Re: newbie: getting rid of spam with spamassasin

2003-10-23 Thread Gerry Doris
ion of SpamAssassin on the RH CD is ancient and full of bugs. You should go to the SpamAssassin site and download an rpm of the latest version. Also, SpamAssassin is intended to work with your MTA. You are probably using either sendmail or postfix if you installed RH 9. It will apply a hea

Re: newbie: getting rid of spam with spamassasin

2003-10-23 Thread Michael S. Dunsavage
I set up Spamassassin with sendmail and set a crontab entry to run fetchmail every 5 minutes. Then I set kmail to use whatever you named your machine as a pop3 server. -- Michael S. Dunsavage -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/li

Re: newbie: getting rid of spam with spamassasin

2003-10-23 Thread Ross Cooney -- Cyber Sentry Ltd
>I'm looking to use spamassasin with kmail if possible but I'm not > sure where to start now. I've looked at online documentation > and getting a little fustrated. Spamassassin is best used with sendmail or qmail, which are mail servers...not email clients. check out the docs section of the web

Re: newbie: getting rid of spam with spamassasin

2003-10-23 Thread Thomas Smith
Geoffrey Lane wrote: I have installed spamassasin rpm off the redhat cd and looked at the documentation at spamassasin's official site but I'm not getting it. I'm looking to use spamassasin with kmail if possible but I'm not sure where to start now. I've looked at online documentation and gettin

newbie: getting rid of spam with spamassasin

2003-10-23 Thread Geoffrey Lane
I have installed spamassasin rpm off the redhat cd and looked at the documentation at spamassasin's official site but I'm not getting it. I'm looking to use spamassasin with kmail if possible but I'm not sure where to start now. I've looked at online documentation and getting a little fustrated.

Re: Postfix & Spam Control

2003-10-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
Brett Franck wrote: Postfix 2.0 is the MTA. How can I allow a host of "63.111.163.37: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname" to be allowed to transfer mail IN to my server but still use the reject_unknown_hostname recipient restriction? Looks like you should create an alternate sm

Postfix & Spam Control

2003-10-14 Thread Brett Franck
All,   I have my Postfix locked down pretty tight for spam, and have come across a small problemI have a host that I want to receive mail from but the "hostname is not found".  Here's a piece of my Postfix Main.cf(applicable)   smtpd_helo_required = yesstrict_r

Re: [SPAM] Why My Mouse do not work on RH9

2003-10-06 Thread Harry Schroeder
and closed? Check the archives. It wasn't too long ago, and some very valid pointers and tips were made. Oh, and just something unrelated - I get so much junk mail from yahoo, that I've simply blacklisted yahoo.com. I have no-one legitimate I need to speak to at that spam haven. Maybe

Re: [SPAM] Why My Mouse do not work on RH9

2003-10-06 Thread Edward Dekkers
pened, discussed and closed? Check the archives. It wasn't too long ago, and some very valid pointers and tips were made. Oh, and just something unrelated - I get so much junk mail from yahoo, that I've simply blacklisted yahoo.com. I have no-one legitimate I need to speak to at that spam

Re: Updated perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks spam assassin?

2003-09-25 Thread Michael Mansour
> The > > recent update to perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 broke > > > spam assasin on my RH8 > > > mail server. All mail that would normally be > > > scanned by spam assassin was > > > being rejected until I reverted to > > > perl-suidperl-5.8.0-55.

Re: Updated perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks spam assassin?

2003-09-25 Thread Mike Vanecek
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:34:03 +1000 (EST), Michael Mansour wrote > --- Ben Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The > recent update to perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 broke > > spam assasin on my RH8 > > mail server. All mail that would normally be > > scanned by spam assass

Re: [SPAM] Re: NAT Problems/Neighbour Table overfow

2003-09-24 Thread Edward Dekkers
Harish wrote: Hi Ed, Really appreciate your speedy resonse,pls find below the errors that I got, this was after I had written the eniries in the rc.local file and then rebooted the machine yestrerday night.Will try giving the full path and let u know. Thanks Once Again Harish Sep 23 23:54:49

Re: Updated perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks spam assassin?

2003-09-23 Thread Ben Holt
, but rather the updated perl-suidperl rpm. The updated rpm was definately my problem with spam assassin. - Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Updated perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks spam assassin?

2003-09-23 Thread Michael Mansour
--- Ben Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The recent update to perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 broke > spam assasin on my RH8 > mail server. All mail that would normally be > scanned by spam assassin was > being rejected until I reverted to > perl-suidperl-5.8.0-55.i386

Updated perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks spam assassin?

2003-09-23 Thread Ben Holt
The recent update to perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 broke spam assasin on my RH8 mail server. All mail that would normally be scanned by spam assassin was being rejected until I reverted to perl-suidperl-5.8.0-55.i386.rpm. Has anyone else experienced a similar problem? - Ben -- redhat-list

Re: Fighting those MS spam mails

2003-09-23 Thread Didier Casse
Well modifying the first part would be nice! __ * ! ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] { * ^Subject: .*(MS|Microsoft|support|admin|Patch|Windows|Internet|Inet) |formail -b -f -A"X-spam-check: bad

Fighting those MS spam mails

2003-09-22 Thread Didier Casse
I noticed that these MS spam mailers do not know how to generate good message id's... which is cool because the simple procmail recipe below got rid of 99% of all these annoying mails! And most of them get caught by the message id's. :-) I know that the Subject line is a bit aggressiv

Fighting those MS spam mails

2003-09-22 Thread Didier Casse
I noticed that these MS spam mailers do not know how to generate good message id's... which is cool because the simple procmail recipe below got rid of 99% of all these annoying mails! And most of them get caught by the message id's. :-) I know that the Subject line is a bit aggressiv

Re: [SPAM] Re: Felix?

2003-08-29 Thread Edward Dekkers
Dont be so rude. we linux users need to stick together, and if friendships are formed over linux than it is a good thing! So, reconsider your comment, please Felix Felix, Jason wasn't being rude at all. He is in fact correct. Meeting linux friends is not what this list is about. I personally ge

Re: [OT] Having SpamAssassin automatically delete SPAM?

2003-08-25 Thread Alan Harding
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:55:11 -0230 Mike Pelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry - How do I configure the SpamAssassin rules to automatically > delete mail identified as spam at the server level (e.g., send it to > /dev/null or whatever). > First of all, its worth rememb

Re: how I can remove the spam?

2003-08-25 Thread Didier Casse
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Ravi Narwade wrote: > > hello everybody, > I am getting spam bye different names how I can recover it, i am using > redhat 7.3 and the sendmail version is 8.11.6. > so please help me... > and what spam command does? This is rather vague. You should be mo

how I can remoce the spam?

2003-08-25 Thread Ravi Narwade
hello everybody, I am getting spam bye different names how I can recover it, i am using redhat 7.3 and the sendmail version is 8.11.6. so please help me... and what spam command does? regards -- ravi -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com

Re: [OT] Having SpamAssassin automatically delete SPAM?

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Pelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry - How do I configure the SpamAssassin rules to automatically delete mail identified as spam at the server level (e.g., send it to /dev/null or whatever). Thanks! Cheers, Mike Jason Dixon wrote: |On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 20:18, Mike Pelley wrote

Re: [OT] Having SpamAssassin automatically delete SPAM?

2003-08-25 Thread Jason Dixon
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 20:18, Mike Pelley wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Folks - A friend of mine wants to set up SpamAssassin so that it will > automatically delete anything categorized as spam at the server level > (e.g., send it to /dev/null

[OT] Having SpamAssassin automatically delete SPAM?

2003-08-25 Thread Mike Pelley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks - A friend of mine wants to set up SpamAssassin so that it will automatically delete anything categorized as spam at the server level (e.g., send it to /dev/null). I've mentioned several times that this might not be a good idea as

RE: spam filter

2003-08-14 Thread Gordon McDowall
By router I presume you mean SMTP mail server. If that's what you mean then SpamAssassin is very good www.spamassassin.org Gordon -Original Message- From: Simon Tischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2003 09:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: spam filter hi c can a

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread David Hart
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 12:29, Ed Wilts wrote: > > Please note that if you implement this, you have the potential to block > a *lot* of legitimate e-mail. For example, this e-mail is coming to > you from the redhat.com domain, yet it's got my From: address on it. > It's quite possible for a legiti

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:41:15AM -0400, Gordon wrote: > I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the sender > uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or msn.com or > whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't exist at all. Can

spam filter

2003-08-14 Thread Simon Tischer
hi c can anyone tell me a got spamfilter for linux, which can be installed on a router? -- --- be blessed Simon -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread Gordon
Ed Wilts wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:41:15AM -0400, Gordon wrote: I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or msn.com or whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't exist at all. C

Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread Gordon
I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or msn.com or whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't exist at all. Can anyone tell me if it's possible (any prefereably how) to have s

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread MKlinke
On Monday 11 August 2003 10:41, Gordon wrote: > I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the > sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or > msn.com or whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't > exist at all. Can

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread Aly Dharshi
Or with the use of Exim, which has is builtin to their configure file, you just have to uncomment it ! Cheers, Aly. On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:54, David Hart wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 11:41, Gordon wrote: > > I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it thro

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread MKlinke
On Monday 11 August 2003 11:39, Gordon wrote: > Ed Wilts wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:41:15AM -0400, Gordon wrote: > >>I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the > >> sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.co

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-14 Thread David Hart
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 11:41, Gordon wrote: > I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the sender > uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or msn.com or > whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't exist at all. Can >

Re: Stopping spam before it gets to you

2003-08-11 Thread Gordon
MKlinke wrote: On Monday 11 August 2003 10:41, Gordon wrote: I've noticed that in most of the spam that makes it through the sender uses a from address of something legitimate like aol.com or msn.com or whatever. I already block email if the domain doesn't exist at all. Can anyone tell

RE: symantec spam message

2003-07-28 Thread Rizzuto, Alan
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Gibbon Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: symantec spam message "Rizzuto, Alan" wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --_=_NextPart_001_01C3552A.C765E8B5 > Content-Type: text/plain; >

Re: symantec spam message

2003-07-28 Thread James Gibbon
just turned off the return message when > it thinks it has spam problems - this has been a pain - I HATE SPAM! Personally, I hate HTML mail - can't you send plain text to the list instead? > IS Administration > > Sturman Industries Inc. > > One Innova

symantec spam message

2003-07-28 Thread Rizzuto, Alan
Sorry for all of the issues – I just turned off the return message when it thinks it has spam problems – this has been a pain – I HATE SPAM!   Alan Rizzuto IS Administration Sturman Industries Inc. One Innovation Way Woodland Park, Co. 80863 (719) 686-6269  

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-09 Thread Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have to see it. I just need to know where to start looking for options to deal with this problem so

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread hanfamily
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 04:16:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > > do I start to figure out how t

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Sunday 06 July 2003 19:24, Ryan McDougall wrote in an attempt to be witty and informative: > > The new mozilla mail app has a Statistical spam filter, supposed to > work well. I havent used it though... > > Good luck, > Ryan It's actually very good, I used to use it

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Ryan McDougall
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 15:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have > to see it. I just need to know where

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Gerry Doris
> Hi, > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have > to see it. I just need to know where to start looking for > options to deal with this

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 06:04, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > start with procmail, and create a .procmailrc file. slowly, > as you learn how the rules work, you'll get rid of more and > more spam. I've posted my /etc/procmailrc for example at: http://thor.prohosting.com/~kilgoret/f

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 04:16:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have > to see it. I just need to

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in an attempt to be witty and informative: > Hi, > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have &g

Re: Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume > and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where > do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have > to see it. I just need to know where to start look

Where to start getting rid of spam

2003-07-06 Thread hanfamily
Hi, I use fetchmail and pine for email. lately the volume and offensiveness of spam has gotten out of hand. Where do I start to figure out how to filter it so I don't have to see it. I just need to know where to start looking for options to deal with this problem so I can start learning w

Postfix Spam Filter Kit

2003-07-06 Thread David Hart
We get about 4,500 emails per week for and see five or six spams. We use NO RBLs nor additional software. I thought I would share our Postfix setup. YMMV. Since none of our staff are tech-types, our approach is process oriented. ftp://ftp.tqmcube.com/pub/postfix/postfix_spam_kit.tar This is pret

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-06 Thread MKlinke
On Sunday 06 July 2003 14:38, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > Your setup is very similar to what I have setup here. I too, frontend > an exchange server with sendmail/spamass-milter/spamassassin. Your > document is not a bad start for people wanting to frontend another > mail server using SA. i.e. procm

RE: Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-06 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: MKlinke > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 11:49 PM > Subject: Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing > > > On Sunday 06 July 2003 03:02, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote: > > >Didn't mean

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-05 Thread MKlinke
r, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO message > on what you did? That way the rest of us can compare notes. I wanted to set up a frontend spam filter for a MS Exchange box and put together this test configuration. We can start with my notes, which may be a little terse, but readable, I hope. Let me kno

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-05 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 7/2/2003 16:30 +0100, you wrote: Didn't mean to send this to the RH list but what the heck! As I said to my office mates, let me know if you have any questions! Yes. Since you've come this far, how about a quick Mini-HOWTO message on what you did? That way the rest of us can compare notes. --

Re: Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-02 Thread MKlinke
of view this testing has been a resounding success! In > the past 30 hours the anti-spam mail server I set up has intercepted > a little over 3300 spam messages that would have been normally > delivered to our email accounts. > > About 500 of these have been passed along to our regul

Some results of the anti-spam testing

2003-07-02 Thread MKlinke
urs the anti-spam mail server I set up has intercepted a little over 3300 spam messages that would have been normally delivered to our email accounts. About 500 of these have been passed along to our regular mail server but marked with the *****SPAM* Subject: and the X-Spam-Level Header entr

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-26 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 24-Jun-2003/12:59 -0500, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:36:22AM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote: >> >> That is unfortunate. I use filters and a homegrown challenge/response >> >> system that operates like this: >> >> >> A combination of procmail, perl, and formail

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:36:22AM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > >> That is unfortunate. I use filters and a homegrown challenge/response > >> system that operates like this: > >> > A combination of procmail, perl, and formail. I've done some very generous snipping... Can you make your code p

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 24-Jun-2003/09:53 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >How do you know which character set the mail is using? Do you read the >body of the email until you find some number of ascii characters that are >outside of your acceptable ascii character range? Or is there a header >entry that you look fo

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread tomh
Subject: Re: Great - just another spam block... Sent by: r

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Anthony E. Greene
es. I cannot vouch for the systems run by Earthlink, or any of the specialty anti-spam companies, but my own system has been setup with the limitations of those systems in mind. I have learned from the mistakes and misadventures of others. I can (and do) quickly respond to any unforeseen mishaps. I

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Anthony E. Greene
e who sends me those stupid >> >messages gets all further mail sent to /dev/null. >> >> That is unfortunate. I use filters and a homegrown challenge/response >> system that operates like this: >> >> 1. Filter mail from mailing lists. >> 2. Filter ma

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Gerry Doris
/null. >> >> That is unfortunate. I use filters and a homegrown challenge/response >> system that operates like this: >> >> 1. Filter mail from mailing lists. >> 2. Filter mail from my scripts. >> 3. Delete mail marked by my ISP as spam (scored 10/10).

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
unfortunate. I use filters and a homegrown challenge/response > system that operates like this: > > 1. Filter mail from mailing lists. > 2. Filter mail from my scripts. > 3. Delete mail marked by my ISP as spam (scored 10/10). > 4. Delete mail in character sets which I cannot

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-24 Thread Anthony E. Greene
es like this: 1. Filter mail from mailing lists. 2. Filter mail from my scripts. 3. Delete mail marked by my ISP as spam (scored 10/10). 4. Delete mail in character sets which I cannot read. 5. Delete mail from unwanted senders (blacklist/killfile). 6. Filter mail from known senders (whitelist)

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-19 Thread Edward Dekkers
Gerry Doris wrote: I'm not sure that works. I believe RBL may be a service that costs you $$$ to use? What I actually have is score RCVD_IN_SPAMCOP_NET 4 score RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG 4 score RCVD_IN_SBL 4 score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 4 score RCVD_IN_NJABL 4

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-19 Thread Anthony E. Greene
On 18-Jun-2003/21:27 -0500, Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:21, T. Ribbrock wrote: >> Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be >> allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running >> list mail via such a mail address is ru

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-19 Thread Gerry Doris
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Edward Dekkers wrote: > Gerry Doris wrote: > > > I've cranked up the RBL's score to 4 from whatever the defaults are > > and dropped my threshold to 4 from the default of 5. I'm also using > > Bayes scoring which isn't appearing in your list. > > OK Gerry - I just added: >

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:16:15PM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote: > Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: > > > > >One could always get an email client with spam filtering capabilities > >built in (like Mozilla) > > > It just takes a while teach mozilla that all of your mailing l

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Matthew Galgoci wrote: > I've removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I think using such a service on a > list is about the most obnoxious thing I've seen in a long time. > > Please send reports to the redhat-list-admin email address, I only check > the list ab

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Edward Dekkers
Gerry Doris wrote: I've cranked up the RBL's score to 4 from whatever the defaults are and dropped my threshold to 4 from the default of 5. I'm also using Bayes scoring which isn't appearing in your list. OK Gerry - I just added: score RCVD_IN_RBL 4.00 the default appears to be 0.00 That ough

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
Samuel Flory wrote: Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: One could always get an email client with spam filtering capabilities built in (like Mozilla) It just takes a while teach mozilla that all of your mailing lists aren't spam;-) I've not had that problem actually, although there are tim

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Gerry Doris
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Edward Dekkers wrote: > Gerry Doris wrote: > > > What a hoot! Look what my SpamAssassin thought of this idiot's challenge > > message...it decided it was SPAM and junked it!!! > > Kewl - now why didn't mine? > > No, hits=3.3

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 20:07, Edward Dekkers wrote: > Gerry Doris wrote: > > > What a hoot! Look what my SpamAssassin thought of this idiot's challenge > > message...it decided it was SPAM and junked it!!! > > Kewl - now why didn't mine? > > No, hits=3.3

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Bret Hughes
ly [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not want to receive > any mail from this list, hence, I suggest he unsubscribes... > > I wonder, is there a way for the list software to recognize and > unsubscribe such folks? > I was wondering what you were talking about until I dug into my spam folder. F

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Edward Dekkers
Gerry Doris wrote: What a hoot! Look what my SpamAssassin thought of this idiot's challenge message...it decided it was SPAM and junked it!!! Kewl - now why didn't mine? No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,EXCHANGE_SERVER,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ, MIME_NULL_BLOCK,

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Matthew Galgoci
I've removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I think using such a service on a list is about the most obnoxious thing I've seen in a long time. Please send reports to the redhat-list-admin email address, I only check the list about once a day. On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote: > Just got anot

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Samuel Flory
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: One could always get an email client with spam filtering capabilities built in (like Mozilla) It just takes a while teach mozilla that all of your mailing lists aren't spam;-) -- There is no such thing as obsolete hardware. Merely hardware that other people

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Gerry Doris
ain stupid! Running > >>list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO. > >> > >>Anyway, apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not want to receive > >>any mail from this list, hence, I suggest he unsubscribes... What a hoot! Look what my SpamAssas

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
PROTECTED] does not want to receive any mail from this list, hence, I suggest he unsubscribes... in all fairness, i just tried to set up something like this through earthlink (AKA mindspring) and was thoroughly frustrated with how useless it was. One could always get an email client with spam

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Gerry Doris
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:42:08AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 00:21 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > | I wonder, is there a way for the list software to recognize and > > | unsubscribe such folks? > > > > No, bec

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Res
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > > Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be > > allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running > > list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO. >

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:42:08AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 00:21 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > | I wonder, is there a way for the list software to recognize and > | unsubscribe such folks? > > No, because the report goes directly to the poster. > The list

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Robert P. J. Day
;From". double stupid. while there's no doubt that we're going to be seeing more of these "please register" messages, based on my experience, i'm going to be at least a little understanding. it's the symptom of people who are (like many of us) sick to de

Re: Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 00:21 19 Jun 2003, T. Ribbrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be | allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running | list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO. [...] | I wonder, is there a way for

Re: [LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread Joseph A Nagy Jr
T. Ribbrock wrote: Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO. Anyway, apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not want to receive any mail from this lis

[LISTADMIN] Great - just another spam block...

2003-06-18 Thread T. Ribbrock
Just got another one of those "SpamBlock: Please register to be allowed to send mail to me" mails - this is just plain stupid! Running list mail via such a mail address is rude at the least, IMO. Anyway, apparently [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not want to receive any mail from this list, hence, I sugges

Re: off topic- spam arrest verification request

2003-06-11 Thread Martin Moss
I agree, smacks of 'Lets jump on the band wagon' approach! Marty - Original Message - From: "alan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "redhat list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:19 P

Re: off topic- spam arrest verification request

2003-06-11 Thread alan
"solution" that does not scale well, if at all. At this point, I will be adding SpamArrest messages to my spam filters. If someone is too clueless to set up a mail filter that does not require human intervention for every sender, then they just won't get my messages. Besides.

off topic- spam arrest verification request

2003-06-11 Thread Randy Perkins
lines of this message, i believe this message in itself could be considered spam. i agree that spam is a problem, and due to spammers some mail servers wont even accept mail from my cable modem. It is necessary to route it through my isp. my own personal solution to spam is to use spamassassin on

RE: Spam killing with Redhat7.3 before e-mail reaches Exchange.

2003-06-03 Thread MW Mike Weiner (5028)
> We have Sendmail running on RH 7.3, forwarding mail to an Exchange > server. Installed SpamAssassin and have not yet found *details* on how > to successfully integrate it with Sendmail. Would like to configure > SpamAssassin to add "*SPAM*" to the Subject line of

Re: *SPAM-FILTERED* Programming Network subsystem

2003-06-03 Thread Gordon Messmer
Mohammed Awad wrote: Hi all, I need someone to tell me about some good reference to push me into the field of programming of the Linux Network subsystem. I need to write a code to implement some additional functionality for the NAT protocol. http://www.netfilter.org/ Specifically, you want to look

RE: Spam killing with Redhat7.3 before e-mail reaches Exchange.

2003-06-03 Thread Steve Cowles
pamAssassin to add "*SPAM*" to the Subject line of each > suspected email and still forward it the user's inbox on the Exchange > server. Once there, setting rules to redirect the spam is not a > problem. > > Can someone point me to more explicit documentatio

RE: Spam killing with Redhat7.3 before e-mail reaches Exchange.

2003-06-03 Thread James D. Parra
Hello,   We have Sendmail running on RH 7.3, forwarding mail to an Exchange server.  Installed SpamAssassin and have not yet found *details* on how to successfully integrate it with Sendmail. Would like to configure SpamAssassin to add "*SPAM*" to the Subject line of each

Re: *SPAM-FILTERED* GTK+2.2 update?!?

2003-05-29 Thread Gordon Messmer
Pauly wrote: - I don't wanna use LD_LIBRARY_PATH, due to the known reasons. What known reasons? And even as I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH in /etc/profile, gnome isn't starting correctly, cause it can't find the old gtk 2.0 libs then. Then only set the variable for the program, when you run it. It sh

Re: Spam blocking for Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:05:15AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > . If > your conserned about false positives then RBL is the wrong way to go! I should have clarified my original statements. There are good RBLs and there ar

Re: Spam blocking for Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread fluke
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote: > > I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only > > lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassasin > > onl

Re: Spam blocking for Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Jeff Kinz
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:46:47AM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Jason Cordes wrote: > > I'm using a rbl on my sendmail server here for my company but that has only > > lightly cut down on the amount of spam some of my users get. Is spamassa

RE: Spam blocking for Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Jason Cordes
False positives are my big problem right now. I have Norton Antivirus for exchange on my exchange server and it includes a spam filter but it created waaay too many false positives and blocked legitimate email. I suppose I'll just tune my word lists and block whatever bypasses my RBL'

Re: Spam blocking for Sendmail

2003-04-02 Thread Eric Wood
spamassassin is include with RH9. Although, probably not gui configurable along with the redhat sendmail gui. But yes, blocking open relays only helps a little. Spam still comes via legitamate gateways. IMHO, MIMEDefang can block spam without the need for spamassassin - and it would be at the

  1   2   3   4   5   >