Edd Barrett wrote:
On 01/08/07, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Big. This is what I got:
10664524 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_base-2007.tgz
265570680 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-docs-2007.tgz
135153377 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-full-2007.tgz
129715539 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-minim
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:25:36PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Sorry guys, I don't have time to split it down further. Plus the whole
> point of TeXLive is that it is ridiculously comprehensive.
I wasn't complaining, just pointing out that it's probably too big for a
Zaurus. I'm sure we all appre
On 01/08/07, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Big. This is what I got:
>
>10664524 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_base-2007.tgz
> 265570680 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-docs-2007.tgz
> 135153377 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-full-2007.tgz
> 129715539 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_texmf-minimal-2007.tgz
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:55:24PM +0100, Fred Crowson wrote:
> Just a quick question how big is texmf-minimal?
>
> I ask as it was successfully building on a Zaurus until I ran out of
> space :~(
Big. This is what I got:
10664524 Aug 1 16:57 texlive_base-2007.tgz
265570680 Aug 1 16:57
Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi all,
On 17/07/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
going to import this in a few. hold on ;)
TeXLive is committed :)
Big thanks to all that helped! I will now be testing all ports
depending upon teTeX with the new teXLive build. Until this is
complet
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On 17/07/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
going to import this in a few. hold on ;)
TeXLive is committed :)
Big thanks to all that helped! I will now be testing all ports
depending upon teTeX with the new teXLive build. Until this is
complete the
Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 17/07/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> going to import this in a few. hold on ;)
>
> TeXLive is committed :)
>
> Big thanks to all that helped! I will now be testing all ports
> depending upon teTeX with the new teXLive build. Until
Hi all,
On 17/07/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
going to import this in a few. hold on ;)
TeXLive is committed :)
Big thanks to all that helped! I will now be testing all ports
depending upon teTeX with the new teXLive build. Until this is
complete the build is not l
On 17/07/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
attached is a port tweaked by me, with some help by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please test/comment/ok.
The slightly ammended version discussed via private mail (kpathsea
0.0) works perfectly here on i386.
Superb!
--
Best Regards
Edd
-
On 10/07/07, Emilio Perea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried to build your latest package yesterday, but my make was FUBARed
by the $DESTDIR change. After that was fixed, it built and installed
fine once again.
Great, Can you try building something with xelatex/fontspec (to get
documentatopn
t
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 09:31:36PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I have not had any feedback for my (hopefully) complete texlive port,
> nor have i had any comment upon my proposal for how it might be merged
> into the OpenBSD ports
The 0627 version of your port installed and works fine on amd64
-cu
Hi Paul,
Many thanks for your support.
On 10/07/07, Paul Branston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just tried it on a 3.9 box and got a checksum mismatch.
When testing ports you must always use a recent developer snapshot
(-current). The way ports handles checksums has recently changed in
-current,
Hi ports@,
I have not had any feedback for my (hopefully) complete texlive port,
nor have i had any comment upon my proposal for how it might be merged
into the OpenBSD ports
(http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=118313079506397&w=2 ). Apparently
Simon@ was going to test for me, but much time has
On 27/06/07, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only one point I remember from what I've seen (in some very early
of your submissions): the base package contains some binaries we've
already in ports.
This is fixed. All of the conflicting stuff seems happy to reside as
RUN_DEPENDS. Yet a
Hi,
On 27/06/07, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the base package contains some binaries we've
already in ports. Mainly some postscript conversion tools, but there
may be more. Not important for development, but it should be checked
and cleaned up to get more people involved when you
Hello,
On 28/06/07, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please write an article for TUGboat on this and I hope to meet you at
next years EuroTeX in Cork.
I would be honored to write an article for TUGboat, however, lets get
it committed first!
I would love to come to EuroTeX! Does it c
Hi,
On 28/06/07, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/27, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have tested this on sparc64 and i386 snapshots.
Just a note: The texmf-packages will be huge (100sMB) and are
plattform independent (i.e. like noarch-rpms). Are there any plans to
impleme
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:18:54PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2007/6/27, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I have tested this on sparc64 and i386 snapshots.
>
> Just a note: The texmf-packages will be huge (100sMB) and are
> plattform independent (i.e. like noarch-rpms). Are there any plans
2007/6/27, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have tested this on sparc64 and i386 snapshots.
Just a note: The texmf-packages will be huge (100sMB) and are
plattform independent (i.e. like noarch-rpms). Are there any plans to
implement noarch-packages for OpenBSD?
Best
Martin
> > >Also, I'd prefer to try to keep the old name (tetex) and treat it
> > >as an update for tetex, if possible (i.e. if there're similar
> > >subpackages). Else you've to mark tetex and texlive as conflicting
> > >and run into serious problems wrt ports depending on tetex.
> >
> > Ah. I see what
Ok,
On 28/06/07, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Well, I tried to keep this off ports@, but so be it]
I'm really sorry. I didn't notice it was personal (Gmail threaded it).
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:12:56AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >Only one point I remember from what I've s
[Well, I tried to keep this off ports@, but so be it]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:12:56AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >Only one point I remember from what I've seen (in some very early
> >of your submissions): the base package contains some binaries we've
> >already in ports.
[...]
>
> I could omi
Hi Kili,
On 27/06/07, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a quick note FYI: I'm still aware of your work, but unfortunately
I've all that Haskell ports in my queue and to get this shit finished,
I just need teTeX, and I don't have enought build/test machines to
work in parallel. But
Evening,
On 27/06/07, Fred Crowson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would ssh access to a Netra T1 105 (UltraSPARC-IIi 440Mhz 512Mb RAM and
9 Gb disk) be any help? Its currently got 4.1 but I can easily upgrade
it to -current.
My current sparc64 box is 500mHz and it's terribly slow. I guess that
ma
Hi,
On 27/06/07, Simon Bertrang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:09:28PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hello ports@,
>
> I have just finished a new revision of my texlive work.
>
Very nice!
Good, I'm glad I'm doing ok.
I'm currently looking at it and as usual start with t
Hello ports@,
I have just finished a new revision of my texlive work.
During the last week we have found 3 bugs in xetex and managed to
patch them out with help from Jonathan Kew (The main xetex developer).
2 bus error's were related to mishandling of the kerning tables on big
endian architectu
Hi,
On 16/06/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This port has problems on sparc64. During fmtutil-sys, xelatex "bus
error's". Also there is some arch specific bits which I missed in
texmf-docs.
Just a quick update:
This is a known bug in xetex for big endian systems. One of the
TeXLiv
Hi,
On 15/06/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I have completed the texlive modules and made the Makefiles more concise.
This port has problems on sparc64. During fmtutil-sys, xelatex "bus
error's". Also there is some arch specific bits which I missed in
texmf-docs.
One
Hi Matthias,
I have completed the texlive modules and made the Makefiles more concise.
Also the PLIST's are all freshly regenerated.
Porting documentation now well under way too.
Ready for download off my webpage.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http:
29 matches
Mail list logo
