Re: Complete software list for a mail server on Redhat

2003-09-12 Thread Robert Stoeber
At 02:10 AM 9/12/2003, you wrote: Hi , I want to set up a mail server on Redhat Linux 9 with Postfix as MTA. I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the software that I need to setup a complete mail server. (IMAP/POP). I'll be grateful if you can point me to some links for configu

Complete software list for a mail server on Redhat

2003-09-12 Thread Peram's List
Hi , I want to set up a mail server on Redhat Linux 9 with Postfix as MTA. I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the software that I need to setup a complete mail server. (IMAP/POP). I'll be grateful if you can point me to some links for configuration too. Regards, Peram -- r

Re: Mail server on Redhat Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Martin Marques
El Jue 11 Sep 2003 09:50, Peram's List escribió: > Hi, > Im looking to setup a mail server. I'd appreciate if you can let me know > what are all the software that I need to know to set up an IMAP/POP > server. I have the option of setting up Exchange but I dont want to do >

Mail server on Redhat Linux

2003-09-11 Thread Peram's List
Hi, Im looking to setup a mail server. I'd appreciate if you can let me know what are all the software that I need to know to set up an IMAP/POP server. I have the option of setting up Exchange but I dont want to do that, I'm looking for a groupware software on Redhat. I know that Po

Re: Anti Vrus for Linux mail server

2003-08-29 Thread Distribution Lists
equirement of anti virus packages : >> >> FREE Anti Virus Package (any) >> for Linux 7.3 >> for Mail server qpopper >> need rpm package >> > > f-prot is very good we've run it on our boxes for ages, and as of 4.2 > (just released) it now scans

Re: Anti Vrus for Linux mail server

2003-08-29 Thread Andre Speelmans
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Res wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Redhat Man wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > Who can provide/info in this requirement of anti virus packages : > > > > FREE Anti Virus Package (any) > > for Linux 7.3 > > for Mail server qpopp

RE: Anti Vrus for Linux mail server

2003-08-29 Thread Chris Mason
My big success in server admin over the last month has been solving this perenial problem. We were getting so much spam and now so many SoBig virii that it wa becoming a huge problem at three sites I am involved in. This is what I did, it's free and works perfectly. **

Re: Anti Vrus for Linux mail server

2003-08-29 Thread Res
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Redhat Man wrote: > Dear All, > > Who can provide/info in this requirement of anti virus packages : > > FREE Anti Virus Package (any) > for Linux 7.3 > for Mail server qpopper > need rpm package > f-prot is very good we've run it on our box

Anti Vrus for Linux mail server

2003-08-29 Thread Redhat Man
Dear All, Who can provide/info in this requirement of anti virus packages : FREE Anti Virus Package (any) for Linux 7.3 for Mail server qpopper need rpm package Thank you for your kind cooperation in advance -- Best regards, Santosh\\ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Postfix mail server and mail relay question

2003-07-16 Thread Jason Williams
Yes. I've recompiled postfix from source on my server. As far as relay, I meant putting up a server on our DMZ and configuring postifx on it to relay email from that server, to the internal mail server. Spamassassin a bad thing? I was told that it was really good and cutting down spam

Re: Postfix mail server and mail relay question

2003-07-16 Thread dch
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 19:10, Jason Williams wrote: > Hello everyone. I wanted to ask a couple of questions I have about setting > up a mail relay as well as setting up a postfix mail server. > > Here is what I want to do. > I am setting up a mail server for our network. It

Postfix mail server and mail relay question

2003-07-16 Thread Jason Williams
Hello everyone. I wanted to ask a couple of questions I have about setting up a mail relay as well as setting up a postfix mail server. Here is what I want to do. I am setting up a mail server for our network. It is going to run Postifx as well as spamassassin. I have found a couple of

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-20 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
I would go with Postfix. It is the best mail server I've ever used. Very secure. Also very fast. Jon On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Håkon Eriksen wrote: > > > > Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > > &g

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-20 Thread Håkon Eriksen
ecure. And fast. But I would never call it easy to set up. To answer the original poster's question, there's a tool called redhat-switchmail which makes the transition from Sendmail to Postfix rather smooth (or so I've heard, I've never tried it myself). My recommendation is t

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-20 Thread rm
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On that note, i want to do the same... > > are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and > still reliable? > > Anton You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html It's not exact

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-20 Thread Zoki
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On that note, i want to do the same... > > are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and > still reliable? > > Anton *** Postfix seems to be the "other" standard. I haven't come around to acrtua

Re: replacement mail server

2003-06-11 Thread Ben Russo
Richard Humphrey wrote: I am setting up a replacement mail server to stand in for a few days while I upgrade our production server. I have copied the group, passwd, and shadow files over to the new machine. Do i need to copy anything else over? We use ipop3 to collect our mail. Do i need to make

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-11 Thread Aly Dharshi
sday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup On that note, i want to do the same... are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and still reliable? Anton On Tuesday 10 Jun 2003 5:47 pm, Zoki wrote: Le 05/06/2003 13:05, « Cowles, Steve »

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-11 Thread Andrew Williams
ednesday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM > Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup > > > > On that note, i want to do the same... > > > > are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set > up, and > > still reliable? > > > > Anton > > &

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-11 Thread Ramesh .T.S
use qmail -- www.qmail.org - Original Message - From: "Anton Piatek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:18 PM Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup > On that note, i want to do the same... > > are there any easier al

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-11 Thread Anton Piatek
--Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM > >> Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup > >> > >> Just : > >> > >> mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server > > > > J

replacement mail server

2003-06-11 Thread Richard Humphrey
I am setting up a replacement mail server to stand in for a few days while I upgrade our production server. I have copied the group, passwd, and shadow files over to the new machine. Do i need to copy anything else over? We use ipop3 to collect our mail. Do i need to make sure each user has a file

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-10 Thread Zoki
Le 05/06/2003 13:05, « Cowles, Steve » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM >> Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup >> >> Just : >> >> mail IN

RE: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-05 Thread Cowles, Steve
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:28 AM > Subject: Re: E-Mail Server Setup > > Just : > > mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server Just??? Your only adding an address record for your ma

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-05 Thread edwardspl
Just : mailIN A 111.222.333.444 ; IP_Address of Mail Server /etc/mail/local-host-names: #domain_name_of _your_mail_server Mark Foster wrote: > If you want to accept mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], you will want at > least (something like) the following in your domain.co.u

Re: E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-05 Thread Mark Foster
sendmail (service sendmail restart) and you should be good to go. Hope this helps. -mark On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 08:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would appreciate it if someone can explain how to set up RH9Pro as an e-mail > server. > > www.domain.co.uk > ip 111.222.333.444 &g

E-Mail Server Setup

2003-06-05 Thread liam . meadows
I would appreciate it if someone can explain how to set up RH9Pro as an e-mail server. www.domain.co.uk ip 111.222.333.444 What records does my ISP need and what records settings are needed on RH9Pro. I am a bit of a Linux newbie and DNS is a total mystery at the moment. I have been using

RE: Configure secondary mail server

2003-04-03 Thread santosh kumar
Want to configure secondary mail server to switch instantly in case of primary mail server crashes. The primary mail server is configured with fetch mail. Please anyone advice any links or steps to configure secondary mail server.. Thanks in advance.. Thanks & Regds, santosh -Orig

RE: Configure secondary mail server

2003-04-03 Thread santosh kumar
Hi, Need to configure a 2nd mail server to swich instantly in case of 1st server crashes.. Regds, santosh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoki Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 7:22 PM To: rhlist Subject: Re: Configure secondary mail server

Re: Configure secondary mail server

2003-04-02 Thread Zoki
Le 01/04/2003 11:05, « santosh kumar » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi folks, > > Can any one tell me how to configure secondary mail server to > fetch mail. Right now have a POP3 mail server which is configured with > fetchmail so I > want to configure another

RE: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3 --Solved!

2003-04-01 Thread Gavin Mellors
domain for wich my mail server is responsible. in VER 5.2 it was set in /etc/mail/sendmail.? In version 8.0 it is set in /etc/mail/local-host-names Thanks for the input. My first time on any mailing list and I am impressed by what can be achieved, with everone contributing. The sum of the parts

Configure secondary mail server

2003-04-01 Thread santosh kumar
Hi folks, Can any one tell me how to configure secondary mail server for fetch mail. Right now have a POP3 mail server which is configured with fetchmail so want to configure another mail server as a backup , which could be helpful in case of primary mail server crash. Waiting for valuable

Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-04-01 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 16:29, Edward Dekkers wrote: > >From memory you can just type IMAP instead of POP3 there? Or am I > misunderstanding your question? > --- > Edward Dekkers (Director) Depends on the version of Outlook Express - most versions allow you to choose an IMAP server along with heaps

RE: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-03-31 Thread Gavin Mellors
Hi Edward You are right, when setting up a new mail account with outlook express the option of "pop3", "imap" or "http" protocols are presented in a drop down list by the wizard; under select INCOMING MAIL SERVER. Will try this! With an existing account, it does

Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-03-31 Thread Edward Dekkers
> With regards IMAP, I did consider it, but how do I set up my outlook > express clients to receive there mail using IMAP ? > Under my clients O/Express->Account settings->Connection->server > types->incoming server: only "POP3" (PORT 110) option is availible > Does IMAP also use port 110 ?? >From

RE: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-03-31 Thread Gavin Mellors
n -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Russo Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3 Gavin Mellors wrote: >Hi All > >I am managing a mail server (midterm newbie)

Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-03-31 Thread Ben Russo
Gavin Mellors wrote: Hi All I am managing a mail server (midterm newbie). Server is an Intel Brownsville m/board, 256K Ram. Clients all using O/Express to get mail of POP server. Previous version of Redhat 5.2 and 7.0; had a special user group "popuser". When running userconf I could

Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3

2003-03-31 Thread Gavin Mellors
Hi All I am managing a mail server (midterm newbie). Server is an Intel Brownsville m/board, 256K Ram. Clients all using O/Express to get mail of POP server. Previous version of Redhat 5.2 and 7.0; had a special user group "popuser". When running userconf I could create my users as

Re: POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

2003-03-25 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 14:59, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > Hello, > > I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. IIRC, > redhat used to have a pop server included, but a search on the redhat cd does > not help me (RH 7.3). If you did the default ins

Re: POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

2003-03-25 Thread Joe Polk
It comes with imap. Look for imap2000 I think on the 7.3 CD. Be sure to enable it in /etc/xinetd.d/ipop3 once you install it. <> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 22:59, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > Hello, > > I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. II

POP mail server - can't find the one shipped with RH 7.3

2003-03-25 Thread Reuben D. Budiardja
Hello, I need to set up a pop mail server. I currently use sendmail as the MTA. IIRC, redhat used to have a pop server included, but a search on the redhat cd does not help me (RH 7.3). The pop mail server will be just for a light weight use, let's say less than 10 users, and the user

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-05 Thread Joe Polk
separate machine for mail, you could let it stay outside and running firewall rules on it and only open mail ports. This would involve a separate box, however. If your mail server is going to have both an internal IP and an external IP, then you will need 2 nics to do it right. That assumes that your not

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-05 Thread Daniel Tan
do i need to have a router if my mail server itself is having the public ip? this is my 1st time trying to configure a system to have a public ip so might need some help on this. do i need 2 network cards?? 1 for internal ip and the other for external ip currently my mail server is filtering

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-05 Thread Daniel Tan
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:26 PM Subject: Re: Help in managing own mail server If you have a sendmail server, then you should be fine. You can add pop3 if you like (i.e. have the need). You'll definitely want a firewall, ideally a separate box altogether or maybe

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-04 Thread nate
nate said: > need this(I've run my email w/o a secondary MX for 5 years w/o any > problems, longest outage was about 3 days due to premature disconnection > by my telco) funny, as I wrote the above my ISP had an outage.. 8:48PM - 9:44PM PST.. didn't even realize it till a few minutes later..the e

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-04 Thread nate
Daniel Tan said: > What are the things (concerns) that i should do to port the server over to > my office? > 1) From what i know, need to get public IP (which will then be opened up > to everyone - insecure) only need 1 public ip. IDEALLY the mail server should have it's own p

Re: Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-04 Thread Joe Polk
unless you just are jazzed to get Exchange. Setting up a Linux mail server is very simple to do and they run very well and with little need for intervention, save updating and general maintenance. Exchange is database-based. The information stores for Exchange are very high-maintenance and requ

Help in managing own mail server

2003-03-04 Thread Daniel Tan
Hi, need to have some in depth knowledge on concerns that i should have if i want to do the below mentioned? Problem: My company currently uses an internal mail server (Red Hat 7.0). Also using external mail server from ISP. Thinking of hosting our own mail server either using the existing

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
I like Postfix. Postfix is: super-easy to configure very secure (Wietse Venema is one of the security gurus) supported by IBM very, very fast compatible with Sendmail alias files and command-line Jon On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Christian Campbell wrote: > I have intermediate experience with Linux

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread gabriel
sendmail is great. it's what handles most of the world's mail and there's a reason for it. configurability and security used to be issues with it, but it's been solid for a long time now. On February 28, 2003 01:55 pm, Christian Campbell wrote: > I have intermediate experience with Linux. Eve

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Jeffrey Tadlock
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:55:20PM -0500, Christian Campbell wrote: > I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers. > I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as > our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or >

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Deleo Paulo Ribeiro Junior
> Christian Campbell wrote: > | I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers. > | I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as > | our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use > postfix or > | sendmail (or something else).

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 12:55, Christian Campbell wrote: > I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as > our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or > sendmail (or something else). Anyone have any pros/cons to either of these? Either/or

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:55:20PM -0500, Christian Campbell wrote: > I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers. > I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as > our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or >

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Joe Polk
You'll get lots of advise. I like sendmail. It's easy to configure too. You can use Webmin also to make it even easier. You can cut down on spam by using rbl's and/or add SpamAssassin. <> On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:55, Christian Campbell wrote: > I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even les

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread nate
on all messages DRAMATICALLY increases the load on the system. Probably by a factor of 500 or more. My home mail server is a p3-800 1GB ram with dual 100GB WD(8mb cache) drives in raid1, and it takes on average 3-5 seconds to deliver a message, it can take much longer if the message is really big

Re: Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Francisco Neira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Campbell wrote: | I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers. | I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as | our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix o

Mail Server

2003-02-28 Thread Christian Campbell
I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers. I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or sendmail (or something else). Anyone have any pros/cons to either of these?

Problems wiht FETCHMAIL on RH mail server

2003-02-17 Thread Stephen Kuhn
I set up an RH 7.3 box with FETCHMAIL/PROCMAIL/SENDMAIL/IMAP and SAMBA for a file server/mail server for a client. The client accesses the internet via ADSL on a Win2k box that "shares" the connection with the rest of the internal network. The machines on the "internal" ne

Re: Mail server(SIMS) virus scanning

2003-02-03 Thread Joshua Schmidlkofer
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:58, tugsuu wrote: > Hi all, > > I need a mail server virus scanning software. We use a SIMS(Sun > Internet Mail Server) on Solaris 7 on Intel platform. I have tryed > several virus scanning software for Solaris 7. But all of them are for > Solaris

Mail server(SIMS) virus scanning

2003-02-03 Thread tugsuu
Hi all, I need a mail server virus scanning software. We use a SIMS(Sun Internet Mail Server) on Solaris 7 on Intel platform. I have tryed several virus scanning software for Solaris 7. But all of them are for Solaris on sparc paltform. Please help me to find a mail server virus scanning

Re: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-13 Thread irwin
On Monday 13 January 2003 07:00 am, you wrote: > > In short, yes you should install and use them all. They compliment each > other. > > Gerry Thank you. Since installing MailScanner less than 24 hours ago, it has already been working hard. I will install Razor and Spamassassin. Irwin --

Re: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-13 Thread Gerry Doris
> RH7.2, kernel-2.4.18-19.7, sendmail-8.11.6-3 > > I installed MailScanner and F-Prot from the rpm's, and it seemed to go > without any problem. Here is what I don't understand. > > Razor, spamsassassin, and MailScanner all seem to check for spam. Are > they different and should all be used? If

Re: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-12 Thread irwin
On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:33 pm, you wrote: ~ > I suggest that you make sure you have your mail server working properly. > Next install razor and then spamsassassin. Those should go in very easily. > This will take care of flagging spam. Next you should check out >

RE: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-12 Thread Michael Pelley
] Subject: mail server virus scanning I have a friend who has asked me to help them replace the Windoze2000 server in their office with a Linux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming email on the server and

Re: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-12 Thread Aly Dharshi
nux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail > > server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming > > email on the server and I've never done that before... > > > > I've found several projects at freshmeat that claim to work wit

Re: mail server virus scanning

2003-01-12 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Michael George wrote: > I have a friend who has asked me to help them replace the Windoze2000 server > in their office with a Linux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail > server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming

mail server virus scanning

2003-01-12 Thread Michael George
I have a friend who has asked me to help them replace the Windoze2000 server in their office with a Linux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming email on the server and I've never done that before...

Re: Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-20 Thread Jerry Winegarden
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Joe Wittmer wrote: > I am new to the list, a linux newbee, and trying to learn how to setup a > mail/webserver. Are there any web tutorials out there that can assist me? > Any pointers in the right direction are greatly appreciated. > > What my ISP is promising to give me is:

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-19 Thread Mikevl
November 2002 06:50 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server Really, to what extent? Does LDAP provide complete GAL entry details (i.e. Dept, phone numbers, etc...) and in a timely manner? When we investigated the feasibility of replacing Outloo

Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Nov-2002/12:50 -0500, Dave Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Really, to what extent? Does LDAP provide complete GAL entry details (i.e. >Dept, phone numbers, etc...) and in a timely manner? In my last job, LDAP had as much info as there was.

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Dave Chappell
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Nov-2002/08:13 -0500, Dave Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >One thing you will not be

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread sentinel
That's one of the reasons I'm using crossover office with outlook for Linux. So far it's working pretty good. I recommend contacting them for an eval of the product. The problems I've run into a minor. So far I've discovered a problem with spell checker crashing outlook when running office 20

Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Nov-2002/08:13 -0500, Dave Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >One thing you will not be able to do is access the Global Address List via >IMAP or POP3. The Exchange server can run LDAP to provide access to the GAL. Tony -BEGIN PGP SIGNATU

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Chapman, Matt
ject: Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server > > > babar haq wrote: > > >is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux 8.0 from > >microsoft exchange server 5.0 > > > > > > > If the Exchange box is running Outlook Web Ac

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Rechenberg, Andrew
ab names out of the GAL. Hope this helps. Andy. -Original Message- From: Gordon McDowall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:42 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server You can also get a plug in

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Gordon McDowall
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server babar haq wrote: >is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux 8.0 from microsoft exchange server 5.0 > > > If the Exchange box is running Outlook Web Access, just point a brow

Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Alan Peery
babar haq wrote: is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux 8.0 from microsoft exchange server 5.0 If the Exchange box is running Outlook Web Access, just point a browser to http://box_with_exchange/exchange... Alan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Sebastiao Santos
hi all, Considering that I obtain to use the Microsoft exchange with customers linux, I would obtain to use the customers linux with public address-book resource? tks, On Segunda Novembro 18 2002 10:54, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1

RE: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Dave Chappell
: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Nov-2002/06:42 -0500, babar haq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux

Re: using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Nov-2002/06:42 -0500, babar haq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux 8.0 from >microsoft exchange server 5.0 If the Exchange server is running IMAP or POP3, you can read the mail using Netscape Mes

using linux for microsoft exchange 5.0 mail server

2002-11-18 Thread babar haq
is there anyway i can access my mails in red hat linux 8.0 from microsoft exchange server 5.0 -- ___ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-14 Thread Jake Colman
EW> - fetchmail on the Linux system gets the mail from the ISP. I EW> schedule EW> this via cron. EW> - MTA (sendmail in my case) EW> - Fetchmail can automatically kick things over to sendmail EW> - Sendmail automatically runs procmail EW> - Procmail does my filter

Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I'm not set on how to achieve dial on demand functionality. Might pick up on advice from Edward Dekkers to use a combination of wvdial and pppd, although diald looks good in principle. Like I said, don't get me wrong - I LOVE diald. Just haven't been able to get it working on recent versions of

Re: Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-06 Thread Jim Hale
Hey - No Sweat! :) I've been using this system for about 6 months now and have not had ANY problems (that I didn't cause) ;) Jim Hale --- 'The OS Tells The PC What To Do With Itself" - Me, 1990 --- Visit Our MIDI & Digital Audio Website at http://hale.dyndns.org or Our Forums At http://haleforum.

Re: Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-06 Thread Joe Wittmer
Jim, Thanks! It looks like this is what I need. I am downloading it now and will give it a try. Joe >There's a GOOD 'All-In-One' way that you can do that since you're a new >person to Linux. I am STILL new to Linux, but setting up a box with SME >Server (http://www.e-smith.org - based on RH)

Re: Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-06 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Joe Wittmer wrote: > _ POP/SMTP servers for Windows Clients > _ Apache Webserver > _ FTP server > _ Telnet access (atleast initially) > _ Webmail (possibly if not difficult) Red Hat 8.0 does all of that. Read the manuals from Red Hat (available online), and make sure you've a

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Roland Hill
From: Gary [mailto:gary-list-redhat@;mygirlfriday.info] Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 6:24 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS] On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeab

Re: Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-06 Thread Jim Hale
There's a GOOD 'All-In-One' way that you can do that since you're a new person to Linux. I am STILL new to Linux, but setting up a box with SME Server (http://www.e-smith.org - based on RH) allows you to do all the below that you're looking for. Then as you're learning how to set everything up, you

Web/Mail Server Tutorial

2002-11-06 Thread Joe Wittmer
Hi Group, I am new to the list, a linux newbee, and trying to learn how to setup a mail/webserver. Are there any web tutorials out there that can assist me? Any pointers in the right direction are greatly appreciated. What my ISP is promising to give me is: _ a block of 5 static IP addresses _ d

Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Gary
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to >those of us who are trying to get up to speed. > > Now for the implementation phase. Well, what did you finally select ?

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Roland Hill
Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to those of us who are trying to get up to speed. Now for the implementation phase. Regards, Roland Hill # This e-mail me

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-05 Thread Hella
Do you have a static IP with your dial-up connection? You need a static so that you can point the MX record for your domain to your Linux box. (unless you are queing the mail somewhere else and sucking it downstream) Once past this hurdle, it is pretty straight forward: Configure your MTA to a

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Edward Dekkers
> -Diald to have dial on demand functionality with the modem OK, every man and his dog has tackled your main problems, I'll tackle this one. I used diald way back on 5.2 and loved it. Upgraded to 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 and it broke at every step and I had to change heaps of configuration. I haven't manage

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Gary
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > > Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on >the following issue. > I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to >receive email, filter the c

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote: > My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA >is configured and operational. > > I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to >receive email, filter the content,

Re: Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Kent Borg
[Oops, in my first attempt at sending this I didn't use my subscribed address. Second try...] On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote: > -MTA (sendmail, postfix, qmail etc) to deliver > [...] > If some applications are more new user friendly than others then > please advise.

Mail Server for home network

2002-11-04 Thread Roland Hill
Hi List, Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on the following issue. My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA is configured and operational. I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I w

Re: Mail server in Red Hat Linux

2002-10-25 Thread Alan Peery
senthil wrote: Read the HOWtos of Fetchmail and Sendmail before u start off then it will be easy !! try also "man fetchmail", and look inside there for info on fetchmailconf, a handy configuration utility. Alan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.co

Re: Mail server in Red Hat Linux

2002-10-24 Thread senthil
will be taken care by procmail. Read the HOWtos of Fetchmail and Sendmail before u start off then it will be easy !! good luck sendhil - Original Message - From: "Rupesh Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:05 PM Subje

  1   2   3   >