On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 March 2012 09:39, Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 7 March 2012 05:55, Michael Hope <michael.h...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz >>> <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Updated sysroots for binary toolchain are available at [1]. This time I >>>> split -dev and -dbg sysroots so as long as dbgsym are not needed less >>>> disk space is used. >>>> >>>> Please take a look at them and report any issues. >>>> >>>> 1. http://people.linaro.org/~hrw/generic-linux/sysroots/20120301/ >>> >>> Zhenqiang, could you have a look at these please? I'll have a poke >>> around in the nano-dev image out of interest. >>> > > I try the sysroots to build small cases (with additional header files > like <X11/Xlib.h>).
Sorry, what are these changes? Patches to the source themselves? How about something meaty like qemu? It's designed to cross compile and uses interesting libraries like SDL, X, and OpenGL. > All can pass after coping the libgcc* to /lib > (https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/+bug/939143). > > There is an "arm-linux-gnueabihf" dir in sysroot-*-dbg. Does this mean > the binary toolcahin need support two different archs? How to confiure > to support it? This is the same architecture but using the hard float calling convention. We don't need to support that right now, but Ubuntu has switched to hard float by default. We need a plan for that. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
