labath wrote:
Abandoning in favor of #134821
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134081
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/labath closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134821
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Pavel Labath
Date: 2025-04-09T08:22:15+02:00
New Revision: e348173bef7182c7cc609d0f000452d3acf4b65c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e348173bef7182c7cc609d0f000452d3acf4b65c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e348173bef7182c7cc609d0f000452d3acf4b65c.diff
https://github.com/kusmour updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
>From 12de149a1d2067e1d942cddfcc8576fb6fe7cee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wanyi Ye
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 22:29:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Make SBProcess thread related actions listen to
StopLocker
https://github.com/slydiman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132274
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Dmitry Vasilyev
Date: 2025-04-09T09:11:56+04:00
New Revision: fbc6241d3af45d74ac8e8d3728a57435aab1d5ec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fbc6241d3af45d74ac8e8d3728a57435aab1d5ec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fbc6241d3af45d74ac8e8d3728a57435aab1d5ec.dif
https://github.com/kusmour edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jason Molenda
Date: 2025-04-08T21:05:50-07:00
New Revision: 50e218ad9cef3e59f8d8ba8c9c7b57ce9c213c52
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50e218ad9cef3e59f8d8ba8c9c7b57ce9c213c52
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50e218ad9cef3e59f8d8ba8c9c7b57ce9c213c52.diff
https://github.com/kusmour edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kusmour updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
>From 12de149a1d2067e1d942cddfcc8576fb6fe7cee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wanyi Ye
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 22:29:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Make SBProcess thread related actions listen to
StopLocker
--
https://github.com/JDevlieghere updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134956
>From ea8bfa041c697a1f1726f5a92307f7d32d263e7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:33:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Handle signals in a separate thread in the driver
@@ -222,6 +222,21 @@ ObjCLanguage::GetMethodNameVariants(ConstString
method_name) const {
return variant_names;
}
+std::pair
+ObjCLanguage::GetFunctionNameInfo(ConstString name) const {
+ FunctionNameType func_name_type = eFunctionNameTypeNone;
+
+ if (ObjCLanguage::IsPos
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134956
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test`
while building `lldb,llvm` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/8565
Here is
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: Jan Patrick Lehr (jplehr)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#134719
This broke many buildbots
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134872.diff
11 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Core/Statusline.cpp (+5-1
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134757
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
jimingham wrote:
> > I wonder if we should add a test about the things we DON'T hand out when a
> > process is running just so we claim the behavior concretely.
>
> Unit tests on the SB API or DAP API tests? I am happy to add tests as
> follow-ups
I meant SB API tests, to assert that we don't
Author: Jason Molenda
Date: 2025-04-08T14:00:42-07:00
New Revision: 76d722732d7b417438f7aee8c36d79bf4feb2e97
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76d722732d7b417438f7aee8c36d79bf4feb2e97
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/76d722732d7b417438f7aee8c36d79bf4feb2e97.diff
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
Thanks for bearing with us. This LGTM modulo inline comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132274
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.o
jimingham wrote:
I wonder if we should add a test about the things we DON'T hand out when a
process is running just so we claim the behavior concretely.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.
jimingham wrote:
That sounds right to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/oontvoo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134922
None
>From ab50c89574613178ba2bf79455eaa8aba0f2205d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vy Nguyen
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:58:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB][NFC]Also includes the error in log msg.
---
lldb/inclu
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132274
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kuilpd ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134428
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/kusmour edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134339
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `lldb,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/222
https://github.com/jimingham approved this pull request.
LGTM too
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134757
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: cmtice
Date: 2025-04-08T11:37:54-07:00
New Revision: c4c0ff686563999176f16a40274586ee0d32c66f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c4c0ff686563999176f16a40274586ee0d32c66f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c4c0ff686563999176f16a40274586ee0d32c66f.diff
LOG: [
@@ -391,8 +392,13 @@ bool Debugger::SetTerminalWidth(uint64_t term_width) {
if (auto handler_sp = m_io_handler_stack.Top())
handler_sp->TerminalSizeChanged();
- if (m_statusline)
-m_statusline->TerminalSizeChanged();
+
+ {
+// This might get called from a signa
https://github.com/jplehr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134872
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
clayborg wrote:
> That code has been there at least since the dread reformatting.
>
> I have no idea why past one of us thought it was a good idea to return the
> previous number of threads or the old thread list when you weren't stopped.
> We don't do that with most anything else you ask abou
https://github.com/slydiman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134383
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Dmitry Vasilyev
Date: 2025-04-08T22:24:59+04:00
New Revision: 7e70d708a39470397a8df9aa5842d0875b471def
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e70d708a39470397a8df9aa5842d0875b471def
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e70d708a39470397a8df9aa5842d0875b471def.dif
@@ -71,8 +71,6 @@ add_lldb_library(lldbCore
lldbUtility
lldbValueObject
lldbVersion
-lldbPluginCPlusPlusLanguage
-lldbPluginObjCLanguage
JDevlieghere wrote:
You can now add `NO_PLUGIN_DEPENDENCIES` to `add_lldb_library` above and
resolve t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-sharedlibs`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-sharedlibs` while building `lldb,llvm` at step
5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/80/builds/12332
Here
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
Thanks, this LGTM and addresses my concerns!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134383
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
🫡
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134821
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
kuilpd wrote:
> This is the reason. Long-term maintainability of the project. We already have
> (too) many different ways to build test binaries, so you need a very good
> reason to introduce another method, and frankly, I don't think you have one.
Is it a general consensus that people shouldn
Author: David Spickett
Date: 2025-04-08T12:17:07Z
New Revision: db7fb704f6d5337399172331b4ee46e846171061
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db7fb704f6d5337399172331b4ee46e846171061
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/db7fb704f6d5337399172331b4ee46e846171061.diff
LOG
clayborg wrote:
So after looking further into the, the issue is that
`SBProcess::GetNumThreads()` and `SBProcess::GetThreadAtIndex()` will ignore
the process stop locker and return stale data. If the run lock can't be
acquired, it will not allow the thread list to update, but will return the
https://github.com/Jlalond closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129307
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `arc-builder` running on
`arc-worker` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/14248
Here is the relevant piec
Author: Adrian Prantl
Date: 2025-04-08T09:49:36-07:00
New Revision: 2721d50d8785603987358afb4d82b986879ca41e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2721d50d8785603987358afb4d82b986879ca41e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2721d50d8785603987358afb4d82b986879ca41e.diff
@@ -391,8 +392,13 @@ bool Debugger::SetTerminalWidth(uint64_t term_width) {
if (auto handler_sp = m_io_handler_stack.Top())
handler_sp->TerminalSizeChanged();
- if (m_statusline)
-m_statusline->TerminalSizeChanged();
+
+ {
+// This might get called from a signa
Author: Jacob Lalonde
Date: 2025-04-08T09:47:52-07:00
New Revision: f869d6efeec825c384dd9410fd29f90078e40c30
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f869d6efeec825c384dd9410fd29f90078e40c30
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f869d6efeec825c384dd9410fd29f90078e40c30.diff
Jlalond wrote:
Did some additional validation offline, where I save a jumbo Minidump (50gb).
We have improved disk IO and a flat memory profile.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129307
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -2074,6 +2076,64 @@ static const Definition *FindEntry(const llvm::StringRef
&format_str,
return parent;
}
+/// Parses a single highlighting format specifier.
+///
+/// Example syntax for such specifier:
+/// \code
+/// ${function.name-with-args:%highlight_basename(ansi.
https://github.com/ronlieb approved this pull request.
@adrian-prantlok to revert ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134872
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-comm
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/8307
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx64-nvidia-win`
running on `as-builder-8` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/155/builds/8211
Here is t
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
🚀
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134821
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/9174
Here is t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx-nvidia-win`
running on `as-builder-8` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/54/builds/8065
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-nvptx64-nvidia-ubuntu` running on `as-builder-7` while building
`lldb,llvm` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/160/builds/15965
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-nvptx-nvidia-ubuntu`
running on `as-builder-7` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/180/builds/15954
Here is the relevant pi
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`polly-x86_64-linux-shared-plugin` running on `polly-x86_64-gce2` while
building `lldb,llvm` at step 5 "build".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/118/builds/5634
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-linux` running on `avx512-intel64` while building
`lldb,llvm` at step 7 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/133/builds/14162
Here is the relevan
https://github.com/felipepiovezan approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134757
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `lldb,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/14843
Here i
@@ -116,8 +116,10 @@ class DILParser {
lldb::DynamicValueType m_use_dynamic;
bool m_use_synthetic;
- bool m_fragile_ivar;
- bool m_check_ptr_vs_member;
+ // The following are not currently used, but will be used as more
+ // functionality is added to DIL.
+ bool m_fra
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-latest-gcc`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-latest-gcc` while building `lldb,llvm` at step
5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/130/builds/12103
Here
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134778
>From a683bad89abeef9d1adacc99bb6ba3aa3b75a35e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:51:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLDB] Fix warnings in DIL.
This fixes 3 warnings from compil
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `lldb,llvm` at step 9 "Add check check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/20729
Here
https://github.com/adrian-prantl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134719
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -2074,6 +2076,64 @@ static const Definition *FindEntry(const llvm::StringRef
&format_str,
return parent;
}
+/// Parses a single highlighting format specifier.
+///
+/// Example syntax for such specifier:
+/// \code
+/// ${function.name-with-args:%highlight_basename(ansi.
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime-2` running on `rocm-worker-hw-02` while building
`lldb,llvm` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/3036
Here is the relev
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-rhel-8-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-rhel-8` while
building `lldb,llvm` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/204/builds/5824
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-ubuntu-22-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-ubu-22`
while building `lldb,llvm` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/203/builds/7011
Here is the
@@ -2074,6 +2076,64 @@ static const Definition *FindEntry(const llvm::StringRef
&format_str,
return parent;
}
+/// Parses a single highlighting format specifier.
+///
+/// Example syntax for such specifier:
+/// \code
+/// ${function.name-with-args:%highlight_basename(ansi.
@@ -208,6 +211,71 @@ static bool PrettyPrintFunctionNameWithArgs(Stream
&out_stream,
return true;
}
+static bool GetUseColor(ExecutionContextScope *exe_scope) {
+ if (!exe_scope)
+return false;
+
+ auto target_sp = exe_scope->CalculateTarget();
+ if (!target_sp)
+
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 6238017ddcf9846cc5bdc7aaa84407240e4d1139 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:57:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [llvm][ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
Author: Adrian Prantl
Date: 2025-04-08T08:03:32-07:00
New Revision: 561506144531cf0a760bb437fd74c683931c60ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/561506144531cf0a760bb437fd74c683931c60ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/561506144531cf0a760bb437fd74c683931c60ae.diff
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -208,6 +211,71 @@ static bool PrettyPrintFunctionNameWithArgs(Stream
&out_stream,
return true;
}
+static bool GetUseColor(ExecutionContextScope *exe_scope) {
+ if (!exe_scope)
+return false;
+
+ auto target_sp = exe_scope->CalculateTarget();
+ if (!target_sp)
+
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 6238017ddcf9846cc5bdc7aaa84407240e4d1139 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:57:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [llvm][ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 6238017ddcf9846cc5bdc7aaa84407240e4d1139 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:57:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [llvm][ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
https://github.com/slydiman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132274
>From 40d69ed7386c3f8169b324bd3b7591a46e34ff4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Vasilyev
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:50:51 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLDB] Refactored CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName to break
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133249
>From 5183ff468fc31c754f1e26c792384f9c5fd9c19c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:57:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][ItaniumDemangle] Add function name location tracking
-
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 0ffad2c257d9405d67c9d522ddbb7c76719e6f66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
OutputB
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (cmtice)
Changes
This fixes 3 warnings from compiling the DILParser:
DILParser.h:53:12: warning: returning address of local temporary object
[-Wreturn-stack-address]
DILParser.h:119:8: warning: private field 'm_fragile_ivar' is not u
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxxabi
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
This patch adds a new `frame-format` variable to allow highlighting function
basenames when formatting frame names in LLDB ([see this
RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-ll
https://github.com/Michael137 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 0ffad2c257d9405d67c9d522ddbb7c76719e6f66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
OutputB
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 65aab6b727cc430a9e826c7eeda67259e041a462 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
OutputB
https://github.com/GeorgeHuyubo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134563
>From b4992fb5a841e546ef503f0257164b7d1f8c70ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: George Hu
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:37:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add download time for each module in statistics
---
lldb/inclu
https://github.com/labath approved this pull request.
Looks good, thanks for your patience.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131609
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 65aab6b727cc430a9e826c7eeda67259e041a462 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
OutputB
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131836
>From 65aab6b727cc430a9e826c7eeda67259e041a462 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:21:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [ItaniumDemangle] Add printLeft/printRight APIs to
OutputB
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134806
.. which prepares us for handling of discontinuous functions. The main
change there is that we can have multiple FDEs contributing towards an
unwind plan of a single function. This patch separates the logic for
pa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
.. which prepares us for handling of discontinuous functions. The main
change there is that we can have multiple FDEs contributing towards an
unwind plan of a single function. This patch separates the logic for
91 matches
Mail list logo
