Well, I'm trying to install RH 9.0 on a laptop.
Problem 1: no internal CD - it's a PCMCIA
So, I set up NSF on my main system, and having d/l the three ISOs, I've
mounted and exported them. The laptop has a port replicator, which (happy,
happy, joy, joy) has a NIC in it.
I've booted off the fl
I believe the README on the CD contains the instructions.
Jamin W. Collins
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Hogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 7.0 nfs install problem
-Original Message-
From: Leonard den
-Original Message-
From: Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, November 20, 2000 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: 7.0 nfs install problem
Hi Jeff,
> As I understand it, you need to have the contents of both cd
have the contents of both cd's in a
> directory together to do an nfs install. There's a link on redhat's website
> that talks about that. I think the 7.0 installation book talks about it
> too. I had this problem when I downloaded the two cd images and tried a few
&
Hi Charles,
> /mnt/cdrom(ro,insecure,all_squash)
Have you used the all_squash option for this kind of install before? Maybe
you should drop it. If I do an NFS install I usually share the CD without any
options (I have no security concerns here at home :) ).
> Nov
Hi Jeff,
> As I understand it, you need to have the contents of both cd's in a
> directory together to do an nfs install.
The CD installation I did only required one CD, so why would the NFS install
require the contents of both CD's to be available?
Assumin
-Original Message-
From: Charles Galpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, November 20, 2000 2:54 PM
Subject: 7.0 nfs install problem
>I'm quite sure I'm doing this correctly, and have tried several
>permutations
Do you have this line in /etc/hosts.allow?
ALL: 192.168.0.
I have two Red Hat 6.1 machines in my network. They're both nfs
servers. They both have this line in their /etc/hosts.allow. Their
local IP addresses are 192.168.0.x. Good luck,
Hidong
Charles Galpin wrote:
>
> I'm q
I'm quite sure I'm doing this correctly, and have tried several
permutations of different values, but it isn't working for me.
This machine (p90) has only 16mb of ram and no cdrom so I can't do an http
or ft install)
Details follow..
On NFS server
o mounted disk1 on /mnt/cdrom - verified it's
.1/6.2 via NFS. Any help would be highly appreciable.
> >
> > I've never tried a NFS install not through PXE. However I believe you
> > have to make a boot disk using the "bootnet.img" image instead of the
> > "boot.img" image. When booting with that
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Martin Gauthier wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me the step by step procedure to install RedHat Linux
> > 5.2/6.1/6.2 via NFS. Any help would be highly appreciable.
>
> I've never tried a NFS install not through PXE. However I believe you
> have to
> Can anyone tell me the step by step procedure to install RedHat Linux
> 5.2/6.1/6.2 via NFS. Any help would be highly appreciable.
I've never tried a NFS install not through PXE. However I believe you
have to make a boot disk using the "bootnet.img" image instead of the
&
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me the step by step procedure to install
RedHat Linux 5.2 / 6.1/6.2 via NFS
Any help would be highly appreciable
Regards
K.Deepak
Martin Gauthier wrote:
> I've setup a PXE-DHCP-NFS Server in order to remotely install RedHat
> Linux on brand new syste
I've setup a PXE-DHCP-NFS Server in order to remotely install RedHat
Linux on brand new system. The installation is using a kickstart file.
Everything is working fine except for on small thing: I have to manually
type-in the "ks" parameter* at the kernel prompt!
How can I specify to the kernel to
I would like to know how can I get the NFS install to work with a madge TR card. I
have the
drivers (mtok.o) for it but the bootnet.img does not contain it. Is there a way to
build a
bootnet.img with the madge driver included.
Thanks
--
Abdallah A. Al-Humaid
Comp & Comm Sys Dept.
Tel: 9
Bill Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 Apr 2000, Brady Montz wrote:
>
> > In my case, the NFS servers were linux machines. I have two linux
> > machines, and tried NFS upgrades in both directions. I had the RedHat dist
> > in /vol/RedHat, /vol being it's own filesystem. /vol is nfs expo
On 5 Apr 2000, Brady Montz wrote:
> In my case, the NFS servers were linux machines. I have two linux machines,
> and tried NFS upgrades in both directions. I had the
> RedHat dist in /vol/RedHat, /vol being it's own filesystem. /vol is nfs
> exported. I confirmed that I could mount /vol from the
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply. Not having a working NFS install is a pain as
> > > kickstart only works with NFS over the net. Guess I will have to wait
> > > for RH to come out with a fixed install disk.
> > >
> > &g
.I guess the next step is to make a Linux box an NFS server
and export from there to see if it works any better.
- rick warner -
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Bill Carlson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Rick Warner wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. Not having a working
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Rick Warner wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. Not having a working NFS install is a pain as
> kickstart only works with NFS over the net. Guess I will have to wait
> for RH to come out with a fixed install disk.
>
> - rick warner -
>
Hey Rick,
Thanks for the reply. Not having a working NFS install is a pain as
kickstart only works with NFS over the net. Guess I will have to wait
for RH to come out with a fixed install disk.
- rick warner -
>
> I've had the exact same problem. I ended up having to set up anonymous ft
Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone get an NFS install of Zoot working? I keep getting an error
> that it cannot mount the directory, yet I can sniff on the NFS server
> and see that it allows the NFS mount. The message windows says it has
> mounted. Yet the in
At 02:57 PM 4/3/00 -0700, you wrote:
>
>Anyone get an NFS install of Zoot working? I keep getting an error
>that it cannot mount the directory, yet I can sniff on the NFS server
>and see that it allows the NFS mount. The message windows says it has
>mounted. Yet the install pr
Anyone get an NFS install of Zoot working? I keep getting an error
that it cannot mount the directory, yet I can sniff on the NFS server
and see that it allows the NFS mount. The message windows says it has
mounted. Yet the install program pops up a window saying it cannot
mount that
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 05:55:08PM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
| yes, providing the other machine runs *nix you can install via nfs. I have
| not done it myself, but you can also do installs via http and smb (if the
| other PCs are windows).
Well I have done it. Works just fine. Make a floppy wi
yes, providing the other machine runs *nix you can install via nfs. I have
not done it myself, but you can also do installs via http and smb (if the
other PCs are windows).
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Mark A. Zottola wrote:
> I have a K6-3 450 that I has Redhat6.0 installed. As I did not do the
> insta
I have a K6-3 450 that I has Redhat6.0 installed. As I did not do the
install myself, there were several features which were lacking. So I
would like to deal with the mess by upgrading to RH6.1.
Unfortunately this machine does not have a CD-ROM in it. I would like to
mount the CD-ROM on another m
>If you see this and happen to know the correct bug report address will
> you forward it on the the RH team? Thanks! Also, if you succeeded at
> doing an NFS install from another RH5 box, or another UNIX using the same
> tcpd conpiletime options, let me know how you did it...
I can't find the bug report email address _anywhere_ on the RH home
page, so I'm just going to post it here and hope someone at RedHat takes
notice.
OK, if you attempt to do an NFS install off of another RH 5 box the
client install program fails because of an authentication
29 matches
Mail list logo
