On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
>> <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I
>>> split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less
>>> disk space is used.
>>>
>>> Please take a look at them and report any issues.
>>>
>>> 1. http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/sysroots/20120301/
>>
>> Zhenqiang, could you have a look at these please?  I'll have a poke
>> around in the nano-dev image out of interest.
>>

I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files
like <X11/Xlib.h>). All can pass after coping the libgcc* to /lib
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/+bug/939143).

There is an "arm-linux-gnueabihf" dir in sysroot-*-dbg. Does this mean
the binary toolcahin need support two different archs? How to confiure
to support it?

Thanks!
-Zhenqiang

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to