Ok,
So I check this new computer that came in the other day to see what kind of
filesystem it had set up when Dell sent the computer.
It showed the following:
/dev/sda5 418582916 /
/dev/sd3 101107 /boot
none 1031976 /dev/shm
The computer has 4 , 176 gb hard disks in it and its running under
Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an empty HD 20G format with ext3 but i cant mount it in a
> filesystem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an empty HD 20G format with ext3 but i cant mount it in a
filesystem.
Did you actually run /sbin/mkfs.ext3 on it after you ran fdisk?
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an empty HD 20G format with ext3 but i cant mount it i
ount /dev/hdb1 /app/hdc1/
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
This only works if you have an entry in /etc/fstab for this partition.
Try: mount -t ext2 /dev/hdb1 /app/hdc1
> Runing a fsck in the HD return this message:
> fsck /dev/hdb
This fails because you're tryin
On Monday 13 October 2003 09:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> mount /dev/hdb1 /app/hdc1/
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
>
This only works if you have an entry in /etc/fstab for this partition.
Try: mount -t ext2 /dev/hdb1 /app/hdc1
> Runing a fsc
Hi all,
I have an empty HD 20G format with ext3 but i cant mount it in a
filesystem.
fdisk /dev/hdb -l
Disk /dev/hdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2480 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 1 2480
Ben Russo wrote:
> wondering if there are any known issues relating to filesystem
> corruptions with symptoms similar to mine.
OK, so it is not a brand new system, try setting "idebus=33" at the
end of the kernel line in /boot/grub/grub.conf
and in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, add a line
PIII, 128mb, 80gb.
...
> It seems to me that symptoms of drive or controller problems would not
> repeat in the same files in two different partitionings, so I'm
> wondering if there are any known issues relating to filesystem
> corruptions with symptoms similar to mine.
OK, so it i
e or controller problems would not
repeat in the same files in two different partitionings, so I'm
wondering if there are any known issues relating to filesystem
corruptions with symptoms similar to mine.
Ben Russo wrote:
carlsbad-nick wrote:
I suspected HW the first time, but now that it
carlsbad-nick wrote:
I suspected HW the first time, but now that it's happened again after a
complete reinstall (and manual repartitioning), I'm thinking software
(or user error...) Will appreciate any help or add'l info.
Nick Nichols
Is it the same machine?
Why do you think that doing a fu
My system (RH9 on PIII) worked yesterday, but this morning it failed to
start X. The error is:
Failed to load module "bitmap" (module does not exist, 0)
The log is attached, but I think it's just a symptom of something else,
because
rpm -V XFree86
tells me that several files are missing,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21 Aug 2003 00:13:26 -0400, Vincent E Parsons wrote:
> This is a two part question...
> 1. Does anyone know how to make redhat-config-packages look to the local
> filesystem for packages instead of the CD's? I tried to invoke t
This is a two part question...
1. Does anyone know how to make redhat-config-packages look to the local
filesystem for packages instead of the CD's? I tried to invoke the
following command; redhat-config-packages --tree=/var/rh9 which
fails. Not a valid source...
2. The answer to this que
At 12:57 PM 7/25/03 +0200, you wrote:
>I have one big filesystem for '/home' and '/var/spool/mail'. Is there
>still a way I can quota the mailboxes?
>
>Regards,
>Ivo
>
>
>--
>redhat-list mailing list
>unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
I have one big filesystem for '/home' and '/var/spool/mail'. Is there
still a way I can quota the mailboxes?
Regards,
Ivo
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
I have a problem with default permissions being set on my user directory
on my remote server. The server has an nfs server running on it, so I
mount it via nfs on my desktop computer. The idea is that if I create a
file on my Linux desktop computer in OpenOffice.org, I should be able to
open that
RH 9 on a Thinkpad 600
There were some kppp processes that refused to die, couldn't even be killed by root
after user logout, so a reboot seemed prudent. On the reboot, It asked about a
filesystem integrity check, which failed and told me to fsck manually, which I did. I
got a few "
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:43:01PM +0800, Kevin - KD Micro Software spoke
thusly:
>Everything I've read today says that ext3 zeros the inodes as soon as they
>are deleted, rather than just marking them as deleted but leaving them
>alone. If this was ext2 it would be a lot simpler, but it's not. An
Hello all,
I've spent the last few hours reading articles and various links from Google
on undeleting files from an ext3 filesystem. Someone ran rm -rf on a
directory ( thankfully not / ) this morning which wiped out the last 2
months of that person's work. Obviously they aren't
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> I saw references to having encrypted filesystems available in the next
> kernel release. If that's the case, and it's due out in the not to
> distant future, I could hold off.
I don't know if that's true or not. Check out kernel.org to find out.
A
Hello!
I've searched the archives, but the last time that I can find that this
issue was addressed was back in 2001, so I thought I'd check for updates.
I'm looking for a (hopefully easy) way to set up an AES encrypted
partition on my RedHat 9 system. I have a clean drive to use, and I do
not
root deviceMounting root
filesystemVFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev ide0(3,1).mount: error
22 mounting ext3pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed:
2Freeing unused kernel memory: 220k freedKernel panic: No init
found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
I allso fail to boo
root deviceMounting root
filesystemVFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev ide0(3,1).mount: error
22 mounting ext3pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed:
2Freeing unused kernel memory: 220k freedKernel panic: No init
found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
I allso fail to boo
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 14:13, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Achim Altmann wrote:
>
> > i would like install RedHat 8.0 on Dual-Athlon System (Mainboard tyan
> > with 64Bit slots) with 3Ware-Raid-Controller (64Bit) and as Filesystem
> > XFS.
>
> Red Hat
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Achim Altmann wrote:
> i would like install RedHat 8.0 on Dual-Athlon System (Mainboard tyan
> with 64Bit slots) with 3Ware-Raid-Controller (64Bit) and as Filesystem
> XFS.
Red Hat 8.0 does not support XFS. You can download an XFS-enabled boot
image for Red Hat 7.3
Hello,
i would like install RedHat 8.0 on Dual-Athlon
System (Mainboard tyan with 64Bit slots) with 3Ware-Raid-Controller
(64Bit)
and as Filesystem XFS.
Please could any help what i have to
do?
is it XFS compile into RedHat-Athlon-Kernel default
?
have i compile a new Kernel with
Chris St. Pierre said:
> Error reading block 32770 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted
> in short read) while reading inode and block bitmaps. Ignore error?
this is a fairly common error. Though it's been a while since I
encountered it. I think it is the result of faili
I've got linux installed on a laptop, and it has just die. When I start it
up, it tells me I have to do a manual fsck; when I do so, it comes to one
particularly problematic line:
Error reading block 32770 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in
short read) while reading inod
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 10:28, Shannon Neumann wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea how to mount a CD-RW as a read-write filesystem
> like I can on my Windows boxes? I would like to be able to drop a CD-RW in
> the drive and write files to it (and delete files from it) for backup
> pu
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Shannon Neumann wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea how to mount a CD-RW as a read-write filesystem
> like I can on my Windows boxes? I would like to be able to drop a CD-RW in
> the drive and write files to it (and delete files from it) for backup
> purposes. An
; *mount My_CD_Image.iso /ISO_Image_Directory -o loop -t iso9660*
>
> (2) Mount the image, edit/delete/add files/etc, umount then burn it.
ISO 9660 is a read-only filesystem.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE984+I0iMVcrivHFQRAqHlAJ9EdW+cCTe0qqE
(2) Mount the image, edit/delete/add files/etc, umount then burn it.
Once thats done, its as easy as burning the image with cdrecord.. ( I
haven't done any rewriting on cdr's, cant help much there.)
Robert S.
Shannon Neumann wrote:
Does anyone have any idea how to mount a CD-RW as
Hello Shannon,
Sunday, December 8, 2002, 11:28:45 AM, you textually orated:
SN> Does anyone have any idea how to mount a CD-RW as a read-write filesystem
SN> like I can on my Windows boxes? I would like to be able to drop a CD-RW in
SN> the drive and write files to it (and delete file
Does anyone have any idea how to mount a CD-RW as a read-write filesystem
like I can on my Windows boxes? I would like to be able to drop a CD-RW in
the drive and write files to it (and delete files from it) for backup
purposes. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Shannon Neumann
Neumannweb
Isn't that what "LVM" (for Logical Volume Manager") being designed for ?
Regards,
Raymond.
penelope wrote:
Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
span multiple partitions with a root filesystem.
I found this item in some coursework I am look
> Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
> span multiple partitions with a root filesystem.
>
> I found this item in some coursework I am looking at and (No its not
> an assignment.) As far as my experiences with Unix/Linux have gone
> it isn'
; software RAID.
>
>
> Are there any special implications or cosideration when using a large ( >
> 100's GB's) database on a software RAID filesystem?
I would think so. The main one being that raid controllers are designed
to handle failed drives gracefully (good SCSI ones,
ere any special implications or cosideration when using a large
( > 100's GB's) database on a software RAID filesystem?
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 01:20:56PM -0800, nate wrote:
> > Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
> > span multiple partitions with
> Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
> span multiple partitions with a root filesystem.
>
> I found this item in some coursework I am looking at and (No its not an
> assignment.) As far as my experiences with Unix/Linux have gone it isn't
&g
filesystem
Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
span multiple partitions with a root filesystem.
I found this item in some coursework I am looking at and (No its not
an assignment.) As far as my experiences with Unix/Linux have gone it
isn't possible to hav
Hi, I'm looking for information about whether it is possible to
span multiple partitions with a root filesystem.
I found this item in some coursework I am looking at and (No its not
an assignment.) As far as my experiences with Unix/Linux have gone it
isn't possible to have a single f
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:58, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 20:30, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> > I never understood where the line was since RH started including openssh
> > and probably others in 7.0.
>
> I believe that was after the export controls were relaxed.
>
> > IS there any w
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 20:30, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:07, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 19:08, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes... distributing crypto in the kernel has some legal complications so
> > > they just leave it out. You can get the things yo
On 26 Oct 2002, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Does that mean the US Gov. has relaxed the cryptography is a munition
> thing?
Yes -- in the last days of the Clinton administration ...
about two years ago
> I never understood where the line was since RH started including openssh
> and probably others in
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:07, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 19:08, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> >
> > Yes... distributing crypto in the kernel has some legal complications so
> > they just leave it out. You can get the things you need from
> > www.kerneli.org though...
>
> It's inclu
On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 19:08, Matthew Melvin wrote:
>
> Yes... distributing crypto in the kernel has some legal complications so
> they just leave it out. You can get the things you need from
> www.kerneli.org though...
It's included in Psyche.
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 8
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 at 5:42pm (-0700), Martin wrote:
> Does anyone have instructions on how to set up an encrypted filesystem
> on redhat 8.0?
>
> I looked at the losetup man page. but it appears maybe that the
> encryption modules are missing? is
> that right?
Yes... dist
Does anyone have instructions on how to set up an encrypted filesystem
on redhat 8.0?
I looked at the losetup man page. but it appears maybe that the
encryption modules are missing? is
that right?
thanks
Martin
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 06:35, Danny Sternkopf wrote:
> I have created ext3 filesystems on my RH 7.2 boxes. But it is very strange that the
>root
> filesystem can't be mountet as ext3. So I have no journaling for this filesystem.
...
> So both filesystems have has_journal feature
Hi,
I have created ext3 filesystems on my RH 7.2 boxes. But it is very strange that the
root
filesystem can't be mountet as ext3. So I have no journaling for this filesystem.
Other filesystem are mounted as ext3 as expected.
The following informations should help to understand my pr
Hi,
my first two emails were to big. So here is the 2nd part.
[root@linux log]# tune2fs -l /dev/hda1
tune2fs 1.23, 15-Aug-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Filesystem volume name: /
Last mounted on:
Filesystem UUID: 7e53e93b-7843-4832-bf8f-c9f40e69aa1d
Filesystem magic
Hi,
my first mail was incomplete. So this mail again.
I have created ext3 filesystems on my RH 7.2 boxes. But it is very strange that the
root
filesystem can't be mountet as ext3. So I have no journaling for this filesystem.
Other filesystem are mounted as ext3 as expected.
The foll
Hi,
I have created ext3 filesystems on my RH 7.2 boxes. But it is very strange that the
root
filesystem can't be mountet as ext3. So I have no journaling for this filesystem.
Other filesystem are mounted as ext3 as expected.
The following informations should help to understand my pr
Actually...reiserfs was not originally designed as a journaling file
system. It was a file system (without journaling) that sped up access
to small files.
So, both filesystems have had journaling added after they were
initially written.
-Sam
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:40:52PM -0700, Gordon Mes
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 16:33, Taylor Spears wrote:
> Well, I decided to go with ReiserFS. Ext3fs just sorta seems like a hack
> to ext2 to get journaling.
You could, I suppose, look at it one of two ways:
* ext3 is a hack on an old system
* ext2 was designed as an extensible, modular file system i
look bad.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Best Filesystem
>
>
> What would you say is the best filesystem to use for
used, but that was when I had IDE driver
problems, which made JFS look bad.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best Filesystem
What would you say is the bes
Hi,
I would use ext3, it is the x years old ext2 filesystem with the journaling
feature. It's very stable and compatible to ext2, so if you have any crash
it's easier to fix.
ReiserFS is faster but not stable enough to use it at important functions.
But if you want setup a Proxy i woul
What would you say is the best filesystem to use for linux in terms of
reliability, stability, and performance?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
h.
sorry.
yes, you're right. tune2fs
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Fratoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: covert filesystem
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 08:44 am, Teodor Georgiev wrote:
> unmount the file system (it will not work on a mounted one).
>
> and do:
>
> make2fs -j /dev/hda3 (your partition).
>
> -j is for journalling.
Please don'
ckily it has only happened once, but still, I
>want to make sure the data is safe.
"tunefs -j /dev/foo" will journalise it for you but you'll need to have
ext3 support
in your kernel and then modify /etc/fstab to change the filesystem types.
>Chris Mason
>[EMAIL PROTE
Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Redhat-list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: covert filesystem
> I have a RH 7.2 server with ext2 filesystems. Is there anyway to convert
> them to ext3? I want the superior recovery of ext3 as
I have a RH 7.2 server with ext2 filesystems. Is there anyway to convert
them to ext3? I want the superior recovery of ext3 as there is two 80 GB
data drives in addition to the 20 GB main drive, and recovery from a
crash takes a long time. Luckily it has only happened once, but still, I
want to ma
I'm looking to create an encrypted filesystem. I am
trying to follow the instructions of the
Loopback-encrypted-filesystem HOWTO at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
However, when I try to issue the following command:
losetup -e des /dev/loop3 /etc/cryp
Hi,
I wish to embeded my appilication
on a 16MB flash memory with the kernel image(2.2.16-22) . The filesystem
used
would be the JFS
filesystem.
Is it possible to do it. JFS
seems to have a limitation of 16 MB.
Please let me know, if it is
feasible.
Thanks and Regards
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 22:07, Deepak Kotian wrote:
>
> 1.Could someone please give me the installation procedure of jfs filesystem for
>Redhat 6.2, kernel-2.2.16
>The exact site and tarball, which needs to be downloaded.
I think you want "JFFS&
Hi,
1. Could someone please give me
the installation procedure of jfs filesystem for
Redhat 6.2,
kernel-2.2.16
The exact
site and tarball, which needs to be downloaded.
2. I have an system, why I need
to embed as well in a flash memory.
Can I
install the
This killed me too. I had bad ram. I swapped it out with some good stuff
and it installed fine.
-eric
- Original Message -
From: "Here and There" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2) I'm now "trying" to install 7.3 and
> the system hangs about 1/2 second into
oth DMA, hdb is
UDMA/ATA100), 2 NICs, Riva TNT 16MB, and
that's it.
2) I'm now "trying" to install 7.3 and
the system hangs about 1/2 second into
formatting the / filesystem, at the
beginning of the actual install after
getting all info. Should I not use
the GUI? Anyone els
>
> guys,
> question about nfs with large filesystems. i'm currently trying to
> mount a 2.4 terabyte filesystem from an AIX 4.3 box to a redhat 7.2 box.
> remotely, the fs is gpfs. the aix box is running nfs v3, as well as my
> linux client. i can get the filesystem
guys,
question about nfs with large filesystems. i'm currently trying to
mount a 2.4 terabyte filesystem from an AIX 4.3 box to a redhat 7.2 box.
remotely, the fs is gpfs. the aix box is running nfs v3, as well as my
linux client. i can get the filesystem mounted, the size looks ok
Hi,
I found a post in redhat-devel that suggests that booting the install kernel
with the reiserfs option the installer will allow installation on a reiserfs
filesystem (linux reiserfs). Is there a similar option for jfs? (it seems
that the redhat 7.3 kernel is compiled with jfs support
ecreating the device, and remounting the
second loopback filesystem the same thing happened again.
Booting again, and recreating the device, followed by attempting to mount -o
loop the device file again without using losetup first caused the system to
almost immediately crash. Nothing i
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 23:54, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Charles Galpin wrote:
>
> >> installing package kernel-2.4.9-31 needs 3Mb on the / filesystem
> >
> >This should read "needs an additional 3Mb&q
can use fsck to check an ext3 filesystem, and I have tried it.
But the problems is still on.
I want to know if there is any way to repair this problem, without
reinstalling linux.
>
> On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 03:16, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>> I h
Can you supply more information?
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 03:16, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently upgraded my system to use ext3 filesystems. It worked
> fine untill an electric crash. After that, I have a lot of problems with
> some files. It gives me a lot of "Input/Output
Hi,
I have recently upgraded my system to use ext3 filesystems. It worked
fine untill an electric crash. After that, I have a lot of problems with
some files. It gives me a lot of "Input/Output error". What can I do?
--
Angel L. Mateo
Redes y Comunicaciones - ATICA Tfo: +34 968
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Galpin wrote:
>> installing package kernel-2.4.9-31 needs 3Mb on the / filesystem
>
>This should read "needs an additional 3Mb". In other words 3Mb more than
>you have.
>
>Dunno. This happened to me on my
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 15:34, Bill Jacobs wrote:
> Installing a new kernel with RPM I get:
>
> installing package kernel-2.4.9-31 needs 3Mb on the / filesystem
This should read "needs an additional 3Mb". In other words 3Mb more than
you have.
Dunno. This happened to me on
Installing a new kernel with RPM I get:
installing package kernel-2.4.9-31 needs 3Mb on the / filesystem
but it looks to me like I have plenty of room:
]$ df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5 178884149560 20089 89% /
/dev/hda2
On 07:52 15 Feb 2002, rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| as i read it (and i'm hoping to be corrected if i'm wrong),
| the tmpfs filesystem is just a more convenient version of a
| ram disk, with the following properties:
|
| 1) i can create one at any time just
as i read it (and i'm hoping to be corrected if i'm wrong),
the tmpfs filesystem is just a more convenient version of a
ram disk, with the following properties:
1) i can create one at any time just by doing a mount:
# mount tmpfs -t tmpfs
2) a tmpfs sits directly on top
I COULD be wrong, but I *THINK* it is the same. Ext3 is just a journaled
ext2 I think.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
> over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
> file with i
> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
> over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
> file with it?
>
> I believe ext2 had a limit of around 2 gigs.
ext2 on 2.4.x kernel (rh 7.1/7.2) can handle files bigger than 4gb.
I use mysql wi
I've don't have any experience with such large files, but there was a
similar question on the Seawolf list (I think that's where it was).
Someone there posted this url:
http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html
Hope this helps,
Ben
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:35:32AM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On F
t
> Subject: Re: Ext 3 filesystem question
>
>
> Well... other os's are able to get around the limitation
> (wintendo for
> example). I'm hoping that ext3 (or just redhat 7.2 itself) doesn't
> have this limitation.
>
>
>
> >'
Well... other os's are able to get around the limitation (wintendo for
example). I'm hoping that ext3 (or just redhat 7.2 itself) doesn't
have this limitation.
>'
>
'
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:48:01AM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
>
>>> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with i
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:48:01AM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
> over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
> file with it?
>
> I believe ext2 had a limit of around 2 gigs.
It's not an ext
RedHat 7.2 supports ext3. I've been playing with it on a small test box
over the last few weeks. Does anyone know how large I can make a single
file with it?
I believe ext2 had a limit of around 2 gigs.
Thx
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PR
Hi,
After trying to build mozilla-0.9.6 on my RH 7.0 system I am having problems
with filesystem corruption. Not sure if this is due to the updates I did just
before, the building process itself, or the fact that I killed an mc ftp
connection from ftp.redhat.com.
Anyway
does anyone know of a method of converting a partition formatted in ReiserFS
to Ext3 NON-DESTRUCTIVELY? And without moving the data in and out. Ie.
tar cvz /datadir; umount /datadir; mke3fs /dev/hdXX; mount /dev/hdXX -t ext3
/datadir; tar xvz /datadir
is the type of scenario. What I want is this:
I have a 7.1 system that gets a lot of disk I/O activity. It's an
outgoing mail server that handles all of our hosted mailing lists. Two
of it's file systems seems to suffering from severe corruption after
several days of uptime. The /var/log filesystem I can stop all
service
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> I'm an idiot, sorry for the bandwidth waste. I had been disregarding
> the notice from fdisk saying that the partition table would not be
> updated until the system rebooted. Reboot, all is as expected.
i've known this for a while, but i've never
I'm an idiot, sorry for the bandwidth waste. I had been disregarding
the notice from fdisk saying that the partition table would not be
updated until the system rebooted. Reboot, all is as expected.
--
Michael Jinks, IB // Technical Entity // Saecos Corporation
Opinions expressed above are my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Chuck Mead wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, David Talkington spewed into the bitstream:
>
>DT> Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
>DT>/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
>DT>/dev/hda2 272 1559 9737280
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, David Talkington spewed into the bitstream:
DT> Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
DT>/dev/hda1 * 1 271 2048728+ b Win95 FAT32
DT>/dev/hda2 272 1559 9737280f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
DT>/dev/hda5 272 746
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Michael Jinks wrote:
> Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
>/dev/hda1 * 1 261 20964516 FAT16
>/dev/hda2 262 1021 6104700 83 Linux
>
>Command (m for help):
>
>...but when I try
the DOS partition, and I'd like to take the 6G now
> freed on the disk and make it a single e2fs filesystem.
>
> Okay, ran fdisk, it didn't complain...
>
> [root@gaea /root]# fdisk /dev/hda
>
> Command (m for help): p
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
