kuilpd wrote: > This is the reason. Long-term maintainability of the project. We already have > (too) many different ways to build test binaries, so you need a very good > reason to introduce another method, and frankly, I don't think you have one. Is it a general consensus that people shouldn't use unit tests anymore?
> If you don't build the test binaries with the same compiler as the rest of > the tests, you will expose the test to all of the quirks and bugs of the host > compiler, which means that this test will be testing a different thing for > every user. This is what I tried to do, I looked at how Python builds test binaries and repeated the same commands in CMake. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134428 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
