was able to get inetd
working again. However, I am still getting the following messages and
upon looking deep into /var/log/messages I discovered I was getting them
for about a day before the inetd related services died last night:
Apr 9
If you have an "official" readhat 4.1 or 4.2 cdrom, you can get the binary
of inetd off of the cdrom and copy it to your hard drive, then kill inetd and
restart it.
also look for /etc/inetd.conf and make sure it is in good shape.
from that point on, I would compare ls, log
sd has not been started manually. (try ps -aux |
grep bootpsd).
If you suspect that any of the above files have changed you may have to
reinstall them from original distribution.
I hope this helps.
Greg Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got additional info from inetd related message
ly since I'm sending this), pinging, and named
> > appear to be fine. I rebooted and inetd is running but I still can't
> > get
> > any inetd related services. Since I am fairly new at this I am at a
> > loss.
> > Any help, suggestions, or requests for additi
Hello,
I've got additional info from inetd related messages below:
inetd[366]: rfe/tcp: unknown service
inetd[366]: /usr/sbin/tcpd: exit signal 0xb
inetd[366]: bootpsd/udp server failing (looping), service terminated
I came into work today and we've got no POP3 or telnet into
Check your /etc/services file if it's there.
Greg Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I came into work today and we've got no POP3 or telnet into our RH4.1
> machine. SMTP (obviously since I'm sending this), pinging, and named
> appear to be fine. I rebooted and inet
Hello,
I came into work today and we've got no POP3 or telnet into our RH4.1
machine. SMTP (obviously since I'm sending this), pinging, and named
appear to be fine. I rebooted and inetd is running but I still can't get
any inetd related services. Since I am fairly new at this
76 matches
Mail list logo
