Re: [iproute2] regression in ss output

[Humberto Alves]

Looks perfect to me. Thanks!

On 10/17/2017 03:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:00:36 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 14:28 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:44:07 +0000
Humberto Alves <hjal...@live.com> wrote:

Yes, just get rid of this 'if statement'.
in6addr_any should be represented as '::', not '*'. Otherwise it's
impossible to distinguish IPv4 listening addresses from IPv6. Thank you :)

But IPv6 accepts IPv4 as well.

Not always (IPV6_V6ONLY socket option)

I agree that this recent change in ss is problematic.

Please give us back a way to distinguish IPV6 and IPv4

What about
        *:80    << both IPV6 and IPV4
        [::]:80 << IPV6_ONLY
        0.0.0.0:80  << IPV4_ONLY

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature