On 7 March 2012 23:47, Ken Werner wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 01:26 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ken. In follow up to our 1-on-1 yesterday, here's what I'd like done
>> next.
>>
>> The goal is to use OE Core as a release test suite. The releases are
>> tarballs so we can keep the current recipe f
> In some ways it should. The binary toolchain has the multiarch
> patches and should use the same search path. Should the sysroot
> contain libgcc and libstdc++ at all?
>
The sysroot contain libgcc and libstdc++. But they are not in the
search path. In the sysroot, they are at:
/lib/arm-linux-g
On 7 March 2012 17:42, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
>
>> I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
>> like ).
>
> Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
>
> BTW: which sysroot you are using to test?
I try the three sy
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:00 AM, ezjd wrote:
> On 03/07/2012 05:45 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, but no, the *binary* toolchains are configured for ARMv7, and even if
> you pass the "-march=armv6" flag that doesn't change the configuration of
> libgcc and the other precompiled bit-and-bobs
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
>
>> I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
>> like ).
>
> Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
>
> BTW: which sysroot you are using to test?
>
>> All
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
wrote:
> On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>> On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
>>> wrote:
Hi
Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. Thi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Asa Sandahl wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> A new bug triaging question.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppl/+bug/941676
>
> This one is special too because the failure is on powerpc.
> This means, I cannot reproduce it easily, and scan through the toolchains
On 03/06/2012 01:26 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Ken. In follow up to our 1-on-1 yesterday, here's what I'd like done next.
The goal is to use OE Core as a release test suite. The releases are
tarballs so we can keep the current recipe format and punt bzr support
for later. The first step is to
On 02/27/2012 10:12 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
Hi Ken, Thiago. Could you try your hand at writing cards for the
OpenEmbedded Core meta-layer and GDB and Android? Here are some past
cards:
https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-GCC-O3
https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/TCWG2011-OPENOCD-SUPPORT
On 03/07/2012 05:45 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Sorry, but no, the *binary* toolchains are configured for ARMv7, and
even if you pass the "-march=armv6" flag that doesn't change the
configuration of libgcc and the other precompiled bit-and-bobs that
get linked in.
If you build your own compile
Hi Michael,
Spec2000 is now running successfully: there are results at
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114965/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild257-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1/spec2000-o3-neon-run.txt
However, they seem to have been run in 'train' mode, and none of the
runs are long e
Hi Michael,
A new bug triaging question.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppl/+bug/941676
This one is special too because the failure is on powerpc.
This means, I cannot reproduce it easily, and scan through the toolchains
(without building).
Matthias has given some information and a g
ezjd wrote:
> However, in Precise, I have troubles running this ARM11 u-boot and
> kernel built with Linaro toolchain, eventually I found that my old gcc
> 4.3.2 toolchain can still build workable u-boot and kernel so that
> Linaro toolchain (gcc 4.6.2) seems the problem. I understand that
> Lina
On Wed 07 Mar 2012 04:30:55 GMT, ezjd wrote:
Hello,
My name is Jiandong Zheng and am working on a few ARM specific
projects. I have been using Linaro toolchain coming with Ubuntu to do
Cortext-A9 building. I also need to maintain code for old ARM11 SoC so
that Linaro toolchain is my preferenc
Hi,
Here is a new wiki page for benchmarking with cbuild. I separated it into
one part describing how to use the autobuilders, and one part for setting
stuff up manually, for instance for running on the ursas.
*
*
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Benchmarks/RunningBenchmarksWithCbui
Hello,
My name is Jiandong Zheng and am working on a few ARM specific projects.
I have been using Linaro toolchain coming with Ubuntu to do Cortext-A9
building. I also need to maintain code for old ARM11 SoC so that Linaro
toolchain is my preference and it did the job well back in Maverick day
W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze:
> I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
> like ).
Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing.
BTW: which sysroot you are using to test?
> All can pass after coping the libgcc* to /lib
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net
On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I
>>> split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym a
18 matches
Mail list logo
