Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Meyer
Steven D'Aprano > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:25:06 am Leslie Newell wrote: > ... > > My challenge to you is to come up with a business model where > > I can both eat and make my code open source. > > It works for Eric Raymond, Guido van Rossum, Richard Stallman, > and hundreds of others. I think you

Re: [Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Meyer
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > I was brought up in a "Reform" Jewish congregation and was > > taught by my rabbi that heaven and hell don't exist at all > > and there is no afterlife, i.e., no such thing as paradise - > > though he was very circumspect about how he phrased such > > thou

Re: [Pan-users] OT: kde4 Was:: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread walt
On 03/09/2010 01:52 PM, Duncan wrote: With the upgrade, /as/ a major upgrade, I /did/ expect some problems, but this one was ridiculous. I spent over 100 hours above and beyond what I'd call normal upgrade time, researching and installing third party solutions for stuff still broken in kde 4.2,

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:25:06 am Leslie Newell wrote: > > That's what's nice about standard formats such as text/plain, > > text/html, and image/jpeg. > > Indeed but what happens for example if you write a word processor > that has more formatting options than HTML? You mean something like the open

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:05:59 am Joe Zeff wrote: > Please note that the Israelites had no problem with the people of > Edom, Amor or Moab worshiping other gods, because they were > righteous. The Amalikites, OTOH, who were in effect amoral, were an > entirely different matter. (They had, apparent

[Pan-users] Re: WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Alan Meyer posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:44:39 -0800 as excerpted: > I was brought up in a "Reform" Jewish congregation and was taught by my > rabbi that heaven and hell don't exist at all and there is no afterlife, > i.e., no such thing as paradise - though he was very circumspect about > how he

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:05:59 -0800 as excerpted: > On 03/09/2010 11:33 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Interesting, and something I didn't know. But I have a Christian >> friend of Jewish heritage, that speaks often of the six-hundred-some >> (?) commands, and with the below as well, "being

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Leslie Newell
That's what's nice about standard formats such as text/plain, text/html, and image/jpeg. Indeed but what happens for example if you write a word processor that has more formatting options than HTML? Les sees that as not practical, he says so himself. Free and open source folks see an

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:26:33 am Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/09/2010 03:39 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > even if you convert, > > which most rabbis don't allow and even those who do make it very > > difficult, you'll always be a Jew by conversion and not a "real" > > Jew. > > In general, rabbis disco

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Leslie Newell posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:47:23 + as excerpted: >>> Alternatively it is perfectly legal to borrow a Windows CD from >>> someone and install it. >>> >> Only if they delete their Windows install first. >> > As far as I know you can use it legally without uninstalling th

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Travis
-- From: "Jeremy Elliott" Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:58 PM To: Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? -- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Elliott To: pan-users@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:56:43 -0500 Su

[Pan-users] Re: Scoring question

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff posted on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:51:35 -0800 as excerpted: > On 03/08/2010 02:28 PM, Duncan wrote: >> But blocking by from/author name isn't a problem, since that's in the >> overview headers. [...] > Thank you. Done! [...] With luck, I've now seen the last of him: > good riddance to bad r

Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/09/2010 01:44 PM, Alan Meyer wrote: I wish I could be as sanguine as you are about our fellow Jews but, alas, I think there is just as much and as little intolerance among Jews as among Christians or others. This is exactly why I wrote "try to be." We're human, not perfect and sometimes

[Pan-users] OT: kde4 Was:: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
walt posted on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:04:44 -0800 as excerpted: > On 03/08/2010 06:14 AM, Leslie Newell wrote: >> Now take my home >> computer running Kubuntu 9.10. A lot of the applications that come with >> it have annoying bugs or in several cases complete show stoppers... > > Is it kde 4.x? The

Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Meyer
Joe Zeff wrote: > We consider ourselves "a nation of priests, and an example to > the nations," and the fact that "we answer to a higher > authority" isn't *just* an advertising slogan. We don't expect > everybody to live as we do, but we do try to show the world > that it's possible for people

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Steven D'Aprano posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:39:44 +1100 as excerpted: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:23:58 pm Duncan wrote: > >> That I know. What I don't know is whether there's a "salvation by >> faith" parallel that can be claimed (if only by some relatively minor >> sect) for Islam or most other

[Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Jeremy Elliott
-- Forwarded message -- From: Jeremy Elliott To: pan-users@nongnu.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? From: "Jeremy Elliott" Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:31 PM To: Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? >

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Meyer
... > Sorry about posting the answer before the question, that's the > way that Yahoo formats it by default. Also, I'm not posting > anything in HTML, unless Yahoo is forcing it in. Not sure about > that, because there's no option about it in anything I can see. Yahoo is forcing it in, but you can

Re: [Pan-users] WAAAY OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Alan Meyer
I did say earlier that I would love to discuss religion but didn't want to bore everyone. Well, I'm weak. I've given in to temptation ... Joe Zeff wrote: ... > And, I might add, that entire bit of "salvation by faith" is > completely foreign to Judaism. If you wish to earn Paradise, > you do

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Travis
-- From: "Jeremy Elliott" Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:31 PM To: Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? From: Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> To: pan-users@nongnu.org Sent: Tue, March 9, 2010 2:23:06 PM Subject: [Pan-users] Re:

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Jeremy Elliott
From: Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> To: pan-users@nongnu.org Sent: Tue, March 9, 2010 2:23:06 PM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? Travis posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:30:51 -0800 as excerpted: > -- From: "Jeremy > Elliott" Sent: >

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/09/2010 11:33 AM, Duncan wrote: Interesting, and something I didn't know. But I have a Christian friend of Jewish heritage, that speaks often of the six-hundred-some (?) commands, and with the below as well, "being a properly observant Jew is not exactly easy" would definitely seem a truis

[Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Travis posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:30:51 -0800 as excerpted: > -- From: "Jeremy > Elliott" Sent: > Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:28 AM To: > Subject: Re: > [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? > >> Thanks for the answer, Steve. I don't actually

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:26:33 -0800 as excerpted: > On 03/09/2010 03:39 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> even if you convert, >> which most rabbis don't allow and even those who do make it very >> difficult, you'll always be a Jew by conversion and not a "real" Jew. > > In general,

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/09/2010 03:39 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: even if you convert, which most rabbis don't allow and even those who do make it very difficult, you'll always be a Jew by conversion and not a "real" Jew. In general, rabbis discourage conversion and make it hard because we're not a proselytizi

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/09/2010 02:09 AM, Leslie Newell wrote: Unfortunately most of the main stream distros seem to be using it these days. Fedora is Gnome-centric. Yes, you can install and use the Latest and Greatest(?) version of KDE, but you're still going to end up with lots of Gnome-stuph. _

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Travis
-- From: "Jeremy Elliott" Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 8:28 AM To: Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? Thanks for the answer, Steve. I don't actually have any issues with Pan, just wondering if there had been any new features

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Leslie Newell posted on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:14:55 + as excerpted: > I'm jumping into this one a bit late and I am undoubtedly going to get > flamed for this but I think there is a place for closed source and > licensing. I disagree and believe that's unethical, but as long as it's not illegal

[Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Duncan
Paul Crawford posted on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:44:52 + as excerpted: > Duncan wrote: >> So what kind of /possible/ insanity would prompt a developer to add >> "anti- features", that is, additional code, complexity and potential >> for bugs, that has benefit for *NO* user, when every bit of added

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Jeremy Elliott
Thanks for the answer, Steve. I don't actually have any issues with Pan, just wondering if there had been any new features added or minor bugs that had been patched. I try to check the homepage every month or so, but I'd forgotten to check your page until I received that response. I've now also

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Panon Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:23:58 pm Duncan wrote: > That I know. What I don't know is whether there's a "salvation by > faith" parallel that can be claimed (if only by some relatively minor > sect) for Islam or most other religions. Of course there is, in some form, although Islam does include a much

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:57:29 am Leslie Newell wrote: > > What? > > > > If you're talking about the period between *purchasing* Windows > > (usually as part of a bundle with the computer) and when it goes > > into lock-down mode because you haven't registered, I think you're > > missing the point of

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Leslie Newell
Alternatively it is perfectly legal to borrow a Windows CD from someone and install it. Only if they delete their Windows install first. As far as I know you can use it legally without uninstalling their version first, as long as you do either delete it or install a kosher copy af

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Steve Davies
On 5 March 2010 21:57, Jeremy Elliott wrote: [snip] >> But AFAIK, at least one of the guys doing MS executables (IIRC there were >> two) has been building from the khaley sources, so using his should get >> you the patches already.  Again, I don't do servantware, so haven't >> bothered keeping up

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?

2010-03-09 Thread Leslie Newell
Unfortunately most of the main stream distros seem to be using it these days. Les walt wrote: Is it kde 4.x? The kde devs have been vilified by many users as guilty of releasing alpha quality software under version numbers that imply a mature product. I tried it about 4.2 or so and I couldn