Ben Russo wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 13:56, Michael Schwendt wrote: .....Unless, of course, you rolled your own updates or applied the binary software updates also in the second firm, which would be illegal with regard to the licence agreement.... OK, (I originally started this thread with a question).
RedHat states (in writing) that as far as copying and redistribution of each software package (whether in binary form or source code),
that is dependent on the EULA included in each package by itself.
From what it sounds like, only a select few of the packages will notbe redistributable.
Yes!
So, although I will only have the privelage of downloading errata andShure :-)
security/bug patch RPM's through 1 machine, there is nothing stopping me
from reading the EULA of each RPM downloaded and deciding if it is redistributable to my other "unlicensed" servers or not.
It may damage RedHat's business model, but that is not my problem.
Again, I'm ready and pay for _service_.
I don't see any difference in service between binary updates for one server or for ten.
Fortunately, I can legally pay only for one and use it on 10 ;-)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
