> RH7.2, kernel-2.4.18-19.7, sendmail-8.11.6-3
>
> I installed MailScanner and F-Prot from the rpm's, and it seemed to go
> without any problem.  Here is what I don't understand.
>
> Razor, spamsassassin, and MailScanner all seem to check for spam.  Are
> they  different and should all be used?  If so, why?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Irwin

Razor is an excellent database of spam that spamassassin can use to check
incoming mail against.  Spamassassin is a superb program based on a set of
rules to provide points (demerits) to a message depending on how many of
the spam identification rules it matches.  You then set a threshold and
screen out messages that exceed the threshold.

Think of MailScanner as a high level manager of the process.  MailScanner
uses sendmail to receive your messages into an incoming queue.  It then
calls whatever virus scanning engines you've installed to check the
messages for virii.  While it will do its own spam scanning it is
recommneded that you use spamassassin.  MailScanner integrates seamlessly
with it.

If a virus is found MailScanner will do what you want with it (ie
quarintine the message, strip the virus and deliver the message, etc).  If
the message is to be delivered MailScanner dumps it into the outgoing
queue for sendmail for delivery to its final host destination.

In short, yes you should install and use them all.  They compliment each
other.

Gerry




-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to