On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 07.03.2012 10:21, Zhenqiang Chen pisze: > >> I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files >> like <X11/Xlib.h>). > > Ok. Inform me if any header will be missing. > > BTW: which sysroot you are using to test? > >> All can pass after coping the libgcc* to /lib >> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/+bug/939143). > > So it does not finds libgcc_s.so in usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.6/ > directory?
In some ways it should. The binary toolchain has the multiarch patches and should use the same search path. Should the sysroot contain libgcc and libstdc++ at all? Separately we need to shift the libgcc and libstdc++ made as part of the binary toolchain build out of the sysroot. This lets you nuke the sysroot and replace it without losing the support libraries. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
