Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117393/#review55931 --- Looks good. Maybe add a feature info bound to the build option

Review Request 117606: Make sure that the panel is not hidden when a plasmoid is expanded

2014-04-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117606/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-framework Description ---

Shutting down plasma-shell

2014-04-16 Thread Aleix Pol
Hi, A patch was merged today that makes it possible to use kquitapp5 again. It's especially interesting to use it to make sure that the settings will be saved. You can close plasma shell now by calling: kquitapp5 plasma_shell Note the underscore (_). Cheers! Aleix ___

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117393/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 8:28 p.m.) Review request for kwin and Plasma.

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On April 16, 2014, 6:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117601: Improve wallpapers deduplication code a bit

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Klapetek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117601/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 9:21 p.m.) Review request for Plasma. Changes

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Hrvoje Senjan
> On April 16, 2014, 4:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117601: Improve wallpapers deduplication code a bit

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Martin
> On April 16, 2014, 6:53 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > uhm, is this use of symlinks actually widespread/common or is some obscure > > corner case? > > Martin Klapetek wrote: > No idea; better safe than sorry was what I was thinking. yeah, let's go for it - Marco --

Re: Review Request 117601: Improve wallpapers deduplication code a bit

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Klapetek
> On April 16, 2014, 8:53 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > uhm, is this use of symlinks actually widespread/common or is some obscure > > corner case? No idea; better safe than sorry was what I was thinking. - Martin --- This is an automa

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
> On April 16, 2014, 4:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117601: Improve wallpapers deduplication code a bit

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117601/#review55907 --- uhm, is this use of symlinks actually widespread/common or is

Review Request 117601: Improve wallpapers deduplication code a bit

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Klapetek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117601/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description ---

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On April 16, 2014, 4:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On April 16, 2014, 6:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
> On April 16, 2014, 4:48 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be built even > > if they are included in the CMakeLists.txt. Given that I think that change > > is not needed at all. If there are tests which do not use ecm_mark_as_test > >

Re: Review Request 117393: Make building tests optional

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117393/#review55896 --- as all unit tests use ecm_mark_as_test the tests should not be

Re: Review Request 117565: Expose the quit slot on KDBusService-enabled applications

2014-04-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117565/#review55881 --- This review has been submitted with commit 29e485f793ef818c83

Re: Review Request 117565: Expose the quit slot on KDBusService-enabled applications

2014-04-16 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117565/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 2:28 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117565: Expose the quit slot on KDBusService-enabled applications

2014-04-16 Thread David Edmundson
> On April 15, 2014, 1:43 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > Not sure if exporting all Slots is what we want, but I think we do want to > > have Quit exposed in dbus. there is only one slot, and we can't really change QCoreApplication at this point. - David -

Re: Review Request 117565: Expose the quit slot on KDBusService-enabled applications

2014-04-16 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117565/#review55880 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On April 14, 2014, 4:1

Re: Review Request 117586: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Drop KDeclarative dependency from Greeter

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117586/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 12:49 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117586: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Drop KDeclarative dependency from Greeter

2014-04-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117586/#review55869 --- This review has been submitted with commit eea39156c3cd4c63b9

Re: Review Request 117586: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Drop KDeclarative dependency from Greeter

2014-04-16 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117586/#review55868 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On April 16, 2014, 11:

Review Request 117586: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Drop KDeclarative dependency from Greeter

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117586/ --- Review request for Plasma, David Edmundson and Marco Martin. Repository:

Re: Review Request 117417: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port the locker library away from kde4support

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117417/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 11:41 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117414: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port greeter away from kde4support

2014-04-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117414/#review55865 --- This review has been submitted with commit aacb22a1f92e42842c

Re: Review Request 117417: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port the locker library away from kde4support

2014-04-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117417/#review55866 --- This review has been submitted with commit 084d81346f67dd0cb9

Re: Review Request 117414: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port greeter away from kde4support

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117414/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 11:41 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117414: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port greeter away from kde4support

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117414/#review55864 --- Unfortunately I need to re-add the linking to kdelibs4support

Review Request 117584: Standardise DBus service CMake code

2014-04-16 Thread Alex Merry
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117584/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description ---

Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 00:40:42 Aleix Pol wrote: > > I don't think we can just tell people to use wmsystemtray. We should find > some way to integrate it, at least, maybe have a plasmoid that requests the > space and puts it in a smart place or something. > > Aleix wl, if it's xembedding

Re: Review Request 116874: Patch for the next and previous button functionality in an inactive playlist.

2014-04-16 Thread R.Harish Navnit
> On April 14, 2014, 12:58 p.m., Sinny Kumari wrote: > > checking only url of runtimeData will work only when PMC is launched and > > nothing has been played. You need to handle many other cases like when > > media get stopped, next/prev shouldn't be enabled until and unless current > > media

Re: Review Request 117411: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Remove support for legacy screen saver

2014-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117411/ --- (Updated April 16, 2014, 7:09 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 117411: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Remove support for legacy screen saver

2014-04-16 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117411/#review55837 --- This review has been submitted with commit e423dd17808d634f38