The funny thing about all of this is.. RedHat had been quite a bit behind
in releases before version 6.0 of the distro. Then during 6.x, they were
doing pretty well. Now with 7.0, they've hit the other extreme and started
going a bit too cutting edge with a few of their beta software inclusions.
I think they should have stuck to the 6.x way of things.. but then again..
I guess this is why it's 7.0 and not 6.3 :)
I still sticking with 6.2, here.
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Frank Jacobberger wrote:
> I was just trying to make a new 2.4.0 test13-pre4 kernel and noticed an
> indordinate amount of warnings.. A friend told me to switch back to
> gcc 2.95.2 because it is more stable..
>
> Why is RH going with a NON release gcc?? Why do we need to run
> 2.91.? of kgcc to compile new kernels...
>
> Why all this madness... why not stick to standards?
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
-Statux
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
