On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 07:49:58PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:00:36 -0700
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +
> > > Humberto Alves wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, just get rid
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 14:08 +, Humberto Alves wrote:
> Looks perfect to me. Thanks!
>
> On 10/17/2017 03:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > What about
> > *:80<< both IPV6 and IPV4
> > [::]:80 << IPV6_ONLY
> > 0.0.0.0:80 << IPV4_ONLY
> >
>
Yes, I missed your email St
Looks perfect to me. Thanks!
On 10/17/2017 03:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:00:36 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +
Humberto Alves wrote:
Yes, just get rid of this 'if statem
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +
> Humberto Alves wrote:
>
> > Yes, just get rid of this 'if statement'.
> > in6addr_any should be represented as '::', not '*'. Otherwise it's
> > impossible to distinguish IPv4 listening addresses f
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +
Humberto Alves wrote:
> Yes, just get rid of this 'if statement'.
> in6addr_any should be represented as '::', not '*'. Otherwise it's
> impossible to distinguish IPv4 listening addresses from IPv6. Thank you :)
But IPv6 accepts IPv4 as well.
Yes, just get rid of this 'if statement'.
in6addr_any should be represented as '::', not '*'. Otherwise it's
impossible to distinguish IPv4 listening addresses from IPv6. Thank you :)
On 10/16/2017 11:33 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:57:37AM +, Humberto Alves wrote
IMHO that's not ugly.
How is that a feature? Differentiating IPv4 from IPv6 sockets is a
feature to me!
If you want to use '*' in IPv4 and IPv6, add another column please.
Thank you
On 10/16/2017 05:20 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:57:37 +
Humberto Alves wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:57:37 +
Humberto Alves wrote:
> Hi! With the last iproute2 release, ss command output does not
> differentiate between any-address IPv4 sockets from the IPv6 ones.
> I don't know if this is an expected behaviour, but the old output looks
> more useful. Below I pasted
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:57:37AM +, Humberto Alves wrote:
> Hi! With the last iproute2 release, ss command output does not
> differentiate between any-address IPv4 sockets from the IPv6 ones.
> I don't know if this is an expected behaviour, but the old output looks
> more useful. Below
