On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 07:13, Felipe Leon wrote:
> Group:
> At home I have two computers with RH9 connected to a router (dhcp
> server) which connects to the internet through a dsl modem. In order to
> facilitate internal networking among the two computers, on installation
> I s
Group:
At home I have two computers with RH9 connected to a router (dhcp
server) which connects to the internet through a dsl modem. In order to
facilitate internal networking among the two computers, on installation
I set both eth0 as trusted devices. Is that save? the router has a built
in
On 01-Oct-2003/04:41 -0500, TBrowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> That way, when gdm tries to make a network connection to realhostname, it
>> will resolve to 127.0.0.1 instead of querying the DNS.
>
>Can this situation
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That way, when gdm tries to make a network connection to realhostname, it
> will resolve to 127.0.0.1 instead of querying the DNS.
Can this situation happen even without any interface using DHCP? As far as I
know, it isn
On 30-Sep-2003/16:23 -0500, TBrowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>While up and running several hosts running RedHat 8 and 9 on a local
>network, the network went down for an office move. After graceful
>shutdowns and the host were moved to our new office, we attempted to
>restart them without a net
While up and running several hosts running RedHat 8
and 9 on a local network, the network went down for an office
move. After graceful shutdowns and the host were moved to our
new office, we attempted to restart them without a network connection. To
our surpise, the X server and gdm couldn
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/03 11:03AM >>>
Beside getting my home network up and running I was curious to find out
if RH's usability was as bad as I thought for this sort of things.
Unfortunately it is.
It works great for what you want to do, I use mine just as you want.
The learning curve is a l
Thanks to John and all the others who replied.
Beside getting my home network up and running I was curious to find out
if RH's usability was as bad as I thought for this sort of things.
Unfortunately it is.
In conclusion: I am going to have to RTFM because I don't want to use
windows, I want the
will run as a service
# only change this if the location on your system is different. It
# shouldn't be.
# Source function library.
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
# Source networking configuration.
# only change this if the location on your system is different. It
# should
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RH9 home networking
>
>
> Yes, why are you all making this so difficult?
>
> I use my machine exactly as you want to set up yours.
> It is a RH9 machine that is
> Firewall/Gateway/WebServer/FTPServer for my home network. The
> Inter
Yes, why are you all making this so difficult?
I use my machine exactly as you want to set up yours.
It is a RH9 machine that is Firewall/Gateway/WebServer/FTPServer for my home network.
The Internet connection sharing is done with iptables forwarding and masquerading
packets.
First you need to
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Michael Kalus wrote:
There might be the simple problem that the ISP is only going to hand out one
IP Address.
Rogers for example is that way, they lock your cable modem down to one IP
(unless you buy more) per Modem.
which is precisely what's happe
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Michael Kalus wrote:
why are you making this so difficult? why not have the cable
modem go to the hub, and let the hosts all plug into the hub?
that's what we're doing here, and it's pretty easy.
unless you have a static IP for that first box and wa
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
Here is my problem:
I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
cable modem and the other to a hub. I would like to share the Internet
connection with other computers in the house.
I was hoping to find a "share
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 15:44, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > > and? ... all that's connected to the cable modem is a single linksys
> > > hub. that's a single MAC address. what's the prob
> I have rogers cable in Canada and just setup my home network.
>
> I bought a LinkSys Wireless Router, the cable plugs into the
> modem, the LAN connection from the modem goes to the router
> WAN connection and every PC plugs into the Router or uses
> wireless. Pretty simple and everything wor
> ok, pay attention.
>
> DSL outlet -> DSL modem -> linksys 4-port hub with wireless.
>
> from linksys hub:
>
> - one wired PC running XP
> - one wireless access laptop running RH 9
>
> cost of linksys hub: $89 US.
>
> and yes, it works, it really does, given that both machines
> are on
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > and? ... all that's connected to the cable modem is a single linksys
> > hub. that's a single MAC address. what's the problem?
>
> Huh? A hub has >ZERO< MAC addresses. It's a simple li
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 3 Jul 2003, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> i'm not sure if we're just not communicating here, but let me clarify
> wh
> On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> >
> > > Here is my problem:
> > >
> > > I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
> > > cable modem and the other to a hub. I would like to share the Internet
> > > connecti
ammed this
weekend by a bunch of hackers. Don't let your machine fall victim.)
BobB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel Dui
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:03 AM
To: redhat-list
Subject: Re: RH9 home networking
Thanks for your m
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 05:00:55PM +0100, Daniel Dui wrote:
> And I want the machine connected to the modem to be always on and
> visible from the outside.
Many of these small routers have a feature where any incoming packets
can be sent to a specific internal machine on the NAT they set up. My
D
---
From: Daniel Dui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: redhat-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 03 Jul 2003 16:29:23 +0100
Subject: RH9 home networking
> Here is my problem:
>
> I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects
> to a cable modem and the o
"redhat mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: RH9 home networking
> On 3 Jul 2003, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> >
?)
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: RE: RH9 home networking
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Micha
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:57, Kent Borg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:45:25AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> > Most cable systems won't allow that to work. I work for a cable
> > company, and we only allow 1 MAC address to be associated with the cable
> > modem. Our system won't let that
On 3 Jul 2003, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> >
> > > Here is my problem:
> > >
> > > I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
> > > cable modem and the other to a hub. I would
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Michael Kalus wrote:
> > why are you making this so difficult? why not have the cable
> > modem go to the hub, and let the hosts all plug into the hub?
> > that's what we're doing here, and it's pretty easy.
> >
> > unless you have a static IP for that first box and want i
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> Or, you could buy a $50 US Dlink Cable/DSL NAT firewall Router that will
> give you as many IP's as you want, packet filtering protection, and not eat
> up your CPU cycles. :)
>
> http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=62
yes, by george, that man's got
Thanks for your message, but the computer is already there up and
running. I am asking how to configure it to share the connection with
other machines.
-daniel
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 16:34, James Pifer wrote:
> IMHO you should use a dedicated system for sharing your internet
> connection. All you
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 16:45, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> >
> > > Here is my problem:
> > >
> > > I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
> > > cable modem and the other to
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:45:25AM -0400, Michael Gargiullo wrote:
> Most cable systems won't allow that to work. I work for a cable
> company, and we only allow 1 MAC address to be associated with the cable
> modem. Our system won't let that work at all. I know comcast is the
> same way, and I
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "redhat mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: RH9 home networking
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> >
> > > Here i
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 11:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
>
> > Here is my problem:
> >
> > I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
> > cable modem and the other to a hub. I would like to share the Internet
> > connection with other
> why are you making this so difficult? why not have the cable
> modem go to the hub, and let the hosts all plug into the hub?
> that's what we're doing here, and it's pretty easy.
>
> unless you have a static IP for that first box and want it to
> be visible to the net, that is.
There might
On 3 Jul 2003, Daniel Dui wrote:
> Here is my problem:
>
> I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
> cable modem and the other to a hub. I would like to share the Internet
> connection with other computers in the house.
>
> I was hoping to find a "share connection
This is a very simple IPTABLES/NAT config. It offers almost no firewall
protection.
Check www.netfilter.org to write more rules to protect yourself better.
type iptables-restore
then enter the following (copy and paste is ok)(Remove the >
> # Generated by iptables-save v1.2.7a on Thu Jul 3 1
IMHO you should use a dedicated system for sharing your internet
connection. All you need is a pretty low end desktop and you can load
any number of prebuilt products, such as Smoothwall or IPCop. There are
tons of others too.
I use IPCop and had it installed in about 15 minutes the first time on
ion rather easily
without the need of getting into the "nitty gritty" of it.
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Dui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:29 AM
> To: redhat-list
> Subject: RH9 home networking
>
>
> Here i
Here is my problem:
I have a RH9 box with two network cards. One network card connects to a
cable modem and the other to a hub. I would like to share the Internet
connection with other computers in the house.
I was hoping to find a "share connection" tick box somewhere in the
network configuratio
if you reboot your RH8 your ifconfig -a output show
your 10.x.x.x IP o you must run ifconfig lo YOUR-IP
after rebooting your RH8?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > I'm a Linux
networking newbie, but I've spent quite
> a few hours googling and
> going through howto's so
I'm a Linux networking newbie, but I've spent quite a few hours googling and
going through howto's so thought I would now try here. I have a redhat 9 box
and a redhat 8 laptop. The redhat 9 is online and working find (gets it's ip
address from the cable modem.) I'
I'm working on and experimenting with a new setup with home network
and also changing over from dsl to cable. Right now I have both.
What I'm after right now is a way to set up networking on both
outgoing networks from the same machine. And I have some thing in
place that does most
Hi there,
I have a slightly complicated to explain networking problem. I have a
laptop with redhat 9 installed, that connects to the network in one of
three ways.
a) With a netgear wireless NIC (at home) -- eth1
b) With the built in NIC (at home) -- eth0
c) Via a PPPoE and PPTP connection
Anyone out there a wireless networking guru? I need help. :)
I just got a refurb dell laptop and I installed RH 7.3 on it. I am trying
to get a SMC Wireless PCMCIA card installed on it, but I can't get the
instructions SMC sent me to work right. According to the instructions, a
modu
It's o.k.,
I have it sorted now. Will have a couple of questions later on, but for
now, forget the below message.
regards Greg
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 20:54, greg wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have recently set up two computers, with the aim of networking. Both
> computers have 2
Hi list,
I have recently set up two computers, with the aim of networking. Both
computers have 2 nic cards in them. My main pc, has onboard intel lan,
and one realtek nic, the second has two realtek nics. Both are
networked in windows xp no problems, and both are accessing the internet
as well
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I was thinking that possibly this could be done through the use of
> ports. Something like, telnetting to the main machines' IP address plus
> a port number. (IP#xxx.xxx.xxx:8700) Each machine with their own port
> number.
Yup. I'm pretty sure firestar
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Ted Gervais wrote:
> I was thinking that possibly this could be done through the use of ports.
> Something like, telnetting to the main machines' IP address plus a port
> number. (IP#xxx.xxx.xxx:8700) Each machine with their own port number.
>
> Does anyone have any thoug
I wonder if this is possible. I have three computers which are networked
together using a switch. I want to be able to telnet/ssh or ftp to anyone of
them remotely. I also want others to be able to do the same.
For the first machine this would be possible because it has an ip address. But
th
I'm encountering an intriguing problem with a recent set of RH
installs. The problem is occurring with the RH7.3 and RH8.0
platforms. Let me describe the situation.
The machine I'm using for the RH7.3 and RH8.0 installs is a DELL
Inspiron 8000. I've had no problems with this laptop when
runni
Jeffrey,
You are a star! I had the same problem a couple of days ago (on a T23). Your fix solved the problem on my machine as well. Thanks to you and Ben Russo for your help.
Peter
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 11:21, Eric Ladner wrote:
Bingo..
Many thanks, Jeffrey!
Eric
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 20:
Bingo..
Many thanks, Jeffrey!
Eric
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 20:01, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 01:02:41PM -0600, Eric Ladner wrote:
> > I have an IBM T23 laptop that worked just dandy under 7.2 for over a
> > year, then I did a clean install of RH 8.0.
> >
> > Now, periodicall
It stops working under normal circumstances. No sleep required.
ifconfig eth0 reports a healty interface.
I do see lines like this in the messages file when it stops working:
(date) hostname kernel: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
(sometimes this message is repeated many times)
That seems
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 01:02:41PM -0600, Eric Ladner wrote:
> I have an IBM T23 laptop that worked just dandy under 7.2 for over a
> year, then I did a clean install of RH 8.0.
>
> Now, periodically, the machine will forget about the built int network
> card (IBM eepro100).
>
> When it works, ev
Eric Ladner said:
> I have an IBM T23 laptop that worked just dandy under 7.2 for over a year,
> then I did a clean install of RH 8.0.
>
> Now, periodically, the machine will forget about the built int network
> card (IBM eepro100).
how does it forget? and is there any similar set of circumstances
I have an IBM T23 laptop that worked just dandy under 7.2 for over a
year, then I did a clean install of RH 8.0.
Now, periodically, the machine will forget about the built int network
card (IBM eepro100).
When it works, everything works great. When it stops, I can't ping
anything except the loca
00:33:05 -0800 (PST)
Subject: RE: Networking
> Cannon, Andrew said:
> > Okay, sorry about that. To clarify, I've got 4 computers each is set up
> > with IP addresses ending in 1, 2, 3 or 4. The subnet is 255.255.255.255.
> > Now, 2, 3 and 4 will ping and rlogin to 1 and 1 can p
Cannon, Andrew said:
> Okay, sorry about that. To clarify, I've got 4 computers each is set up
> with IP addresses ending in 1, 2, 3 or 4. The subnet is 255.255.255.255.
> Now, 2, 3 and 4 will ping and rlogin to 1 and 1 can ping/rlogin to 2, 3
> and 4. BUT, 2, 3 and 4 won't ping or rlogin to each o
TED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networking
> Yes, that's what I don't understand. They have all got the right IP
> addresses and they are all on the same subnet. They just don't want to
talk
> to each other. I'm going to try
correct. This last P.S. has confused me. OR you are
confused.
SMB has NOTHING to do with IP Networking, and EVERYTHING to do with Windows
networking. I've never used NIS.
Now the real question is: What EXACTLY do you mean 'talk to each other'?
Talking to each other is as simple as us
blem with the
switch...
Thanks for the help.
Andy
P.S. Do they have to be on the same workgroup, and have them all running NIS
SMB etc?
-Original Message-
From: Ruchit Khimasia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: N
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:42 PM
Subject: Networking
> Okay, this is a really stupid question, but I am now getting really
annoyed
> with myself (and the computers!) I've got 4 PII computers on a s
en restart xinetd and you
should be cool.
<>
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
-- Original Message ---
From: "Cannon, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:42:32 -00
Okay, this is a really stupid question, but I am now getting really annoyed
with myself (and the computers!) I've got 4 PII computers on a single 5 port
Ethernet switch. I'm running RH8.0 but I can't get them to talk to each
other. When I installed RH I installed all computers using the "Server"
op
I'm having some networking problems on a Dell (Latitude C600) laptop
with onboard ethernet and pcmcia wireless (linksys).
Here is my problem, after random amounts of time I loose my ability to
connect to (or ping) anything (except myself which doesn't do me a lot
of good). I do not be
ield both
from the Internet. Either setup Linux to do it or buy yourself a cable/DSL
router to.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Larry Kemp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:09:54 -0600
Subject: Samba - XP Networking Book R
hoping to find a good book designed to take
> someone step by step through the networking
> process. I went to my local computer store and
> find several books but at $20-$50 a pop, I don't
> want to build a useless library. So can anyone
> recommend a book?
>
> Larry Kemp
Hello all,
I am a LINUX newbie and am trying to build a home
network. I have a XP machine and a Redhat 8.0
machine hanging off the same router. Each
connects to the internet via my DSL modem. I was
hoping to find a good book designed to take
someone step by step through the networking
process
At 16:59 28.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>Unfortunaely all the logins have administrator rights, so that might
>work. I'll try that in a bit and let you all (the list) know how it goes.
[snip]
Isn't this th
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
At 23:01 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
Well, it does a little. It'd help even more if I could start whatever
server XP is blabbing about when I go to share the folder on the XP box
I'm wanting. Looks as if man smbc
At 23:01 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>Well, it does a little. It'd help even more if I could start whatever
>server XP is blabbing about when I go to share the folder on the XP box
>I'm wanting. Looks as if man smbclient is just gonna be pure
Rodney Fulk wrote:
In order to access shared drives on an XP machine you will likely need to
add a user to the XP machine. (Not the machine name but the username logged
in as that will be accessing the drive.)
There are 7 user accounts on the computer atm.
--
Joseph A Nagy Jr
Founder and
On Behalf Of Joseph A Nagy Jr
> Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:05 p.m.
> To: redhat-list
> Subject: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
>
>
> I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
> enable file sharing on the XP
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
> At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
> [snip]
>
>>I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
XP computer to the Linux box.
-
At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
>enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
>XP computer to the Linux box.
[snip]
002 11:05 AM
To: redhat-list
Subject: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
XP computer to the Linux box.
Is this at all possib
me friends indicated that this would
> be impossible but I'm not so sure that is impossible.
>
> I've searched both Google and TLDP.org for "Networking WinXP and RH7.2
> via Linksys DSL/Cable Router" and both return nothing, but then again it
> could be my query strin
not so sure that is impossible.
I've searched both Google and TLDP.org for "Networking WinXP and RH7.2
via Linksys DSL/Cable Router" and both return nothing, but then again it
could be my query string is too refined. *shrugs*
TIA
--
Joseph A Nagy Jr
Founder and Partner
Joseph
Some time ago, OReilly had a Linux Networking book, don't know how uptodate
it is. As the other posters say, the HOW-TO's and the Red Hat books look
good.
HTH
smbinyon
-Original Message-
From: Asish Balakrishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1
book by comer on networks programming.i is of grewat help when
designing a tcp/ip stack.
Regards,
BAlakrishnan Asish
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Patrick Beart wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm taking a Linux Networking class at my local Community
> College, whose Web site and general Intern
:
> On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 20:06, Patrick Beart wrote:
> > Folks:
> >
> > I'm taking a Linux Networking class at my local Community
> > College, whose Web site and general Internet decisions tend to be
> > poor. They've chosen a book for th
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 20:06, Patrick Beart wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm taking a Linux Networking class at my local Community
> College, whose Web site and general Internet decisions tend to be
> poor. They've chosen a book for the course that may
Folks:
I'm taking a Linux Networking class at my local Community
College, whose Web site and general Internet decisions tend to be
poor. They've chosen a book for the course that may, or may not, be
ideal.
Wondering what folks would recommend as possibly the
&
his as well:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> now all i have to do is figure out DNAT and actually impliment security. :)
> thanks for your help!
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:57 AM
> Subject: Re:
-
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: networking not working
> wonderful!
> it works!
> ...sort of
>
> now i my gateway can see the world
> and my webserver can see the gateway
> but my webserver CAN'T see the world
> and the world CAN'T see
icy OUTPUT ACCEPT
iptables --policy FORWARD ACCEPT
iptables -t nat --policy PREROUTING ACCEPT
iptables -t nat --policy OUTPUT ACCEPT
iptables -t nat --policy POSTROUTING ACCEPT
- Original Message -
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 1:29 AM
Subject: Re: networking not working
> >
The uplink port is meant for linking hubs together. If you must use it
for an actual computer connection, you need either a button on the hub
that will turn the uplink port into a normal port or, barring that, a
crossover cable.
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, daniel wrote:
> i'm trying to set up my lit
> now i'm not even concerned with actual software yet... at the moment, i
> can't even get the lights on my hub to light up for the connection from my
> gateway to the hub. where are the cables supposed to plug into the hub?
> right now i have the cable from the gateway going into the "uplink"
p
i'm trying to set up my little home network here and i can't even get out of
the gate... here's a quick diagram of my setup:
cableModem
|
|
gatewayBox
|
|
linksysHub
|
|
+--+
| |
| |
| webServer
|
|
windowsMachine
now i'm not even concerned with actual s
oaded.
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Wenk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:36 AM
Subject: networking - neighborhood table
> i am currently running red hat 6.2 i recently installed a compatible
> ethernet c
i am currently running red hat 6.2 i recently installed a compatible
ethernet card and ran the required programs... assigned ip addresses.. when
i ping another computer on the network i get a message saying neighborhood
table overflow... i have searched on google and the red hat sight but i do
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 04:40:06PM +0200, Patrick Lankhorst wrote:
>
> I'm using the complete series written by Craig Hunt.
> There are 7 books in the series:
>
> Samba
> Security
> NFS and Automounter
> DNS
> Apache
> Sendmail
> Another one, I can't remember right now.
TCP/IP Network Administ
complete series written by Craig Hunt.
> There are 7 books in the series:
>
> Samba
> Security
> NFS and Automounter
> DNS
> Apache
> Sendmail
> Another one, I can't remember right now.
>
> These are very good books (in my opinion), and not too expensive
>
> &q
wrote:
> What is a really good Linux networking book that would cover a lot of
> information in detail
>
> or would it be better to just get books per subject.
DNS and BIND , Paul Albitz and Cricket Liu, O'Reilly Books Samba ,
O'Reilly Books
You can download Samba from the we
"Michael S. Dunsavage" wrote:
> What is a really good Linux networking book that would cover a lot of
> information in detail
>
> or would it be better to just get books per subject.
DNS and BIND , Paul Albitz and Cricket Liu, O'Reilly Books
Samba , O'Reilly Bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-Jun-2002/01:44 -0700, "Michael S. Dunsavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is a really good Linux networking book that would cover a lot of
>information in detail
The best books I've seen are those from O
What is a really good Linux networking book that would cover a lot of
information in detail
or would it be better to just get books per subject.
I.E
DNS
mail server (pop3, smtp, etc)
Apache (vhosts, etc)
and such
any suggestions for either above scenarios would be greatly appreciated
Hi,
We have an internet server running RH7.0 and i created another server for
dial-up using ppp/mgetty and the Dial-up server(RH7.2) works fine with
win98/w2k client they can connect and browse the internet. my problem is
that when i installed another box(RH7.2) This box can connect to the Dialin
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo