OK thanks again. Darn Decaf.
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also
> don't
> > know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4.
>
> Of course, i386 and i686
Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote:
> Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also don't
> know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4.
Of course, i386 and i686 binaries will run fine on a P4, though perhaps
marginally slower that if they were P4 optim
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:01PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> [...]
> > If you must have 2.95.3 (or any version of the compiler that doesn't come
> > as an RPM *designed to live peacefully with the stock comiler*), the best
> > strategy is to grab the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Matthew
>
> WOW! Thanks very much for instructions.
>
> Daniel
Just so we are clear, the instructions are due to John Matthews, not me.
They are pretty good, though.
>
> Quoting "Matthews, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>[nice instructions for building
nd I'll help you. I do
> this kind
> of thing a lot.
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Sheltraw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GCC and Redhat 8.0
>
>
> Hello
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:01PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
[...]
> If you must have 2.95.3 (or any version of the compiler that doesn't come
> as an RPM *designed to live peacefully with the stock comiler*), the best
> strategy is to grab the tarballs from gcc.gnu.org and install them in
> /
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 10:21, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Cliff
>
>
> > > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > > real-time executiv
a lot.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Sheltraw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCC and Redhat 8.0
Hello Again
> > > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something
> else
> > &
Matthew
OK thnks for all of your help.
Daniel
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> > Matthew
> >
> > Would you happen to know where I could download binaries for a
> > Pentium 4 machine? I did not see the binaries for this ubiquitous
>
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Matthew
>
> Would you happen to know where I could download binaries for a
> Pentium 4 machine? I did not see the binaries for this ubiquitous
> machine on the binaries page of the GNU GCC site. I have never
> compiled a compiler and do not know if GCC
Matthew
> > > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler
> and
> > > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a
> README
> > > f
Cliff
> > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a README
> > file that the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 09:29, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> >
> > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTA
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 09:29, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI pa
Hello Again
> > > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something
> else
> > > > altogether ?
> > >
> > > Yes, kgcc.
> >
> > I doubt it. I don't even have kgcc installed, and no problem
> building
> > anything. I think kgcc was just a 7.x creature, back when early
> 2.96
> > compile
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> >
> > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> > > altogether ?
> >
> > Yes, kgcc.
>
> I doubt it. I don't even have k
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:02:08AM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
>
> > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> > altogether ?
>
> Yes, kgcc.
I doubt it. I don't even have kgcc installed, and no problem building
anything. I thin
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
> altogether ?
Yes, kgcc.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aly.
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:41, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Redhat list
> > >
So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something else
altogether ?
Cheers,
Aly.
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 21:41, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> > Hello Redhat list
> >
> > I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
>
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
> Hello Redhat list
>
> I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
> Does RedHat 8.0 have a compiler fit for kernel work in particular
> 2.95.x?
What kernel? AFAIK, Red Hat compiles their 8.0 kernels with the included
gcc 3.2. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:14:14 -0600, Mark Richardson wrote:
> I am running RedHat 8.0 with the latest kernel and downloaded VMWare beta 4
> so I can run my Windows ME apps. During the VM install, the installer could
> not find a "gcc" compiler. I pop
Mark Richardson wrote:
I am running RedHat 8.0 with the latest kernel and downloaded VMWare beta 4
so I can run my Windows ME apps. During the VM install, the installer could
not find a "gcc" compiler. I popped in my RH 8 install disk, found the
"gcc" files and began to install them. THEN I got
Hello Michael!
It really does seem like gcc 3.2 bug because I installed gcc 3.2.2 from
rawhide and everything works perfectly. I have Athlon 2000XP and if I'm
not mistaking, other people who had problems with gcc 3.2 also use
Athlon.
Anyway, this is not a problem for me anymore. For completenes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08 Mar 2003 15:17:08 +0100, Josip Gracin wrote:
> > Can you recompile the kernel with Red Hat's config?
>
> Nope.
.oO
> > What steps are necessary to reproduce it?
>
> cd /usr/src/linux-2.4
> make mrproper
> cp configs/kernel-2.4.18-athlon.conf
Michael Schwendt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can you recompile the kernel with Red Hat's config?
Nope.
> What steps are necessary to reproduce it?
cd /usr/src/linux-2.4
make mrproper
cp configs/kernel-2.4.18-athlon.config .config
make oldconfig
make dep
make bzImage
/* each file gets the follow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 Mar 2003 23:18:19 +0100, Josip Gracin wrote:
> And I don't seem to be the only one who cannot compile a thing using GCC
> 3.2 from RedHat 8.0 (check with google for 'gcc 3.2 redhat segmentation
> fault'). In the middle of kernel compilation (al
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Daniel Callahan wrote:
> We have a quandary: a box with RH 7.3 that needs to upgrade to gcc 3.2x
> Why? gcc-2.96 produces buggy code when optimizing FORTRAN-77, and these
> programs are large enough that we need the extra speed. We're hoping gcc
> 3.2x will fix this. We've
-lstdc++ means to include the file "libstdc++". If you see something like
-L it means to include that directory in the search path for libraries. I
think you may be able to fix your problem by locating where the libstdc++
files are. From what you wrote I'm guessing they are in /usr/local/lib.
Yo
Op zaterdag 9 november 2002 15:51, schreef Michael Schwendt:
Thank you,
i han no idee there where subchannels
Patrick
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:19:07 +0100, Patrick wrote:
> > at this moment i have gcc 2.96 on my RH 7.3 machine, but for
> > Open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:19:07 +0100, Patrick wrote:
> at this moment i have gcc 2.96 on my RH 7.3 machine, but for
> OpenOffice 1.0.1 dutch i need gcc3.x hase anyone a idee where to find
> it, or if its on the RH 80 cd's can i use it from there?
You ca
What's your first error?
I don't know what's going on on your system, but your program works fine.
My test of your test:
[apj@wattsx apj]$ gcc -o test test.c
[apj@wattsx apj]$ ll
-rwxrwxr-x1 apj apj 11369 Nov 5 22:24 test
-rw-rw-r--1 apj apj 107 Nov 5 22:24
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 03:22 am, you is done writ:
> Just to test gcc, I tried to compile this:
>
> ***test.c***
> #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>printf("By Jove, it works!\n");
>return 0;
> }
> *** end file ***
>
> with this:
> gcc -o test test.c
>
> And it didn't wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 01:13:41 -0800 (PST), anthony baldwin wrote:
> Just to test gcc, I tried to compile this:
>
> ***test.c***
> #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>printf("By Jove, it works!\n");
>return 0;
> }
> *** end file ***
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:13:41AM -0800, anthony baldwin wrote:
>
> Just to test gcc, I tried to compile this:
On my system, I get:
[seyman@munshine seyman]$ rpm -q redhat-release gcc
redhat-release-7.3-1
gcc-2.96-112
[seyman@munshine seyman]$ cat test.c
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:39:18 -0600, mark wrote:
> Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just
> fine.
>
> Wrong.
>
> About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (seems to be
> the real stable release). I was g
> > Wrong.
>
> What compiler do you think Red Hat uses to compile their 2.4 kernels?
> (they use 2.96 on 7.x)
what do they use for RH8.0? I've been unable to compile a kernel with
either gcc 3.1 or 2.96 (both latest rpms from RedHat).
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o parport.o share.o ieee1284.o ieee1284_op
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, mark wrote:
> Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just fine.
Recent versions are.
> Wrong.
What compiler do you think Red Hat uses to compile their 2.4 kernels?
(they use 2.96 on 7.x)
> About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:39:18AM -0600, mark wrote:
> >also work but is not as safe, and *gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer supported*.
>
> Ok? No FUD, personal knowledge, and documented in the source.
Nope. Its still FUD.
Read further, ./Documentation/Changes:
Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer
Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just fine.
Wrong.
About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (seems to be the
real stable release). I was getting SEGVs, alternating with undefined
functions or variables. I finally succeded only by doing the make b
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:10:23PM -0600, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Tried compiling this simple program and can't understand why the error,
> system produces the following errors:
>
> test_cc1.cc: In
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:10, Aly Dharshi wrote:
Oops typo in my second fix. In my first reply. That should read.
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> std::cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
> return 0;
> }
Regards,
Jim H
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:red
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:10, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
> cout << "Testing 1 2 3 ... \n";
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Tried compiling this simple program and can't understand why the error,
> system produces the following errors:
>
> test_cc1.cc: In function `in
Espiritu, Alice M wrote:
>Has anyone tried to replace the gcc3.2 that comes with 8.0 with gcc2.96?
>
>Or
>
>Does anyone have a way the gcc3.2 and gcc2.96 can exist on the same linux
>system?
>
>
>
>
>
Maybe:
[sflory@sflory sflory]$ ls /80/RedHat/RPMS/compat-*7.3*
/80/RedHat/RPMS/compat-gcc-7.3-
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:17:52PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I installed redhat 7.3 which also has gcc 2.96, how can I switch to gcc
> 2.95 or kgcc to compile the kernel ? Is there any document I can
> follow ?
You don't need to. 2.96 works great with 2.4 kernel, and any recent
2.2 ker
Did I just subscribe the mailing list ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@redhat.com on 09/10/2002 03:17:52 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: gcc 2.95 on redhat 7.3
Hi:
I installed redhat 7.3 which also has gcc 2.96, how can I sw
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Hunter Scales wrote:
> I need to upgrade my compiler from the gcc 2.96 that came with my Redhat
> installation to gcc 3.2. Can someone tell me where to find the RPM for
> this? Or do I have to get a gzip file from GNU?
I can't find the reply that already appeared explainin
On 14:56 16 Jul 2002, Hunter Scales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I need to upgrade my compiler from the gcc 2.96 that came with my Redhat
| installation to gcc 3.2. Can someone tell me where to find the RPM for
| this? Or do I have to get a gzip file from GNU?
You're probably better off just
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Michael George wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:04:32PM -0700, Rob Emanuele wrote:
> > redhat doesn't have a 3.2 rpm that i know of yet. they do have a
> > 3.x family release in the rawhide distribution.
>
> My RHL 7.2 CDs have 3.0 something on them. I'm guessing my 7.3
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:04:32PM -0700, Rob Emanuele wrote:
> redhat doesn't have a 3.2 rpm that i know of yet. they do have a
> 3.x family release in the rawhide distribution.
My RHL 7.2 CDs have 3.0 something on them. I'm guessing my 7.3 set has some
even more up to date, but I haven't inst
redhat doesn't have a 3.2 rpm that i know of yet. they do have a
3.x family release in the rawhide distribution.
ftp to a redhat mirror and find the rawhide directory under the
redhat tree.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter Scales
S
--- Martín Marqués <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone
explain to me what are the differences (religious if
> you want)
> between gcc and egcs? Why did RH have gcc, then passed to egcs and
> now is
> back to gcc?
egcs was a fork of egcs a few years which got folded back in as
gcc-2.91
gc
The reason for egcs is that gcc 2.8 was terrible, and was not being
maintained. I believe egcs was a fork done of gcc by Cygnus that actually
worked. Therefore, many distributions switched to egcs because it
optimized better, had better C++ support, and was being maintained better.
The Free Soft
Hi Matthew
I hope you don't mind me taking this off list - I think it's a bit off
topic.
I had a need to do this the other day. So I installed 2.95.3 from a
tarball and installed it under /usr/local
However the code I am trying to compile (Orbacus Notify) still does not
compile. I made sure the
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Daniel BI wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Cold anyone tell me how to downgrade the gcc 2.96 compiler
> under linux red hat 7.2 to 2.95 ?
The short answer is: Don't.
The longer answer is: Fix your code first. In most cases, code that won't
compile under 2.96RH is broken code. In orde
David Talkington wrote:
-
>So I have me handy dandy RH7.2 Laptop install... works great, but I went
to
>install the perl dbi stuff and it came up with the error of no gcc... What
>packages do I need to install to be able to utilize this?
Um ... I'd start with gcc. =)
Durin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Nelson wrote:
>So I have me handy dandy RH7.2 Laptop install... works great, but I went to
>install the perl dbi stuff and it came up with the error of no gcc... What
>packages do I need to install to be able to utilize this?
Um ... I'd st
"Stuart Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where do i find gcc on the redhat 7.1 cd's?
In the gcc rpms.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-lis
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
>
> > I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed an
> > indordinate amount of warnings..
>
> The warnings are harmless. They indicate bad/unportable code in the kernel
> (2
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:07:56PM -0700, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
: I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed an
: indordinate amount of warnings.. A friend told me to switch back to
: gcc 2.95.2 because it is more stable..
Oh, "a friend". If I had a nickel for every
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed an
> indordinate amount of warnings..
The warnings are harmless. They indicate bad/unportable code in the kernel
(2.96 is much more aware of standards than any other version).
>
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:07:56PM -0700, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed
> an indordinate amount of warnings.. A friend told me to switch back
> to gcc 2.95.2 because it is more stable..
>
> Why is RH going with a NON release gcc??
The funny thing about all of this is.. RedHat had been quite a bit behind
in releases before version 6.0 of the distro. Then during 6.x, they were
doing pretty well. Now with 7.0, they've hit the other extreme and started
going a bit too cutting edge with a few of their beta software inclusions.
There is a newer release on the Redhat site.
Assuming you're running RH7 at this point, you could try running "up2date"
to get a list of the most recent updates for your system.
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 10:12:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I used the rpm to upgrade gcc and as a test to see if all these good
> fixes did anything I tried to compile the kernel.
>
> It doesn't work. gcc still fails at the old parameter problem. I had to
> switch back to kgcc t
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I used the rpm to upgrade gcc and as a test to see if all these good
> fixes did anything I tried to compile the kernel.
>
> It doesn't work. gcc still fails at the old parameter problem. I had to
> switch back to kgcc to do a successful comp
Well, I used the rpm to upgrade gcc and as a test to see if all these good
fixes did anything I tried to compile the kernel.
It doesn't work. gcc still fails at the old parameter problem. I had to
switch back to kgcc to do a successful compile.
Surely a linux c compiler should be able to compi
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> Ok, I found it interesting that the only reference to this gcc 2.96
> update was simply "bug fixes". Well how about telling us what KIND of
> bug fixes were made... how annoying...
The official announcement contained a list of Bugzilla entries fixe
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 06:38:38AM -0700, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> Ok, I found it interesting that the only reference to this gcc 2.96
> update
> was simply "bug fixes". Well how about telling us what KIND of bug fixes
>
> were made... how annoying...
I guess you didn't bother to read the whol
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:42:37PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
[...]
> files in the package is dependent on audiofile.h which is
> /usr/local/kde2/include, but gcc can't find it. how can i fix this? i know
> if i was invoking gcc myself i'd use the -I option. but this package is
> be
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:30:07AM -0700, Brian Wright wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to track down GCC 2.95.2 RPMs that I can use with RH 7, along
> with any corresponding glibc RPMs, but haven't had much luck here.
>
> I plan to make RPMs, but want to make sure I use a binary compatible
> comp
%-> 1) I note that the libstdc++ include directory is:
%->
%-> /usr/include/g++-3
%->
%->is it possible to install this alongside the egcs include directory
%->(/usr/include/g++) without problems ?
%->
%-> 2) is it possible to install both libstdc++ libraries, the old one
%->fo
On 05-Jul-00 Juha Saarinen wrote:
> %-> Does anyone know what issues might be involved with swapping
> %-> compilers on
> %-> a RH 6.x system, either forward to gcc 2.95, or backwards to gcc 2.7.2
>
> The only issues I've seen so far have been with libstdc++ -- you have to
> install a newer vers
%-> Does anyone know what issues might be involved with swapping
%-> compilers on
%-> a RH 6.x system, either forward to gcc 2.95, or backwards to gcc 2.7.2
The only issues I've seen so far have been with libstdc++ -- you have to
install a newer version than the one that comes with RH6.x to be ab
You should switch to gcc-2.95.2. It is the latest stable version and works
fine. If you are having problems with egcs that should b\not be suprising
as there are a few subtle language issues associated with this.
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Strange
Hello Margaretha Sulistyoningsih (On 06/25/00,12:01pm,you wrote Re: Re:...
MS> Thank's to Stephen Liu, Elaine(Er-Chan), Claudiu Balciza, Linda Hanigan, for
MS> their answer.
MS> Because of you all right now I can compile with gcc -o.
MS>
MS> I try to run all command from you all. The last com
Thank's to Stephen Liu, Elaine(Er-Chan), Claudiu Balciza, Linda Hanigan, for
their answer.
Because of you all right now I can compile with gcc -o.
I try to run all command from you all. The last command I try is updating
glibc:
rpm -U /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/glibc-devel-2.1.1-6.i386.rpm
But I
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 00:37
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: gcc -o]]
"Claudiu Balciza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
run this command:
rpm -ql `rpm -qa|grep glibc-devel` | grep crt
***Hi Claudiu, I run that command and the result is :
package glibc-
Hello Margaretha Sulistyoningsih (On 06/21/00,9:37pm,you wrote Re: Re:...
MS> I still need further answer from you and also from others.
MS>
MS> Thank you so much, Claudiu, and also for Stephen and er-Chan.
MS>
MS> For er-Chan : would you tell me spesifically the name of the rpm(the rpm for
MS
- Original Message -
***Hi Claudiu, I run that command and the result is :
package glibc-devel is not installed.
It would only take a minute to reintall it. When I first loaded
6.0 I had some trouble with X even though the package I
needed was installed it had lost something I
"Claudiu Balciza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
run this command:
rpm -ql `rpm -qa|grep glibc-devel` | grep crt
***Hi Claudiu, I run that command and the result is :
package glibc-devel is not installed.
Because I'm so sure that I've install it (with rpm -i)so, I try to change the
comma
MS> Marisa Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MS> do you have glibc-devel installed? you need this.
MS>
MS>
MS> ***Yes, Marisa, I have glibc-devel-2.1.1-6 installed in my computer. But still
MS> I cann't compile with gcc -o.
MS>
MS> --Ritha--
I think you also need kernel-h
lease contact me off-list. I
shall try my best to assist you.
B.R.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Margaretha Sulistyoningsih" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: gcc -o]
> Marisa Mack <[EMAIL
run this command:
rpm -ql `rpm -qa|grep glibc-devel` | grep crt
the output will show the *crt* files from the glibc-devel packages
Claudiu
---
On Mon, Jul 21, 2036 at 06:21:52PM +, ritha_ok graced me with:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to
Marisa Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
do you have glibc-devel installed? you need this.
***Yes, Marisa, I have glibc-devel-2.1.1-6 installed in my computer. But still
I cann't compile with gcc -o.
To Stephen Liu, Thank's so much for giving me advice to get R.H 6.2. But right
now, I just cann'
Hi Ritha,
If you don't want to follow my foot steps, forget R.H. 6.0 and get R.H. 6.2.
I learnt a bitter lesson to compile/upgrade/install kernel and
Voodoo/Banshee on R.H.6.0, taking me nearly 2 months without result. With
the assistance from many nice guys on several relevant lists, I continue
do you have glibc-devel installed? you need this. you should be able to
find the rpm easily, if not, try www.rpmfind.net
marisa
On Mon, Jul 21, 2036 at 06:21:52PM +, ritha_ok graced me with:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to compile c source code with gcc -o and I got this error message.
>
> /usr/bin
I am running BSD at home so I am doing this from memory
Try "rpm -qf gcc" or try
"rpm -qf cc" this will show you the rpm for gcc or cc
Without a C compiler it is very annoying isn't it?
dannyh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Paul Brown wrote:
> > I would like to know which package nam
> I would like to know which package name is for gcc or cc. I need
> to install this gcc package in order to complie my SSL server. like
> ./configure --with-apache=../apache_1.3.12 , so I need to install gcc
> or cc but I don't know the package name for gcc or cc. Please point me
> out.
Mark
egcs
you are bound to need several *devel packages as well, but I'm not sure
which ones off hand.
hth
charles
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Mark Lo wrote:
> I would like to know which package name is for gcc or cc. I need
> to install this gcc package in order to complie my SSL server. like
> ./c
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:33:46PM -0300, Marco Shaw wrote:
> Well got a GCC 2.95 RPM and installed it on a clean 6.2 box. It also
> needed cpp-2.95, and binutils-2.9.5. Should I be aware of any issues with
> this install as even the most simplest programs will not compile:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o:
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program as got fatal signal 11
Usually means a Segmentation fault occured. A SIG11 is given when an
application attempts to access memory outside of it's allocated area, or
in a manner opposite of the declared format. ie if the memory is locked
as read only and it
Sorry for the double post. Strange that my second message showed up first. My first
message must have taken the frontage road instead of the information super highway.
;-)
I seemed to have found part of my solution - egcs appears to be the package I want.
But it doesn't say which version of gcc i
Sorry for the double post. I just had a little trouble with mailer (which
is now fixed). I thought that the first message did not go out.
Cheers,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Mitchell Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Economics mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Queen's University
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Alessandro Coppelli wrote:
> Hi to all.
>
>Is there the RPM for new GCC 2.95.2 ?
Raw Hide (ftp://rawhide.redhat.com/).
LLaP
bero
--
The first time Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is when they
start making vacuum cleaners.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMA
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Lee, Gilbert (NY Corp) wrote:
> Simple question really: is there an environment variable that tells GCC
> where to look for libraries other than the default path? I want to create a
> user-defined lib directory of my own but don't know how to tell GCC where to
> look.
echo
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 12:03:03AM +1100, Clement wrote:
> Thank you very much to all who have replied. Following your
> recommendations, the problem is found to be one with the memory.
> Interesting though, it is fixed by re-fitting the SIMM modules.
[...]
Well, in that case, I'd assume tha
Thank you very much to all who have replied. Following your
recommendations, the problem is found to be one with the memory.
Interesting though, it is fixed by re-fitting the SIMM modules.
To Hidong, the Cyrix chip is considered by Linux as a i586 chip.
6x86-PR166+ is the name that Cyrix gi
The Cyrix 6x86 chips run *extremely* hot. Make sure that you have a
very large heatsink and fan on it, that you are using heat sink
grease on all junctions. Also make sure that the fan works and
that the fan and heatsink are clear of dustpuppies.
--Matt
--
Matt Galgoci
Job title: export
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 05:08:40PM +1100, Clement wrote:
> When compiling package on a 6x86-PR166+ using gcc from egcs-1.1.2-24, I
> got this error message:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -I./../Include -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ./parsermodule.c
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
[.
Clement wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> When compiling package on a 6x86-PR166+ using gcc from egcs-1.1.2-24, I
> got this error message:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -I./../Include -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c ./parsermodule.c
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
>
> It happens in a few packages,
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
