[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Dmitry Melekhov
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
BTW, I talked directly with a SuSE distributor regarding their SLES
product, same concept as
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
BTW, I talked directly with a SuSE distributor regarding their SLES
product, same concept as AS, and he confirmed my ideas. You pay for the
services, you are allowed to do with the software whatever you want.
Sorry, you are wrong :-(
They also force you to buy "service" on
Roger wrote:
This means you cannot install it on multiple servers from the CDs you
received when you buy a subscription, without licensing the additional
servers. As you are free to 'roll your own' version of Advanced Server,
it is quite acceptable to have one server that is licensed from CDs and
or Service per
Installed Server, pay a penalty equal to twenty percent (20%) of the
underreported fees.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Dmitry Melekhov
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A
Roger wrote:
The reason for wanting to subscribe for the SRPMS is for some level of
service in receiving the SRPMS as quickly as possible after a security
release. Although Red Hat makes the SRPMS publicly available on
updates.redhat.com, they may choose to delay the release of them except
for th
Roger wrote:
I disagree with you too :-)
Original post says that one want to buy subscription to one server
and then install updates from sources to several servers.
This is impossible according to Service Agreement.
You must pay for service for all servers.
If you can't read this is not my proble
Roger wrote:
I do not think it is possible to distribute these ISOs outside my
organisation as it will violate Red Hat's trademarks, however it is quite
easy to create your own version, I may publish some instructions on how I
did it if people are interested.
Yes, this is interesting :-)
--
r
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Roger
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
According to http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhlas_us.html
Dan Bar Dov wrote:
-Original Message-
If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to
^
get
the
SRPMS from RHN, which I then have it automatically build the RPM
and
distributed to my other servers.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Bar Dov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: Advanced Server 2.1 update SRPMS - where?
>
>
> > >
> > > If so, I guess I'll have to purchase one subscription just to get
> the
> > > SRPMS from
Roger wrote:
I have recently created my own version of Advanced Server 2.1 using the
SRPMS that Red Hat have made available and intend on using it on a few
dozen servers.
I have noticed that so far this year, 8 security packages for AS 2.1 have
been released, but none of the SRPMS have yet appear
Ben Russo wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 13:56, Michael Schwendt wrote:
.
Unless, of course, you rolled your own updates or applied the binary
software updates also in the second firm, which would be illegal
with regard to the licence agreement.
...
OK, (I originally started this thread wi
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Open Source Licensed RHAS, licenses?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 3 Jan 20
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Open Source Licensed RHAS, licenses?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 3 Jan 20
According to www.redha.com/licenses
you can copy RH AS and do as much installation as you want.
But according to Service Agreement you have to pay for server year.
I.e. you can do what you want without support or pay per server/year for
each server.
The same story is with Suse SLES, but they even d
Hello!
Unfortunately, 2.4 -aa VM is not good too.
Personally I never had problems with 2.4 VM, but we run Oracle for
not more than 30 users, but I see that there are VM problems with
2.4.18 kernels (kswap eats too much cpu), this is why now I test rmap VM.
But I know guys which wanted to run Oracl
- Original Message -
From: "R P Herrold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: RH AS subscription license
> On 23 Nov 2002, Jeff Bearer wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, One of the reasons they don't distribute ISO's of AS online is
> > ther
e much of a
> problem with that. but you will only have support on one.
>
Thank you!
You tell me what I wanted to hear ;-)
Let's compare this with Suse position:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Hasenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dmitry Melekhov&qu
Hello!
Could someone help me to understand RH AS subsciption licensing?
As I understanded from here
http://www.redhat.com/software/whichlinux.html
RH AS 2.1 is completely covered by GPL.
There are srpms of distribution and updates on ftp.redhat.com (great!).
But if I'll buy one box with CDs can
19 matches
Mail list logo
