A lot of it depends on how adventuresome you are, and what you are running on it.
For my purposes, ReiserFS has run well. The only times I've had problems were with underlying IDE problems, or when an immature, buggy, driver overwrote freed memory. But there have been some reports of problems in some kernel releases. It does have advantages with more efficient use of disk space and small files. ext3 has the advantage that low level tools for ext2 can work on it. There are also XFS (SGI) and JFS (IBM), which I don't know enough to comment on. JFS is the only one I've used, but that was when I had IDE driver problems, which made JFS look bad. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor Spears Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 5:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Best Filesystem What would you say is the best filesystem to use for linux in terms of reliability, stability, and performance? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
